• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Then there's this.... Proof found!

Face of an angel?
susenena.jpg


Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
 
So a woman in Britain fakes 11 rape accusations, which is proof that Doe is faking this one?

That's the same logic saying Beau Donaldson was a Griz football player accused of rape who was found guilty, so therefor JJ is also guilty.

Am I saying there's no possibility that she's faking it? Of course not, but some of you are really jumping off the deep end here.

Some girls falsely report rapes. (An extremely small number)

But some football players rape girls. (Also a small number)
 
uofmman1122 said:
So a woman in Britain fakes 11 rape accusations, which is proof that Doe is faking this one?

That's the same logic saying Beau Donaldson was a Griz football player accused of rape who was found guilty, so therefor JJ is also guilty.

Am I saying there's no possibility that she's faking it? Of course not, but some of you are really jumping off the deep end here.

Some girls falsely report rapes. (An extremely small number)

But some football players rape girls. (Also a small number)

No, Beau was not found guilty. He admitted guilt which is much different. Also i highly doubt he was being serious about this being proof she is lying...it seems the proof of that is being displayed daily in court.
 
uofmman1122 said:
So a woman in Britain fakes 11 rape accusations, which is proof that Doe is faking this one?

That's the same logic saying Beau Donaldson was a Griz football player accused of rape who was found guilty, so therefor JJ is also guilty.

Am I saying there's no possibility that she's faking it? Of course not, but some of you are really jumping off the deep end here.

Some girls falsely report rapes. (An extremely small number)

But some football players rape girls. (Also a small number)

What I'm saying with this is that there are people out there that think the other side of this argument doesn't exist but here it is in ONE example... Trying to bring those on here down to earth that think people don't make shit up "just because"...I have kids that make shit up regularly to get something they want... The concept is not foreign...


Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
 
bGrizzled said:
uofmman1122 said:
So a woman in Britain fakes 11 rape accusations, which is proof that Doe is faking this one?

That's the same logic saying Beau Donaldson was a Griz football player accused of rape who was found guilty, so therefor JJ is also guilty.

Am I saying there's no possibility that she's faking it? Of course not, but some of you are really jumping off the deep end here.

Some girls falsely report rapes. (An extremely small number)

But some football players rape girls. (Also a small number)

What I'm saying with this is that there are people out there that think the other side of this argument doesn't exist but here it is in ONE example... Trying to bring those on here down to earth that think people don't make shit up "just because"...I have kids that make shit up regularly to get something they want... The concept is not foreign...


Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2

there are certainly cases of rape being falsely reported, however it is more common that cases of actual rape go unreported due to the character assassination like has been displayed by several fizz fans on this board.
 
bGrizzled said:
uofmman1122 said:
So a woman in Britain fakes 11 rape accusations, which is proof that Doe is faking this one?

That's the same logic saying Beau Donaldson was a Griz football player accused of rape who was found guilty, so therefor JJ is also guilty.

Am I saying there's no possibility that she's faking it? Of course not, but some of you are really jumping off the deep end here.

Some girls falsely report rapes. (An extremely small number)

But some football players rape girls. (Also a small number)

What I'm saying with this is that there are people out there that think the other side of this argument doesn't exist but here it is in ONE example... Trying to bring those on here down to earth that think people don't make shit up "just because"...I have kids that make shit up regularly to get something they want... The concept is not foreign...


Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
I figured that's what you were trying to say, but the Donaldson flip side works equally well for the other side.

And yeah, Donaldson wasn't "found" guilty, he was guilty, just like there's a possibility that JJ is guilty, too.

Seriously, I don't disagree with anyone that says JJ probably will be found not guilty, but it has everything to do with the prosecution not eliminating doubt or giving proof that JJ knew he was having sex without consent.

I'll be the first to admit I was wrong if it comes out, but I'm almost positive she's not faking this.
 
uofmman1122 said:
bGrizzled said:
uofmman1122 said:
So a woman in Britain fakes 11 rape accusations, which is proof that Doe is faking this one?

That's the same logic saying Beau Donaldson was a Griz football player accused of rape who was found guilty, so therefor JJ is also guilty.

Am I saying there's no possibility that she's faking it? Of course not, but some of you are really jumping off the deep end here.

Some girls falsely report rapes. (An extremely small number)

But some football players rape girls. (Also a small number)

What I'm saying with this is that there are people out there that think the other side of this argument doesn't exist but here it is in ONE example... Trying to bring those on here down to earth that think people don't make shit up "just because"...I have kids that make shit up regularly to get something they want... The concept is not foreign...


Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
I figured that's what you were trying to say, but the Donaldson flip side works equally well for the other side.

And yeah, Donaldson wasn't "found" guilty, he was guilty, just like there's a possibility that JJ is guilty, too.

Seriously, I don't disagree with anyone that says JJ probably will be found not guilty, but it has everything to do with the prosecution not eliminating doubt or giving proof that JJ knew he was having sex without consent.

I'll be the first to admit I was wrong if it comes out, but I'm almost positive she's not faking this.

Listen to yourself. You are saying if he is found not guilty, he probably did rape her in your mind. What will you be admitting you are wrong on?
 
coyote said:
uofmman1122 said:
bGrizzled said:
uofmman1122 said:
So a woman in Britain fakes 11 rape accusations, which is proof that Doe is faking this one?

That's the same logic saying Beau Donaldson was a Griz football player accused of rape who was found guilty, so therefor JJ is also guilty.

Am I saying there's no possibility that she's faking it? Of course not, but some of you are really jumping off the deep end here.

Some girls falsely report rapes. (An extremely small number)

But some football players rape girls. (Also a small number)

What I'm saying with this is that there are people out there that think the other side of this argument doesn't exist but here it is in ONE example... Trying to bring those on here down to earth that think people don't make shit up "just because"...I have kids that make shit up regularly to get something they want... The concept is not foreign...


Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
I figured that's what you were trying to say, but the Donaldson flip side works equally well for the other side.

And yeah, Donaldson wasn't "found" guilty, he was guilty, just like there's a possibility that JJ is guilty, too.

Seriously, I don't disagree with anyone that says JJ probably will be found not guilty, but it has everything to do with the prosecution not eliminating doubt or giving proof that JJ knew he was having sex without consent.

I'll be the first to admit I was wrong if it comes out, but I'm almost positive she's not faking this.

Listen to yourself. You are saying if he is found not guilty, he probably did rape her in your mind. What will you be admitting you are wrong on?
No.

I'm saying that this girl feels like she's been raped. I'm only trying to give a reason as to why she decided to take this trial all the way through, instead of saying "she's obviously faking it. There's no other reason this case went to trial".

It's not rape if JJ believed he was having consensual sex, and she never gave him a clear reason to believe otherwise.
 
Well, they're both "all in"......and somebody gets to live the lie. Helluva life ahead for both.
 
Back
Top