This conference needs a championship game for christs sakeGriz!ron said:They might be the dark horse for a Big Sky Conference champ, As they don't play UM, EWU or ISU.
http://www.bigskyconf.com/calendar.aspx?path=football&season=2014&
I'd love to see them beat the cats in November. Cal Poly may also give them some trouble.hm.grwn.grizfan said:This conference needs a championship game for christs sakeGriz!ron said:They might be the dark horse for a Big Sky Conference champ, As they don't play UM, EWU or ISU.
http://www.bigskyconf.com/calendar.aspx?path=football&season=2014&
WAaggieFan said:I won't say their D wasn't good but that weird result is almost 100% on a pathetic offensive performance by the Aggies.
There are some key players on 2 game suspension and a key offensive weapon that was dismissed from the team earlier. In addition what seemed to be a deep receiver corps has already been plagued by some injuries beginning in fall camp and doesn't look to be that deep right now.
However, IMO, there are some serious issues on Utah State's OL that have been somewhat evident since 2013 and didn't look even close to being resolved last night.
I don't know what the takeaway is other than I don't think the SUU D's strength can be determined by last night's outcome and USU's lack of any offensive points.
IDK. Maybe their D is that tough and it wasn't a fluky underperformance for Utah State. Which, if that's the case, means it will be a long season for Aggie fans with the schedule the squad faces and an offense that struggles to put points on the board. The Ute D next week definitely won't be weaker than SUU's was....
AZGrizFan said:Apparently SUU's D didn't make the flight to Brookings...
Ask MSU fans if SDSU wasn't pretty good last year. The MVC was 4-0 vs. the BSC last weekend.bgbigdog said:Could SDSU be the real deal? I know it was just Kansas to start, but the spanking they put on SUU was impressive. Big tilt with the "N" in two weeks.
kemajic said:The MVC was 4-0 vs. the BSC last weekend.
Not a bloodbath. USU moved the ball fairly well on the Utes. My conclusion is that SUU D wasn't the cause of pathetic Aggie O performance.CV Griz Fan said:WAaggieFan said:I won't say their D wasn't good but that weird result is almost 100% on a pathetic offensive performance by the Aggies.
There are some key players on 2 game suspension and a key offensive weapon that was dismissed from the team earlier. In addition what seemed to be a deep receiver corps has already been plagued by some injuries beginning in fall camp and doesn't look to be that deep right now.
However, IMO, there are some serious issues on Utah State's OL that have been somewhat evident since 2013 and didn't look even close to being resolved last night.
I don't know what the takeaway is other than I don't think the SUU D's strength can be determined by last night's outcome and USU's lack of any offensive points.
IDK. Maybe their D is that tough and it wasn't a fluky underperformance for Utah State. Which, if that's the case, means it will be a long season for Aggie fans with the schedule the squad faces and an offense that struggles to put points on the board. The Ute D next week definitely won't be weaker than SUU's was....
Ya think? Blood bath in SLC....