Maybe the main difference is the UM bubble is designed to be taken down therefore the fabric integrity is not as durable as a permanent structureWere they circular or oblong?
And went forward with it when there were valid reasons not to. One of the weak spots of the university in taking the cheap way out instead of planning better.They built what they could afford.
What's your source and qualifications for the "completely ruined" conclusion?Bubble is completely ruined. I’d imagine a hefty lawsuit impending.
Multiple 10 foot long tears, metal support rods holding up the bubble broke the lighting and hvac systems probably need to be repairedWhat's your source and qualifications for the "completely ruined" conclusion?
Another griz fundraiserHow long before we find pieces of the bubble on eBay for sale?
Boise does not get the violent weather that Montana gets. That storm we had a few weeks ago as the first time I have felt like I was in MT since I left.Boise State has a bubble for indoor tennis and has no issues with tears or wind storms, does anybody have the engineering specifications on how the bubble is rated.
Not true, Boise gets violet T-storms, and has more weather extremes due to high heat. An inflatable bubble is a bad design, period.Boise does not get the violent weather that Montana gets. That storm we had a few weeks ago as the first time I have felt like I was in MT since I left.