horribilisfan8184
Well-known member
PlayerRep said:garizzalies said:Let me help you guys out. I think I figured out the "motive" for the "set-up." Chuck Morrell must have known Traitorak would someday be a finalist for the Tech job and wanted to preemptively torpedo his career. So Chuck was the one that stole the goods, followed him to the hotel, somehow broke in and planted the stolen goods without being spotted or waking up Traitor. But it doesn't stop there. Chuck did not want to get caught up in this so he did not spring the trap directly. Instead, he knew--because traitorak is such an ethical person--that Traitorak would turn himself in. Makes perfect sense!UMGriz75 said:Most of your "evidence" is negative; that somehow the absence of video, testimony, tangible physical evidence is just "proof" of how good Gregorak is as a stone cold drunk cat burglar, apparently. He was just that good! actually, you got that 100% backwards. The traitorak defenders are the ones claiming no video of this or that. I point to the actual circumstantial evidence that really did exist (the gun and wallet themselves), yet you guys simply ignore that each time
And he knows whose car is who's in a supervised parking lot and goes right to it! No need to know who's car is who's. It's called "car hopping." Usually done by young thugs, they simply walk around trying car doors until they find one that's unlocked.
How would he know there was anything in the car? How would he know the car? why does he need to know the car or if anything is in there? I don't think you understand how car hopping works. You try the car door handle, if it opens, you grab what you can and move on
...
And, if guilty, why would Gregorak return anything? he sobered up. Happens all the time, but usually you wake up with a "coyote ugly" and not a felony .
Now, you're starting to say stuff that is just plain dumb.
There is zero direct evidence. Circumstantial evidence almost never convicts anyone.
Sure, he was just out going through cars looking to steal stuff? Even you can't be stupid enough to think that.
No, it doesn't happen all the time that someone who stole something like a gun/wallet/sunglasses, etc. out of a car whose owner he doesn't know, wakes up the next morning, and returns it. In fact, I wonder if that has ever happened even once.
If I was a bouncer at a strip club, I don't think I'd leave my gun and my wallet in my car while on shift. If not on me, they would be within reach.
This does have the smell of a set-up or bad prank.