indian-outlaw said:Half those guys were walk-ons, they came to him not the other way around. BH is a classless piece of crap and is showing his stuff at UNLV.
Bobby never had DDChief said:The most successful coach the griz ever had? That is don read actually bobby never won the big one.
Neither did Dennehy or cowboy Joe. Glenn had a better record than Hauck and won the NC.ranco said:Bobby never had DDChief said:The most successful coach the griz ever had? That is don read actually bobby never won the big one.
indian-outlaw said:Neither did Dennehy or cowboy Joe. Glenn had a better record than Hauck and won the NC.ranco said:Bobby never had DDChief said:The most successful coach the griz ever had? That is don read actually bobby never won the big one.
indian-outlaw said:Neither did Dennehy or cowboy Joe. Glenn had a better record than Hauck and won the NC.ranco said:Bobby never had DDChief said:The most successful coach the griz ever had? That is don read actually bobby never won the big one.
PeauxRouge said:indian-outlaw said:Neither did Dennehy or cowboy Joe. Glenn had a better record than Hauck and won the NC.ranco said:Bobby never had DDChief said:The most successful coach the griz ever had? That is don read actually bobby never won the big one.
What does Dennehy have to do with that?
kemajic said:Tuff Harris.citay said:if you've had little good to say about bobby hauck over the past several years, you've always had a seat next to me. not the charm of joe glenn. terrible with the press. never won the title game.
but wait a minute. maybe it's time to look at the talent level.
last year's secondary included tru, the highest draftee in our history, plus lisowski, who made a stir at the seahawks camp. then there was mcsurdy, who might yet play for the cowboys.
prior year, you could have mixed in jimmy wilson, now with the dolphins.
prior to that, colt and shan shillinger. plus kroy, mariani, carpenter and hilliard.
except for tru, these guys surprised us all with their achievements at the pro level. why, it was argued for years that montana kids couldn't even compete at the wac level, let alone the pro level. these kids showed the skeptics about the quality of montana football.
they were all hauck recruits.
as i look at our current roster, i wonder: are we looking at the football equivalent of a brain drain? is the talent simply not what it's been? did pflu recruiit to the level of hauck? can this staff?
hauck may be on thin ice at unlv. but he is unquestionably bringing up the talent level, and getting a lot of the local nevada kids to look again at staying home.
did we "misunderestimate" his recruiting talent?
from what I understand, Mariani came to UM to play tennis?AZGrizFan said:kemajic said:Tuff Harris.citay said:if you've had little good to say about bobby hauck over the past several years, you've always had a seat next to me. not the charm of joe glenn. terrible with the press. never won the title game.
but wait a minute. maybe it's time to look at the talent level.
last year's secondary included tru, the highest draftee in our history, plus lisowski, who made a stir at the seahawks camp. then there was mcsurdy, who might yet play for the cowboys.
prior year, you could have mixed in jimmy wilson, now with the dolphins.
prior to that, colt and shan shillinger. plus kroy, mariani, carpenter and hilliard.
except for tru, these guys surprised us all with their achievements at the pro level. why, it was argued for years that montana kids couldn't even compete at the wac level, let alone the pro level. these kids showed the skeptics about the quality of montana football.
they were all hauck recruits.
as i look at our current roster, i wonder: are we looking at the football equivalent of a brain drain? is the talent simply not what it's been? did pflu recruiit to the level of hauck? can this staff?
hauck may be on thin ice at unlv. but he is unquestionably bringing up the talent level, and getting a lot of the local nevada kids to look again at staying home.
did we "misunderestimate" his recruiting talent?
Except Mariani and Anderson (and possibly others) weren't "recruits"...they were walkons.
Yukon said:from what I understand, Mariani came to UM to play tennis?AZGrizFan said:kemajic said:Tuff Harris.citay said:if you've had little good to say about bobby hauck over the past several years, you've always had a seat next to me. not the charm of joe glenn. terrible with the press. never won the title game.
but wait a minute. maybe it's time to look at the talent level.
last year's secondary included tru, the highest draftee in our history, plus lisowski, who made a stir at the seahawks camp. then there was mcsurdy, who might yet play for the cowboys.
prior year, you could have mixed in jimmy wilson, now with the dolphins.
prior to that, colt and shan shillinger. plus kroy, mariani, carpenter and hilliard.
except for tru, these guys surprised us all with their achievements at the pro level. why, it was argued for years that montana kids couldn't even compete at the wac level, let alone the pro level. these kids showed the skeptics about the quality of montana football.
they were all hauck recruits.
as i look at our current roster, i wonder: are we looking at the football equivalent of a brain drain? is the talent simply not what it's been? did pflu recruiit to the level of hauck? can this staff?
hauck may be on thin ice at unlv. but he is unquestionably bringing up the talent level, and getting a lot of the local nevada kids to look again at staying home.
did we "misunderestimate" his recruiting talent?
Except Mariani and Anderson (and possibly others) weren't "recruits"...they were walkons.
AZGrizFan said:kemajic said:Tuff Harris.citay said:if you've had little good to say about bobby hauck over the past several years, you've always had a seat next to me. not the charm of joe glenn. terrible with the press. never won the title game.
but wait a minute. maybe it's time to look at the talent level.
last year's secondary included tru, the highest draftee in our history, plus lisowski, who made a stir at the seahawks camp. then there was mcsurdy, who might yet play for the cowboys.
prior year, you could have mixed in jimmy wilson, now with the dolphins.
prior to that, colt and shan shillinger. plus kroy, mariani, carpenter and hilliard.
except for tru, these guys surprised us all with their achievements at the pro level. why, it was argued for years that montana kids couldn't even compete at the wac level, let alone the pro level. these kids showed the skeptics about the quality of montana football.
they were all hauck recruits.
as i look at our current roster, i wonder: are we looking at the football equivalent of a brain drain? is the talent simply not what it's been? did pflu recruiit to the level of hauck? can this staff?
hauck may be on thin ice at unlv. but he is unquestionably bringing up the talent level, and getting a lot of the local nevada kids to look again at staying home.
did we "misunderestimate" his recruiting talent?
Except Mariani and Anderson (and possibly others) weren't "recruits"...they were walkons.
PlayerRep said:AZGrizFan said:kemajic said:Tuff Harris.citay said:if you've had little good to say about bobby hauck over the past several years, you've always had a seat next to me. not the charm of joe glenn. terrible with the press. never won the title game.
but wait a minute. maybe it's time to look at the talent level.
last year's secondary included tru, the highest draftee in our history, plus lisowski, who made a stir at the seahawks camp. then there was mcsurdy, who might yet play for the cowboys.
prior year, you could have mixed in jimmy wilson, now with the dolphins.
prior to that, colt and shan shillinger. plus kroy, mariani, carpenter and hilliard.
except for tru, these guys surprised us all with their achievements at the pro level. why, it was argued for years that montana kids couldn't even compete at the wac level, let alone the pro level. these kids showed the skeptics about the quality of montana football.
they were all hauck recruits.
as i look at our current roster, i wonder: are we looking at the football equivalent of a brain drain? is the talent simply not what it's been? did pflu recruiit to the level of hauck? can this staff?
hauck may be on thin ice at unlv. but he is unquestionably bringing up the talent level, and getting a lot of the local nevada kids to look again at staying home.
did we "misunderestimate" his recruiting talent?
Except Mariani and Anderson (and possibly others) weren't "recruits"...they were walkons.
Walk-ons are recruits (who don't get scholarships).
PeauxRouge said:PlayerRep said:AZGrizFan said:kemajic said:Tuff Harris.
Except Mariani and Anderson (and possibly others) weren't "recruits"...they were walkons.
Walk-ons are recruits (who don't get scholarships).
Seems that this part of recruiting his hard to understand.
Joe lost his first game and three of his last four. In between he was 38-2. He had Drew Miller and later Brandon Neill and didn't use him. BH had Ochs. He had two separate streaks of 23-1 and 24-1; impressive, but no chipper.indian-outlaw said:Neither did Dennehy or cowboy Joe. Glenn had a better record than Hauck and won the NC.ranco said:Bobby never had DDChief said:The most successful coach the griz ever had? That is don read actually bobby never won the big one.
:clap: :thumb: :clap:citay said:if you've had little good to say about bobby hauck over the past several years, you've always had a seat next to me. not the charm of joe glenn. terrible with the press. never won the title game.
but wait a minute. maybe it's time to look at the talent level.
last year's secondary included tru, the highest draftee in our history, plus lisowski, who made a stir at the seahawks camp. then there was mcsurdy, who might yet play for the cowboys.
prior year, you could have mixed in jimmy wilson, now with the dolphins.
prior to that, colt and shan shillinger. plus kroy, mariani, carpenter and hilliard.
except for tru, these guys surprised us all with their achievements at the pro level. why, it was argued for years that montana kids couldn't even compete at the wac level, let alone the pro level. these kids showed the skeptics about the quality of montana football.
they were all hauck recruits.
as i look at our current roster, i wonder: are we looking at the football equivalent of a brain drain? is the talent simply not what it's been? did pflu recruiit to the level of hauck? can this staff?
hauck may be on thin ice at unlv. but he is unquestionably bringing up the talent level, and getting a lot of the local nevada kids to look again at staying home.
did we "misunderestimate" his recruiting talent?
You must be 90 yrs old, Titleist. Your mind is so set on the history of UNLV that you can't imagine the school, no matter who is coach, having a good if not dominant football team. Get over it. Hauck is bringing that program along. Get over it. Oh, I forget.........you're a Cowboy. 'Nuff said. How's that team doing? :shock:MrTitleist said:Some jagoff on Twitter was arguing with me yesterday.. he was telling me how close UNLV is and blah blah blah.. I told him UNLV is a basketball school and football will never be successful there. So just for giggles I looked it up and sure enough I was right. I think I counted something like UNLV has had 7 winning seasons since 1980 and 16 in the history of their program. I don't think Hauck is the problem at UNLV.. definitely the city, school, and culture of football in Las Vegas.
citay said:if you've had little good to say about bobby hauck over the past several years, you've always had a seat next to me. not the charm of joe glenn. terrible with the press. never won the title game.
but wait a minute. maybe it's time to look at the talent level.
last year's secondary included tru, the highest draftee in our history, plus lisowski, who made a stir at the seahawks camp. then there was mcsurdy, who might yet play for the cowboys.
prior year, you could have mixed in jimmy wilson, now with the dolphins.
prior to that, colt and shan shillinger. plus kroy, mariani, carpenter and hilliard.
except for tru, these guys surprised us all with their achievements at the pro level. why, it was argued for years that montana kids couldn't even compete at the wac level, let alone the pro level. these kids showed the skeptics about the quality of montana football.
they were all hauck recruits.
as i look at our current roster, i wonder: are we looking at the football equivalent of a brain drain? is the talent simply not what it's been? did pflu recruiit to the level of hauck? can this staff?
hauck may be on thin ice at unlv. but he is unquestionably bringing up the talent level, and getting a lot of the local nevada kids to look again at staying home.
did we "misunderestimate" his recruiting talent?