Stitt on Strahm....

[Man1]

So, so many pious people! I think we have, way bigger concerns with Bob Stitt than we do Connor Strahm!!! They canned Jeome Sauers at NAU, mid season, who was doing a much better job than Stitt! We got fire in the kitchen Bobby stay in touch, coach!!! Let's get real here folks! Let Connor have his day in court and let the judicial system handle this, misdemeanor, like everyone else! To hell with Krackwhore, who cares what he writes. He shouldn't influence what we do here at Montana,especially, with our football players, the guys a money hungry "Geek! He's still trying to make money off of JJ

The stupid is strong in this one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You should look in the mirror. Pot meet kettle

 

[PlayerRep]

For those that can't do stats in their head:

Year-over-year pct change from the previous year
2009: -7.41%
2010: +3.21%
2011: -10.5%
2012: -13.13%
2013: +1.55%
2014: +6.16%
2015: -12.78%
2016: -10.24%

Change each year relative to 2008 high:
2009: -7.41%
2010: -4.44%
2011: -14.51%
2012: -25.73%
2013: -24.58%
2014: -19.94%
2015: -30.17%
2016: -37.32%

Which stats are you showing? Please identify.

 

[tnt]

For those that can't do stats in their head:

Year-over-year pct change from the previous year
2009: -7.41%
2010: +3.21%
2011: -10.5%
2012: -13.13%
2013: +1.55%
2014: +6.16%
2015: -12.78%
2016: -10.24%

Change each year relative to 2008 high:
2009: -7.41%
2010: -4.44%
2011: -14.51%
2012: -25.73%
2013: -24.58%
2014: -19.94%
2015: -30.17%
2016: -37.32%

Which stats are you showing? Please identify.

Those are the same stats we have been talking about. You have been looking at raw numbers. Sometimes raw numbers may be expressed in percentages and such but that's not stats either. There is a wee bit more math involved. In fact the stats you show to prove a point are frequently still raw data and when broken down into actual statistics may or may not do what you think. I work with actual stats regularly so sadly can do them in my head. Uofmman111 simply did the math for you. I made the mistake of thinking you knew how to do one of the simpler formulas for "trends" or " prediction " or see those trends automatically given the frequency you use stats to make a point.

 

[PlayerRep]

For those that can't do stats in their head:

Year-over-year pct change from the previous year
2009: -7.41%
2010: +3.21%
2011: -10.5%
2012: -13.13%
2013: +1.55%
2014: +6.16%
2015: -12.78%
2016: -10.24%

Change each year relative to 2008 high:
2009: -7.41%
2010: -4.44%
2011: -14.51%
2012: -25.73%
2013: -24.58%
2014: -19.94%
2015: -30.17%
2016: -37.32%

Which stats are you showing? Please identify.

Those are the same stats we have been talking about. You have been looking at raw numbers. Sometimes raw numbers may be expressed in percentages and such but that's not stats either. There is a wee bit more math involved. In fact the stats you show to prove a point are frequently still raw data and when broken down into actual statistics may or may not do what you think. I work with actual stats regularly so sadly can do them in my head. Uofmman111 simply did the math for you. I made the mistake of thinking you knew how to do one of the simpler formulas for "trends" or " prediction " or see those trends automatically given the frequency you use stats to make a point.

We been looking at 2 different stats: the whole university and frosh. I asked which these were. Yes, I know he did the math, but on what?