albinogriz said:
AZGrizFan said:
... Agreed 100%. That's why it's not his "system" that's the issue. Now, comment on his actual COACHING might be correct...he (and his DC) failed to get their teams ready to play yesterday. It showed in all phases of the game.
Agree... He might have a barn burner of an offensive game plan.... But getting the kids to execute it is another matter. With the mistakes they're making I believe
most of it's mental and that's on the coaches.
Now, I'm going to wing one here ... but it's been a thought on my mind since Stitt was hired. And I love the Stitt hire. It's brought new excitement and recognition to the program that we have not seen for some time.
Here's my winger: For 15 years Stitt coached guys who took everything they do pretty seriously. That's not to say that engineering students don't party, but it's generally pretty low-key and not something they take to extremes -- they're too busy studying their a**es off for much of that.
Now he has a more "typical" mix of student-athletes, many of whom
do like to party, kick back for bull sessions, and all that. He took some stern measures early on to squelch the more egregious stupidities, and that was good. But having said that, I worry that Stitt's experience with
really serious student-athletes did not quite prepare him for a subset of athletes who might not have the level of commitment that he could take for granted at Mines. That could mean he should be bearing down a little (lot?) more than he's used to. If so, that's another learning curve for Stitt as a coach at this level -- but he's clearly a really smart guy and that will come too.
Just a thought.