• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Reporting Live! From bozo

Status
Not open for further replies.
:?
Alaska Griz said:
It's clear you really have no concern for anything relating to Montana, the Bozeman community, or the way public employees conduct themselves, nor accountability by MSU's leaders. You likely dropped out of high school to become an internet troll and happen to root for the bobcats. That's fine. But at least understand, some folks DO care about these things. Not everything in life is about FCS football and cats or griz. Your lack of intellect is depressing, but there's no need to advertise it to the world.

Actually, he dropped out of middle school to become a welder. Works at Port of Alaska. Could be your neighbor.
 
mthoopsfan said:
poorgriz said:
So you're saying Colter is full of Shi* too?

"The entire university has a protocol for exactly how to deal with these sorts of cases, and there's been a lot of vitriol that says these guys are just trying to sweep it under the rug. No, what they're trying to do is not get sued."

No, I am saying you are full of poop.
I think they are both full of shit. I think the reporter is just talking out his you know what like most of this crap. There’s never any links or cites for support. I can’t think of a single state policy that’s not public knowledge.

I love the garbage about these drunk coordinators suing MSDUi if they got fired. They would have been laughed out of court. I believe wrongful termination damages in MT are limited to 4 years of wages. Big whoop. That’s peanuts compared the damage to the reputation of msdui at this point
 
3-7-77 said:
:?
Alaska Griz said:
It's clear you really have no concern for anything relating to Montana, the Bozeman community, or the way public employees conduct themselves, nor accountability by MSU's leaders. You likely dropped out of high school to become an internet troll and happen to root for the bobcats. That's fine. But at least understand, some folks DO care about these things. Not everything in life is about FCS football and cats or griz. Your lack of intellect is depressing, but there's no need to advertise it to the world.

Actually, he dropped out of middle school to become a welder. Works at Port of Alaska. Could be your neighbor.

I am in Missoula all fall. Usually on the Kenai when I am in AK. I avoid Anchorage as much as I can.
 
CatsRback said:
ilovethecats said:
Ya I didn't read it that way at all. I read it meaning here are the best teams since 2012, and asking what it will look like 10 years from now. I didn't read the graphic as showing the tiers of what it will look like 10 years from now.

It’s not you it’s oredigger…. It’s literally stating the top tiers the last 10 years (with accuracy) and the caption is asking how the next 10 will go. Basically allowing for the forum to comment who will dethrone NDSU.

Who’s Oredigger?

Once again this the comments by Bobcat fans prove how they simply can’t grasp the obvious. There is a reason that the MSU Dean’s list is full of Montana Tech washouts and those that failed. Intelligence via reading comprehension is not in play with comments about that graphic.

I love how they think that the past performance (since 2012) of JMU and Sam Houston Stare are indicative of how they will perform in the FCS the next ten years.

You can’t make this sh** up.

Once again, if you want to show how a team will perform next 10 years, don’t use a historic graph showing past performance for teams not in the division. They are probably trying to determine how USC and Oregon are going to perform in the PAC-12 the next ten years too. That’s Cat Logic.

The irony is, I’ve never mentioned anything about the Bobcats or the Grizzlies. Lol
 
ordigger said:
CatsRback said:
It’s not you it’s oredigger…. It’s literally stating the top tiers the last 10 years (with accuracy) and the caption is asking how the next 10 will go. Basically allowing for the forum to comment who will dethrone NDSU.

Who’s Oredigger?

Once again this the comments by Bobcat fans prove how they simply can’t grasp the obvious. There is a reason that the MSU Dean’s list is full of Montana Tech washouts and those that failed. Intelligence via reading comprehension is not in play with comments about that graphic.

I love how they think that the past performance (since 2012) of JMU and Sam Houston Stare are indicative of how they will perform in the FCS the next ten years.

You can’t make this sh** up.

Once again, if you want to show how a team will perform next 10 years, don’t use a historic graph showing past performance for teams not in the division. They are probably trying to determine how USC and Oregon are going to perform in the PAC-12 the next ten years too. That’s Cat Logic.

The irony is, I’ve never mentioned anything about the Bobcats or the Grizzlies. Lol

You still aren’t seeing it. Woof.
 
CatsRback said:
ordigger said:
Who’s Oredigger?

Once again this the comments by Bobcat fans prove how they simply can’t grasp the obvious. There is a reason that the MSU Dean’s list is full of Montana Tech washouts and those that failed. Intelligence via reading comprehension is not in play with comments about that graphic.

I love how they think that the past performance (since 2012) of JMU and Sam Houston Stare are indicative of how they will perform in the FCS the next ten years.

You can’t make this sh** up.

Once again, if you want to show how a team will perform next 10 years, don’t use a historic graph showing past performance for teams not in the division. They are probably trying to determine how USC and Oregon are going to perform in the PAC-12 the next ten years too. That’s Cat Logic.

The irony is, I’ve never mentioned anything about the Bobcats or the Grizzlies. Lol

I’m still not seeing it. Woof.

FIFY
 
It is so blatantly obvious why this is such a big deal over here: failure loves company.

The Griz have been in the loser’s seat for several years since the rape scandal tore apart the football team and eventually the university itself. There was a New York Times Best Seller book about it. MSU has been kicking ass in every institutional aspect. You are jealous of that success and CRAVE a reason for MSU to fail.

40+ pages about this is completely shameful, delusional jealousy.
 
Counter Assault said:
It is so blatantly obvious why this is such a big deal over here: failure loves company.

The Griz have been in the loser’s seat for several years since the rape scandal tore apart the football team and eventually the university itself. There was a New York Times Best Seller book about it. MSU has been kicking ass in every institutional aspect. You are jealous of that success and CRAVE a reason for MSU to fail.

40+ pages about this is completely shameful, delusional jealousy.

Fuck off
 
Counter Assault said:
It is so blatantly obvious why this is such a big deal over here: failure loves company.

The Griz have been in the loser’s seat for several years since the rape scandal tore apart the football team and eventually the university itself. There was a New York Times Best Seller book about it. MSU has been kicking ass in every institutional aspect. You are jealous of that success and CRAVE a reason for MSU to fail.

40+ pages about this is completely shameful, delusional jealousy.

So you really don't believe your coaches, or anyone, should be held accountable for all the DUI's? Just say that, and we'll understand where you're coming from. Sorry your administration is screwing the pooch and creating a shitstorm for themselves. It clearly bothers you that it could affect your program going forward, and rightfully so.

The Griz are on the rise right now in major sports, and will be favorites against the cats in both men's and women's basketball this year. Thanks for stopping by!
 
The problem is the extensions and raises after the incidents.

Nothing is stopping parasite "cotton" Colter from asking why those coaches got extensions and raises. He doesn't even have to bring up the incidents in doing so.

It would be particularly easy regarding guzzlin Garza as their defense isn't exactly setting the fcs on fire...

He won't do it because he is soft.

And, any reporter worth their paycheck would ask those questions regardless of the directions prior to a press conference. Put them on record publicly.

So lame.
 
poorgriz said:
I know it's difficult for most of you to grasp, but pretty much everything they said in this podcast is dead on accurate. Whey are so many griz fans freaking out over this and demanding answers NOW!!!? JEALOUSY.

MSU Admins told reporters directly that they are not answering questions on these matters until after the court proceedings. So do you really want Colter and others to throw those questions out at every interview to hear Vigen, Costello, or Crusado say, "No comment at this time."? What good would that do?

So that takes us to your anger over the MSU administration. They have a very specific protocol in place to deal with these legal matters. There are a lot of reasons for the protocols, not the least of which is protecting the university from lawsuits. The Kramer debacle paved the way for this, and they're damn sure not going to make that mistake again.

Not sure why all this is so hard for some of you to understand.

That Nuanez felt the need to devote most of the podcast to defending his journalistic integrity is sad, but understandable. I can see how folks would be confused with how this has played out in the media, given he admitted that he works on both sides of the content process, "just the news" on his website and news and commentary on his radio show. He can say what he wants, in whatever forum. It's up to us whether or not we want to consume it, or not. That said, I don't disagree fundamentally with anything he said in his defense thus far. We can get off his ass for anything here, because he won't cut off his nose to spite his face. No one should expect him to.

Clearly, as you've pointed out, there are policies and procedures to support organizations who find themselves in the position of having one or more employees who have been arrested for any reason. In this case, employees plural. It would be mismanagement not to have these things in place. We're on the same page to this point, I would assume.

What I have a hard time understanding, and it seems you have as well, is standing firm behind the need to follow "protocol" when it comes to the legal entanglements based on the actions of it's employees when not long after the incidents, there are contract renewals and raises announced for the two. You see how that looks, don't you? Or is that difficult for you to grasp? A competent administration, with competent legal advice, from the chancellor of the university through to the head ball coach would have had the sense to put that aside until the sacred process they cite every time the question is asked, would have played itself out.

Not sure why this is so hard for you to understand. Because if Garza is convicted, for a third time, and he stays on staff, they deserve all the shit thrown at them from anywhere.
 
Why wouldn’t MSU want to have certainty that they will have their coaches? If the DC is convicted, doesn’t he have to be fired?

Why does MSU want to put up with this long uncertainty and all this negative stuff and criticism?
 
mthoopsfan said:
Why wouldn’t MSU want to have certainty that they will have their coaches? If the DC is convicted, doesn’t he have to be fired?

Why does MSU want to put up with this long uncertainty and all this negative stuff and criticism?

That's easy, speedy trial. "Mont. Code Ann. 46-13-401(2)..." City of Helena v. Grove, 387 Mont. 378, 394 P.3d 189 (Mont. 2017)
 
What I find remarkably telling is that with all these bub fans spouting off, not one -- NOT ONE -- has defended either the coaches' actions or the handling by MsdUi. Because, of course, there is no defense for either. They go on and on about shit that doesn't matter, but not one of them can excuse the actions or the way MsdUi has handled it.

Shameful.
 
horribilisfan8184 said:
mthoopsfan said:
Why wouldn’t MSU want to have certainty that they will have their coaches? If the DC is convicted, doesn’t he have to be fired?

Why does MSU want to put up with this long uncertainty and all this negative stuff and criticism?

That's easy, speedy trial. "Mont. Code Ann. 46-13-401(2)..." City of Helena v. Grove, 387 Mont. 378, 394 P.3d 189 (Mont. 2017)

Huh?
 
EverettGriz said:
What I find remarkably telling is that with all these bub fans spouting off, not one -- NOT ONE -- has defended either the coaches' actions or the handling by MsdUi. Because, of course, there is no defense for either. They go on and on about poop that doesn't matter, but not one of them can excuse the actions or the way MsdUi has handled it.

Shameful.

Their hands are tied by their timidity and their stupidity.
 
Counter Assault said:
It is so blatantly obvious why this is such a big deal over here: failure loves company.

The Griz have been in the loser’s seat for several years since the rape scandal tore apart the football team and eventually the university itself. There was a New York Times Best Seller book about it. MSU has been kicking ass in every institutional aspect. You are jealous of that success and CRAVE a reason for MSU to fail.

40+ pages about this is completely shameful, delusional jealousy.

Funny. I've known scat fans for decades, AND THEY NEVER CHANGE. Obnoxious sh*theads, like yourself. At that, I started my collegiate experience in Bozo. No sh*t! Attended my first football game in Gatton Field, the Griz-scat game. There's only ONE class act in Montana, and its not in bozo. Go back to BN.
 
mthoopsfan said:
horribilisfan8184 said:
That's easy, speedy trial. "Mont. Code Ann. 46-13-401(2)..." City of Helena v. Grove, 387 Mont. 378, 394 P.3d 189 (Mont. 2017)

Huh?

Since this is more than 300 days past citation, without a speedy trial waiver there might not be a charge pending. Given the number of experienced litigators who left when this attorney with not one trial under her belt was elected, I can see this deadline getting blown. Maybe even let to slide ala Hunter Biden's prosecutors. Maybe Garizzlies can stick his nose in the Court file on his next trip to Blowsman and let us know if the prosecutor(s) is competent.
 
horribilisfan8184 said:
mthoopsfan said:

Since this is more than 300 days past citation, without a speedy trial waiver there might not be a charge pending. Given the number of experienced litigators who left when this attorney with not one trial under her belt was elected, I can see this deadline getting blown. Maybe even let to slide ala Hunter Biden's prosecutors. Maybe Garizzlies can stick his nose in the Court file on his next trip to Blowsman and let us know if the prosecutor(s) is competent.

The opinion clarifies that the clock begins to run on the day after the plea is entered. IDK when he entered his plea.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top