wbtfg
Well-known member
#15 Fan said:wbtfg said:loyalgriz said:wbtfg said:Carroll is certainly in a unique situation in recruiting athletes. There are very few catholic schools in the west that offer a football program. I don't think there are any in Idaho, Washington, Portland, Colorado...etc. (I could certainly be wrong about that).
Also, when you look at some of the top prep high school programs in those states, the catholic schools tend to be near the top.
Additionally, Carroll is a fairly strong (I wouldn't say extremely strong) academic school.
This provides MVD with a huge recruiting advantage.
You are right in saying that CC has its recruiting advantage such as facilities, etc. What you are forgetting is one distinct disadvantage.......the cost of school. The cost of roughly $26,000 per year is a deterrent to many. CC has approximately 25 scholarships to divy up between the entire roster. Starters are not typically getting more than half athletic scholarship, so it pays off for MVD to get good students who qualify for academic help as well. Ten years ago before MVD got there the roster was comprised of 40 kids, who mostly left after the season was over. 9 years later the roster is over 100 kids willing to pay top dollar to play for him. CC is not an option for a kid who can't afford to go there, so they lose some kids. I shudder to think what MVD could do recruiting wise if he could offer every kid decent money. he also has shown a penchant for finding diamonds in the rough with an obvious eye for talent.
The cost is $26k/year, but it is a private school, and pretty much everyone receives aid. I believe Carroll discounts tuition heavily, especially for "high achieving" kids.
After everything is said and done, I would doubt that the average Carroll student pays much more than the average MSU or UM in-state student.
You gotta be f*****g kidding me!! Tell you what, I'll let you pay my student loans off for me, then tell me that an in-state UM student pays as much as I do. I graduated in the top 30 out of 532 students in HS, and I got a scholarship that paid about $5000/year (Bishop's Grant). Had I played a sport and was offered a scholly for it, it would've been around $5000, maybe less depending on the sport. The catch with the Bishop's Grant is that you cannot accept it AND the athletic scholly in the same year. Why? I haven't the foggiest clue, but my lil bro got screwed by that every year. Oh, and the "aid" that you receive is in the form of Stafford Subsidized Loans. All that means is that you don't accrue interest until you're done with school...oh wait, that's also offered to in-state UM/MSU kids. We receive more money in Stafford loans, but it's all figured in percentages. So before you go spouting off about how Carroll is as affordable as UM, do just a little bit of research.
Ok my mistake...I didn't do a shred of research...I'm just going by friends of mine that went to carroll. Many of them, through academic and/or athletic money, ended up paying similar costs as they would at a state school. I thought that Carroll gave out a lot more aid than that...my bad.
Question(s): Were the student loans worth it? If you had to do it all over again, would you go to a public school, or would you go back to Carroll?
How about if you didn't play sports, is the academic quality at Carroll worth the extra $10k/year?