• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Second Griz Player Now a Person of Interest

i_the_sky said:
SAD! Now there is more than one player that Haslam and Stitt will turn their backs on!! No family here! Family doesn't turn on family!! These two bums are not Montana!!! Karma will get them both fired! I pray!!!

Griz1952, are you now i_the_sky ?
 
Lakerhater said:
i_the_sky said:
SAD! Now there is more than one player that Haslam and Stitt will turn their backs on!! No family here! Family doesn't turn on family!! These two bums are not Montana!!! Karma will get them both fired! I pray!!!

Griz1952, are you now i_the_sky ?

It's Friday
someone has to b 'band'
giphy.gif
 
retiredpopo said:
I am amazed when I read thru this thread. The student athlete code of conduct is pretty straight forward and easy to understand. Do people really think that Stitt sets the rules and lays down the punishment? For one thing Stitt needs to win as his job depends on it. If he knew he could keep any good player from being suspended don't you think he would do whatever was in his power to keep that player on the field?
I think the Griz athletic department has had the NCAA and DOJ breathing down their throats so sure they will be walking on thin ice. Also not one person here knows exactly what JS has told the coach or the AD.

Don't think that the ncaa or DOJ ever had anything to do with this particular subject, other than ncaa would not want a Griz parent who was also a booster putting up 10% for a week to bail out the player, or a booster or his law firm representing Strong for free. That's what the ncaa found UM to have done wrong. The DOJ looked at sexual assault handling at UM. The ncaa didn't. Obviously, there is no sexual assault in this matter anyway.

Now, I agree generally with what you just said in your first para, but I think many posters believe that Stitt is so focused on character and against bad behavior that he might encourage or go along with early/strong punishment to send a message to the particular players and the team. This would be a great example to so analyze, and the tension and conflict that you point out is very real in this situation.

Good post.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
signedbewildered said:
Question is....why were they (supposedly) wearing Washington State garb? I think that's what I heard unless some drunk kids got their story wrong. That's as disturbing as anything.

#incognito


This confusion would've never happened if UM went back to the original colors.

CheerfulYoungArabianoryx-max-1mb.gif
Well, they weren’t supposed to leave anyways and they were at a Wazzu game... Why would they wanna stand out? Plus they were there supporting Justin’s lil brother while he played...
 
Back
Top