BadlandsGrizFan
Well-known member
Allezchat said:BadlandsGrizFan said:Allezchat said:So is it possible that Ty was retained with the intention that he would be a one and done? That he was retained to provide some continuity to the recruits and the players? That nothing nefarious went on. It was kind of looked at to be a mentorship role to Semore. That the plan was for him to gradually take over the D and then become the new DC this year? I wonder if there is something similar happening with the coaches retained by Choate. Is there some sort of agreement where they stay a year for that continuity but it is under the realization that it will be a year thing and then they will look elsewhere. Is that the reason for the switch from a D-line coach to a TE coach?
Since you guys are in the business of disparaging nicknames for our coaches, I think we ought to nickname Mr. Semore, Mr. Butts. Semore....Semore Butts. Yeah, not too original, but I like it.
How about Semore Wins
Come on. I expect better than that from you. You can get more creative than that. How bout Semore points allowed than ever?
Really, though. I am curious about the first part of my post.
Hard to say unless you were one of the two guys i guess, I have an idea that when Stitt got here he knew he would not be keeping Ty, but thought a year under his system just to get the little things and aquantances that go into coaching may be good for Semore? I think I probably would have done the same thing, new coach, enough shaking things up in the first year, keep Ty a year to ease the transition, total clean slate to begin 2016.