I don't need you to correct me on anything. We aren't in school and you aren't teaching anything. I don't understand why you need to feel you are the final authority about everything anyone says on here, people make incorrect comments and you are certainly not above this. The point of the original post was that FBS losses don't count and my point was all of them are considered, just let it go and give your hypertension a rest.
Actually, you do need to be corrected. You keep saying that same incorrect thing over and over. I am the final authority on the D2 thing on here, because I literally went to the Committee last year, (2 prior heads of the committee and the then current head of the committee) and they told me, and then clarified things in interviews. Haslam spoke on it. Hero Sports and others covered it. Hero Sports admitted that they had been wrong. Why can't you accept an absolute fact that has been clearly stated by the selection committee?
If you feel that I owe you any kind of apology, let me give you one from a bunch of people on here.
My feelings are never hurt. I'm way tougher than most (on a message board). It hasn't nothing to do with disagreeing. I am trying to correct your incorrect statement about a pet peeve of mine. Why can't you just admit that you are wrong. Look up what Hero eventually said. Look up Haslam's interview. Saying I communicated with 3 current or former chairs of the playoff committee last year, is not name-dropping. It is showing that I got my answer from the right people. I have never said anyone needs me, but there are not many people who have the information I have and most people appreciate it. Again, I don't get offended. I set the record straight. You are just jealous because you never played at any good level.
Thank you for the information, in all sincerity.
You have been the personal shots guy with me, and you are being the whining baby now. You can't even admit that you are wrong on D2 games in playoff selection, so you have to keep snipping at me, let alone on the other incorrect things you say. I actually also played 100 years ago, as I had said earlier, on the undefeated and national championship 1925 Dartmouth team. And, of the 9 people (with marriages) from my family who have now attended Dartmouth, we've had a football and rugby player (and several time intramural 100 winner), a heavyweight crew woman, the captain of the '71 heavyweight crew, a frosh football and then rugby player, my football nephew who also ran the indoor 40, and a co-captain of the women's rugby team. Thanks, Tourist. I'll send you a PM with a bunch of NIL info.
Why would anyone even ask the original question? Who cares what the record of a playoff team is after the playoff committee evaluates the teams and situation and makes their decisions? I find the question to be ridiculous beyond belief. A similar question would be: should teams that wear black jerseys be allowed to make the playoff field in 2025?
Well, I don't know, Mr. Chief Critic. Comments on this "ridiculous" question have now gone on for four pages. Not always really on topic ... that's a verifiable fact, but there it is. I would like to see it die a natural (?) death.
FWIW, I made my comment (reluctantly) to point out that the selection committee has their work cut out for them to sift through the records of many likely candidates. And then comes the seeding. 
Do you want me to tell everyone what I think of most of those ridiculous comments?Well, I don't know, Mr. Chief Critic. Comments on this "ridiculous" question have now gone on for four pages. Not always really on topic ... that's a verifiable fact, but there it is. I would like to see it die a natural (?) death.
Why not? I'll just consider the source. You do provide good information now and then, so I have not put you on "Ignore." Still, that's a temptation, since your main goal seems to be to insult as many people as possible. Carry on.
yes, and all their games should be played at night, under overcast skies, and with no lights illuminating the field.
I provide good info all the time. As much as anyone on the board. You either can’t identify good info or don’t know what good info is. Yes, I can see comments indicating someone didn’t play the game or has said something stupid. Most of the time those comments are directed at posters who have jumped at me and are not my favorites or are trolls. Don’t think you and I have tangled.
But you probably didn’t ask “should”. You probably asked “will”. That is a different question than should.
i asked "is it likely a 7-5 team playing in fcs football this year will make the playoffs". i think the "will" in my sentence is placed differently than in your proposed query.
Please.
They don't know what they are talking about and/or never played the game.
