• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

The NIL needs our help - right now

Wasn’t this article sort of debunked as not all NIL related. I think a lot of these numbers include donations for thinks facilities, etc over like a 15 or 20 year period.
According to total cumulative “donations and contributions” findings from 2005 through the end of the 2022 season via USA Today and the Knight Commission, programs who receive the most donor funs tend to have a heightened advantage against others through recruiting success, coaching prestige, facility enhancements and other upgrades.
 
All I know is what the article said. Feel free to pick it apart.
The amounts listed in that article do not represent what each school has in NIL currently but how committed their boosters have been monetarily to their respective universities over the span of 20 years as a gauge of how it might translate to NIL. It’s not necessarily a good depiction of what players are making at a given school in a given year.
 
The amounts listed in that article do not represent what each school has in NIL currently but how committed their boosters have been monetarily to their respective universities over the span of 20 years as a gauge of how it might translate to NIL. It’s not necessarily a good depiction of what players are making at a given school in a given year.
I didn't say anything about what I posted. It was from a credible link that the former Sports Information Director at Dartmouth sent me. I made no comment about it. I would have provided the link, but it was in a format that wouldn't post to egriz. I just posted the text. Feel free to pick away at it. I'm pretty sure you don't know what you are talking about either.
 
I didn't say anything about what I posted. It was from a credible link that the former Sports Information Director at Dartmouth sent me. I made no comment about it. I would have provided the link, but it was in a format that wouldn't post to egriz. I just posted the text. Feel free to pick away at it. I'm pretty sure you don't know what you are talking about either.
It’s just a 247 Sports articles.
 
Everyone likes to talk about how dominate the Dakota schools are and rightfully so, but look at this huge advantage in retaining and recruiting players when you can offer all three of these things below...

"The two FCS teams in North Dakota are showing their continued commitment and investment in athletics success.

Some FCS-level athletic departments offer cost of attendance. Some have NIL collectives. Some do Alston payments.

We can only think of two FCS-level programs that offer all three to its athletes: North Dakota and North Dakota State.

Cost of attendance has been around for several years. It’s for student-athlete expenses beyond tuition, fees, room and board, and books. Payments are usually between $3,000-$4,000 per year for a full-scholarship athlete, or a smaller portion of that for partial-scholarship players. The money can be used for whatever student-athletes desire — rent, food, gas, airplane ticket home, entertainment, etc.

UND and NDSU have offered full cost of attendance to all of its scholarship athletes since 2016."



If you remember years ago Coach Choate brought up this huge disparity in trying to compete against them.

"Costello views cost of attendance as an extension of a scholarship or another form of financial aid. The athletic department will fundraise for it, he said, so MSU would rely on donations rather than state funds. Costello added that MSU’s possible offerings “could mean a lot of different things,” meaning partial cost of attendance may only be given at MSU initially.

Montana State spent $5.04 million in athletically-related student aid in the 2017-18 school year, according to U.S. Department of Education data, with $3.06 million going to male sports. As a whole, MSU teams spent $21.9 million, football spending $7.4 million, and brought in $22.3 million, with football making $9.1 million, in revenue.

Costello said he’s discussed cost of attendance possibilities since he first arrived in 2016, not just when Choate brought it up a month ago. He said his department carefully pondered the financial viability and the right steps in order to do so. He also emphasized not wanting the additional financial aid to disrupt the rest of MSU’s dealings."

https://www.idahostatejournal.com/s...cle_648d2623-321e-58f4-a206-5442e495b1c4.html

If you don't know how to play the NIL game and the Transfer Portal era, you are going to fall behind. That is evident. Gone are the days of just getting players because it is cool to run out of the tunnel to 25,000 plus screaming fans.
 
The NIL collective is very important to the overall success of Grizzly Athletics. Give whatever you can afford and more importantly on a re-occurring monthly basis. You can designate specific sports which is beneficial. This money helps Grizzly Athletics retain existing athletes and recruit new athletes. I know some might be fundamentally opposed to the idea but with all the changes this is one way to keep Grizzly athletics competitive and playing on the same level as other Universities in this new/ever-evolving environment.


The above article from 2022, are the Cats seeing the benefits and reaping the rewards of a much stronger NIL program at MSU currently? 80 football players were getting money/benefits back then? Is similar happening at UM?
 
Back
Top