Exactly—that’s the point. You admittedly are not nearly as connected to the program as Hoops but somehow claim to have a “more realistic” view simply because of some odd, subjective theory you believe which is unsubstantiated.
Are you still here, ranting away in your superior and virtue-signalling tone about what you do and don't tolerate on behalf of 'the public'? It's actually misogynistic of you to go on and on justifying your mansplaining because it implies that as a male you think you have to stand up for all females, implying that you don't think women are strong enough to stick up for themselves. You remind me of many douchnozzles in college who were always touting their women's rights advocacy badge to hit on women. Most of them were narcissistic control freaks. Look in the mirror.
Im not speaking for the public, I'm speaking for me. I don't tolerate misogyny to protect women from it, but to confront it because it is wrong. You should too, but it seems like maybe you condone it.
So just to be clear you think the guy that wrote the quote above is not a misogynist, but I am?
It was a bad call, in fact horrible call, by anyone. I asked why the crew didn't overrule her. Was it because she was a she, I asked.
Why?
Again, huh?
You don't know what misogyny is. I assume you don't know what a lot of things are. But I guess that's because you think you're Aristotle. That was pretty funny. You now have cemented your reputation, at least under that name, and virtually no one will take you serious on anything. You are now a complete joke. You don't tolerate misogyny. Especially on a football message board. And most on the message doesn't "tolerate" posters like you.
Because almost everyone in the stadium, including the closest official and I assume most of the crew, say how bad the call was. Normally, they would get together, discuss, and pick up the flag. That's why. If the flag had been thrown by a guy, I assume they would have had a discussion with him and told him he was wrong. That's also why.
SMFH, talk about making a leap.
If you aren't an insider, then you don't know what is going on in the inside and what the insiders, coaches, and players are saying and thinking. That's his point. I always think it's funny that some posters with no information like to jump people who do have the information.
hoops toeing the company line.
It is pretty small leap if you have a certain deeply ingrained subconscious bias.
It isn't making much of a leap to ask a question, and even if it is, I don't care. It's my view. And I know that you are too biased to know what you are talking about on the subject. You are just a lead-first prick guy, even when there is no reason or no history or no one jumped you. You just lead that way. That's why some people don't like you and your posting.
hoops, you are correct, not much of a leap if you have a deep seeded issue, one from your core, to blame it on the official being a woman.
Does this mean we're not friends?
I didn't blame the call on the official being a woman. I only asked why the crew didn't overrule her, and if it was because she was a woman. I doubt that many male posters on the board have done more for women in their careers and life than I have. I am completely comfortable with the support I have given to women in my professional and personal life, and so are the multiple women in my family. MTBornFan doesn't know anything about football, and is a social justice warrior and, in my view, a total idiot and know-nothing. He may be an okay guy. He is fairly polite on the board. I enjoyed running him around in circles. While you are a dick too often, you at least know something about football. If you changed your personality, you might be a good poster. Ha.
Like I said earlier, impressively obtuse.
Ya, right. You got into college because you checked the AI box.
