Well until said poster can prove they know what they're talking about I'll fee free to challenge away. Because until then it's pure conjecture and fear mongering.PlayerRep said:HelenaHandBasket said:PlayerRep said:HelenaHandBasket said:But it is very plausible that KVA being a Grad Asst at MSU has zero to do with Stitt or how he feels about Stitt, which is how fanofzoo is portraying it. It could be 100% about his relationship with TG. I think the point is, fanofzoo automatically puts everything on the shoulders of Stitt whether it is actually factual or not, and on this subject, he has really provided nothing that would suggest this move by KVA is a Stitt issue.
I agree with you. However, I know more about the subject than I will post. Don't think you should conclude that the original poster doesn't know more too. He may, or may not.
PR, not trying to argue what people do or don't know. But why make a post like the OP without providing anything substantive? Provide a little more than "because of our "coach" and how he works".
Don't know. Maybe it's just his view or assumption. Maybe he's speculating. Maybe he knows more than what he said, but doesn't want to say it. Maybe he talked to KVA when he was in town, Orto someone who had talked directly to KVA. While it's fine to ask questions or why he thinks or said what he did, but, if one doesn't know, I don't think it's right to tell the OP that he's wrong. I'm not saying you did this. I didn't re-read the posts. My comment is more of a general comment, i.e. that I see posters who appear not to know what they are talking about, challenging posters who either know or may know what they are talking about.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk