• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Post game: Improvements

BWahlberg

Well-known member
DONOR
A day late here, I had a lot of friends in town and couldn't get to posting yesterday. I did want to share my thoughts as I watched the Griz offense open up all over the Vikings. Looking back at what I posted in the scouting report:

Do your 1/11

Tough call. You can spin this both ways. The Griz D held the highest scoring offense to 27 points, where they average 41 usually, they forced 4 turnovers and 2 additional red zone stops. On the other hand they gave up 511 yards, almost 400 through the air, had two pretty bad breakdowns on passing TDs and showed issues with containing runners, arm tackles, and taking bad angles to ball-carriers. I'm ever the positive guy and quite frankly if the defense can create this many turnovers (6 essentially with the RZ stops) then I'm happy.

Win the turnover battle

Done

Prevent the deep ball.

Had a few too many issues with letting a receiver get behind the coverage. The deep TD to Dean late, the trick TD to Richard. They had some bigger passing plays on our defense. Not sure if it was safety confusion or the defense by design there to put the corners more 1 on 1 a lot. Although Chief had an incredible game, but I'll come back to that.

Light up the scoreboard

Done. I liked the aggressive approach from the offense, trying to add more points with about 1 minute to go in the half, and the continual attack until it was crystal clear who was winning the game.

Let PSU shoot themselves in the foot

I posted this thought on twitter but I'll say it again, I don't know if I've ever seen such an undisciplined coaching regime as I have seen under the Nigel Burton term as head coach. PSU's continual stupid and borderline dirty plays hurt them so bad early. And it has for 4 continual years now. You'd think they'd want to correct that because it's costing them games. PSU had 108 penalty yards (3 of which were personal fouls), the Griz had 15.

Protect Jordy

This was done two-fold, first of all the O-line showed up and were much improved on the field yesterday. Secondly Jordy showed much better pocket presence and ran the ball when there were no options or heavy pressure. Good improvement all around

Dominate on special teams

Not really a factor, Griz sniffed out the PSU fake PAT, also Portland's questionable kicking game really hurt them in the red zone (in 6 games now they've not made a fieldgoal in the red zone). Meanwhile Worst went 2-3 with one blocked. Needless to say if Will Poehls has aspirations of becoming a returner in the NFL I have some bad news for him, haha.

------------------------

Some additional thoughts:

- Coming off a rough NAU game I thought Chief Goodwin had a stellar day. Both of his interceptions were incredible, seeing the play, knowing where the ball is going to be, and going after it. He was going against a WR that was much taller than him, however he broke up several passes and played much more physical than PSU's #1. I don't know if I've ever seen one player get credited with 7 PBUs in one game. I think Chief deserves the team nomination for Big Sky defensive player of the week.

- When it's rolling our ground attack is impressive. What I've really liked to see is Joey Counts coming into his own. We all saw early on (and continually have seen it maybe save the NAU game) that Van and Canada can be a lethal 1-2 attack. Early on though, against App Counts looked like he was still coming along, then he had a big reception against UND and has been working to improve since. His vision and finding open lanes has improved and thus his stats have shown improvement. I like the balance in the running game, Canada 13 carries, Van 14 carries, Counts 10 carries with 324 yards to share on those 27 carries.

- Yesterday we saw the Clay Pierson that was playing in fall camp. If he can stay healthy we've got two very dangerous pass-catching TEs. Going back to even his high school days, Jordy really connects well with TEs in the passing game. This is a welcome addition to our offense, actually using the TE position to win in the passing game downfield. Both Pierson and Harper have been working out great this year.

- DJ Adams, who some on egriz have said are better than Bauman, was held to 79 total yards on 18 carries, a 4.4 ypc average. Add in that his longest was 17 yards, so take that one out and he had 62 yards on his other 17 carries, a 3.6 ypc average. The front seven deserve big props for that.

- Really liking it that a pair of Missoula kids were both pretty big factors in the defensive effort yesterday (and this year so far). For the criticism that Missoula high school football gets I've got to say that right now our two most talented defenders both hail from right here in Missoula, which is really cool.

------------------------
Areas of improvement:

- Pass D overall had issues. Safeties breaking down and being out of position and some of our corners looking a little lost out there. I think it was pretty rough day for Dennard as I believe he allowed two passing TDs, including the long 80 yarder late. Far too many arm tackles and losing containment on quick screen passes.

- Its already been posted and discussed on here but Jordy's accuracy, especially early, wasn't good. Not sure if he was still shaking the ghosts of last week's pass rush still. He got real lucky a few early passes weren't picked off.

- After 1 short kickoff the UM special teams almost turned the tables back to PSU when Poehls fumbled his 2nd return attempt. The coaches shouldn't have put Will in that position, why not put Nguyen or Counts up on the 25 yard line and make sure that we don't have O-linemen trying to catch kickoffs? Other teams are going to test the fact that we've got two guards standing on the 20 for kickoffs and no "hands" players there. I think they should have prepared better for that 2nd short kick.

- Glad the 1st Grizzly series on offense didn't set the tone. That 3 and out was gross, it had me worried the funk from last week was carrying over. Good to see that after that possession the Griz scored 5 consecutive TDs. I always like it when an offense can show it's dominance on the 1st series, if possible. That was a fairly unorganized and sloppy 1st series.

- I didn't really like how they had the corners practically running away from the WRs as the ball was about to be snapped. Not sure how that worked. Obviously Goodwin did his thing but PSU's WRs also dropped a lot of wide open passes where they would run up 5 to 8 yards and turn to catch a short pass. Also the running back didn't seem to really stop some deeper pass plays.

-----------------

OK so all in all this was a nice improvement from last week and it might be the first game where we saw the Griz face off and beat a team that could still do some damage in the conference. PSU is undisciplined and sloppy, that will be their downfall this year, as it always is. However is was a good measure for the Griz to show what they can do in-conference other than last week's game. The play calling and planning for this game was very good, the Griz knew what it would take to win this game on offense for sure and were really helped out by a few guys excellent performances on defense. There's a lot still needed for improvement, a defense that allows 500+ yards in a game is not going to get it done, and a QB that completes just 50% of his passes is also an issue. However it's easier to gloss that over in the face of a blowout win. The Griz need to keep working to improve and stay sharp for every game.

Griz are back to their winning ways, and now they're off to face UCD who may be a little tougher than we thought as I saw they beat upstart SUU yesterday by a few TDs.

Go Griz!
 
But I thought the motto was, "Our defense completely *****!"

I agree that passing wise, the defense needs to cut down on those 15-20 yard passes. I thought I saw the team switch to a Nickel set during the 2nd half, perhaps we should go with that more. On the plus side, our run defense was outstanding.

Van and Canada were absolute money, and its nice that the O-Line used their strength and size to their advantage, I saw some big holes being made.
 
JJ was 3-5 with 1 TD in the first quarter. 4-11 in second quarter with 1 TD (one minute into second quarter). 3-6 in 3rd with 1 TD and 2-2 in 4th with 1 TD.
 
I know there was a thread about it yesterday, but I think we don't have a short or intermediate option in the receiver routes often enough. I think that would play to JJ's strengths a bit, while also raising the completion percentage and keeping the offense on the field. I love the deep passes, but it would be nice if JJ had a bit more to choose from. It is very interesting how we are using the TEs, obviously it is working very well, they've shown they can catch, it would be nice if we used them a bit more traditionally as well. Not complaining, just making the observation that JJ is better than a 50% passer, and I think part of that is because of the limited routes available. Also, JJ running makes a huge difference for defenses and they should remind the opposing teams of that early every game, and it would be nice to see a screen pass. It was fun to watch today.
 
grzz said:
I know there was a thread about it yesterday, but I think we don't have a short or intermediate option in the receiver routes often enough. I think that would play to JJ's strengths a bit, while also raising the completion percentage and keeping the offense on the field. I love the deep passes, but it would be nice if JJ had a bit more to choose from. It is very interesting how we are using the TEs, obviously it is working very well, they've shown they can catch, it would be nice if we used them a bit more traditionally as well. Not complaining, just making the observation that JJ is better than a 50% passer, and I think part of that is because of the limited routes available. Also, JJ running makes a huge difference for defenses and they should remind the opposing teams of that early every game, and it would be nice to see a screen pass. It was fun to watch today.

Yes, JJ is better than a 50% passer. That's why he's 60% for the season--with no interceptions and no. 1 in the nation in passing efficiency.
 
PlayerRep said:
grzz said:
I know there was a thread about it yesterday, but I think we don't have a short or intermediate option in the receiver routes often enough. I think that would play to JJ's strengths a bit, while also raising the completion percentage and keeping the offense on the field. I love the deep passes, but it would be nice if JJ had a bit more to choose from. It is very interesting how we are using the TEs, obviously it is working very well, they've shown they can catch, it would be nice if we used them a bit more traditionally as well. Not complaining, just making the observation that JJ is better than a 50% passer, and I think part of that is because of the limited routes available. Also, JJ running makes a huge difference for defenses and they should remind the opposing teams of that early every game, and it would be nice to see a screen pass. It was fun to watch today.

Yes, JJ is better than a 50% passer. That's why he's 60% for the season--with no interceptions and no. 1 in the nation in passing efficiency.

Hahah. Yes, you are right. I was referring to the last two weeks. I have no complaints about JJ at all this season, I just think we could even better take advantage of his skill set the last two games.

I also think we should see what Counts or maybe even the fullback could do with the ball in short yardage. I am not advocating that Counts should regularly play ahead of Van or Canada, but it isn't uncommon to have a short yardage back. He just doesn't seem to go down at first contact and I think in some situation we could just put him in there and pound it for a first down.
 
grzz said:
PlayerRep said:
grzz said:
I know there was a thread about it yesterday, but I think we don't have a short or intermediate option in the receiver routes often enough. I think that would play to JJ's strengths a bit, while also raising the completion percentage and keeping the offense on the field. I love the deep passes, but it would be nice if JJ had a bit more to choose from. It is very interesting how we are using the TEs, obviously it is working very well, they've shown they can catch, it would be nice if we used them a bit more traditionally as well. Not complaining, just making the observation that JJ is better than a 50% passer, and I think part of that is because of the limited routes available. Also, JJ running makes a huge difference for defenses and they should remind the opposing teams of that early every game, and it would be nice to see a screen pass. It was fun to watch today.

Yes, JJ is better than a 50% passer. That's why he's 60% for the season--with no interceptions and no. 1 in the nation in passing efficiency.

Hahah. Yes, you are right. I was referring to the last two weeks. I have no complaints about JJ at all this season, I just think we could even better take advantage of his skill set the last two games.

I also think we should see what Counts or maybe even the fullback could do with the ball in short yardage. I am not advocating that Counts should regularly play ahead of Van or Canada, but it isn't uncommon to have a short yardage back. He just doesn't seem to go down at first contact and I think in some situation we could just put him in there and pound it for a first down.

And, of course, I was just teasing. JJ has been incredible so far this year. I actually thought JJ was fairly accurate yesterday, with a few exceptions. He threw the ball away multiple times. He also seemed to be essentially throwing the ball away on some longer routes (to the north and west) where the receiver was fairly well covered. I wondered why he didn't look shorter on a couple of those, as at least one was a 3rd and 5. I too wonder why Counts isn't inserted on some short yardage situations. I thought two worst defensive plays were the long pass to the open guy in the northeast corner (when we were in zone coverage and deep, but allowed the receiver to be about 8 or 10 yards to the outside of the widest defender (a corner I believe). The other was a missed tackle on the qb early in the game on a scramble to the PSU side of the field, where the defender tried to tackle high inside and just going the the legs (on against a big qb). Both are inexcusable. Getting beat on a perfect pass when you're in good position, is unfortunate but it happens, especially against a tall fast receiver.
 
Brint, you aren't nearly as popular if you don't post you game wrap-up right after the game...slipping.

I do think JJ is as good as I have seen from a Griz QB in a long time as far as getting rid of the ball and throwing it away in bad situations. I noticed it more in '11, but he is very smart about it.

Defense appears to be bend but don't break, we've had long playoff runs with that type of D before.
 
Montana will win as long as the other teams offense shoots itself in the foot. Then a Wofford or a UMass or Southern Illinois or Richmond or Villanova or JMU will come along with a low error game and the Griz will Hauck it up.
 
PlayerRep said:
grzz said:
I know there was a thread about it yesterday, but I think we don't have a short or intermediate option in the receiver routes often enough. I think that would play to JJ's strengths a bit, while also raising the completion percentage and keeping the offense on the field. I love the deep passes, but it would be nice if JJ had a bit more to choose from. It is very interesting how we are using the TEs, obviously it is working very well, they've shown they can catch, it would be nice if we used them a bit more traditionally as well. Not complaining, just making the observation that JJ is better than a 50% passer, and I think part of that is because of the limited routes available. Also, JJ running makes a huge difference for defenses and they should remind the opposing teams of that early every game, and it would be nice to see a screen pass. It was fun to watch today.

Yes, JJ is better than a 50% passer. That's why he's 60% for the season--with no interceptions and no. 1 in the nation in passing efficiency.

He is less than 50% against in conference play this year.
 
Chester Cheetah said:
PlayerRep said:
grzz said:
I know there was a thread about it yesterday, but I think we don't have a short or intermediate option in the receiver routes often enough. I think that would play to JJ's strengths a bit, while also raising the completion percentage and keeping the offense on the field. I love the deep passes, but it would be nice if JJ had a bit more to choose from. It is very interesting how we are using the TEs, obviously it is working very well, they've shown they can catch, it would be nice if we used them a bit more traditionally as well. Not complaining, just making the observation that JJ is better than a 50% passer, and I think part of that is because of the limited routes available. Also, JJ running makes a huge difference for defenses and they should remind the opposing teams of that early every game, and it would be nice to see a screen pass. It was fun to watch today.

Yes, JJ is better than a 50% passer. That's why he's 60% for the season--with no interceptions and no. 1 in the nation in passing efficiency.

He is less than 50% against in conference play this year.
Yeah, but how is he on Tuesdays in October with a full moon?
 
RobGriz said:
Chester Cheetah said:
PlayerRep said:
grzz said:
I know there was a thread about it yesterday, but I think we don't have a short or intermediate option in the receiver routes often enough. I think that would play to JJ's strengths a bit, while also raising the completion percentage and keeping the offense on the field. I love the deep passes, but it would be nice if JJ had a bit more to choose from. It is very interesting how we are using the TEs, obviously it is working very well, they've shown they can catch, it would be nice if we used them a bit more traditionally as well. Not complaining, just making the observation that JJ is better than a 50% passer, and I think part of that is because of the limited routes available. Also, JJ running makes a huge difference for defenses and they should remind the opposing teams of that early every game, and it would be nice to see a screen pass. It was fun to watch today.

Yes, JJ is better than a 50% passer. That's why he's 60% for the season--with no interceptions and no. 1 in the nation in passing efficiency.

He is less than 50% against in conference play this year.
Yeah, but how is he on Tuesdays in October with a full moon?

Hey, if Playa can cherry pick stats, so can I
 
Chester Cheetah said:
He is less than 50% against in conference play this year.
Yep rolling in right at #50 nationally :thumb:

http://www.sportsnetwork.com/merge/tsnform.aspx?c=sportsnetwork&page=cfoot2/stat/1AA-indpasseff.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

1. Jordan Johnson, Montana 5 110 66 60.00 0 1159 14 190.5
2. Vernon Adams, Eastern Wash. 5 149 97 65.10 5 1584 19 189.8
3. Conner Hempel, Harvard 3 81 55 67.90 2 803 7 174.8
4. Mason Mills, San Diego 5 157 113 71.97 2 1534 11 174.6
5. Jimmy Garoppolo, Eastern Ill. 5 231 151 65.37 4 2053 23 169.4
6. Michael Nebrich, Fordham 6 211 155 73.46 1 1761 16 167.6
7. Cody Stroud, McNeese St. 6 163 104 63.80 2 1444 14 164.1
8. Trent Hurley, Delaware 6 151 101 66.89 6 1297 14 161.7
9. Keiran McDonagh, Portland St. 6 155 86 55.48 7 1597 13 160.7
10. Dray Joseph, Southern U. 5 169 114 67.46 2 1469 11 159.6
11. Jeff Mathews, Cornell 3 110 73 66.36 4 972 8 157.3
12. Andy Summerlin, Samford 6 201 124 61.69 4 1754 14 154.0
13. Nick SanGiacomo, Central Conn. St. 5 82 50 60.98 2 637 8 153.5
14. Jacob Huesman, Chattanooga 5 107 68 63.55 3 767 11 152.1
15. Alex Ross, Coastal Caro. 5 136 91 66.91 4 1120 9 152.0
16. Henry Furman, Yale 3 86 59 68.60 1 681 5 152.0
17. Dylan Favre, UT Martin 5 105 73 69.52 4 792 8 150.4
18. Marcus Wasilewski, Maine 6 189 127 67.20 6 1534 12 150.0
19. Brandon Bialkowski, Lehigh 5 223 143 64.13 6 1854 14 149.3
20. John Gibbs Jr., Alcorn 6 144 92 63.89 3 1133 10 148.7
21. Peter Athens, Towson 6 154 98 63.64 4 1332 8 148.2
22. Kurt Hess, Youngstown St. 6 150 90 60.00 2 1190 11 148.2
23. Sawyer Kollmorgen, UNI 5 129 79 61.24 1 1003 9 148.0
24. Matt Johnson, Charlotte 6 206 132 64.08 7 1582 16 147.4
25. Dillon Buechel, Duquesne 4 129 81 62.79 4 1159 6 147.4
26. Blake Winkler, Illinois St. 4 94 61 64.89 1 747 5 147.1
27. Lyle Negron, Stony Brook 5 138 88 63.77 3 1143 7 145.7
28. Kory Faulkner, Southern Ill. 6 198 119 60.10 3 1475 15 144.6
29. Gavin McCarney, Colgate 4 95 63 66.32 1 733 4 142.9
30. John Robertson, Villanova 5 114 77 67.54 3 892 5 142.5
31. Jake Bleskin, Montana St. 5 94 60 63.83 4 733 6 141.9
32. Caleb Berry, Lamar 5 171 105 61.40 4 1214 13 141.4
33. Josh Woodrum, Liberty 6 146 88 60.27 4 1177 8 140.6
34. Brock Jensen, North Dakota St. 5 117 76 64.96 3 770 9 140.5
35. Steven Hughes, Jacksonville 5 133 72 54.14 3 1161 7 140.3
36. Malcom Dixon, Charleston So. 5 75 40 53.33 2 585 6 139.9
37. Troy Mitchell, Western Caro. 5 127 74 57.27 5 1030 8 139.3
38. Garrett Safron, Sacramento St. 6 219 138 63.01 7 1476 16 137.3
39. Michael Birdsong, James Madison 6 174 106 60.92 7 1312 11 137.1
40. Maikhail Miller, Murray St. 6 186 124 66.67 5 1206 12 137.0
41. Eric Hoffman, Valparaiso 5 191 115 60.21 4 1371 11 135.3
42. Mike Perish, Indiana St. 5 199 118 59.30 6 1433 13 135.3
43. Lucas Beatty, Gardner-Webb 6 183 121 66.12 5 1305 8 135.0
44. Jerry Lovelocke, Prairie View 6 231 157 67.97 3 1510 10 134.6
45. Michael Strauss, Richmond 5 203 131 64.53 4 1413 9 133.7
46. Joe Mollberg, North Dakota 5 108 66 61.11 6 871 5 133.0
47. RJ Noel, Sacred Heart 6 148 83 56.08 2 1005 10 132.7
48. John Russ, Mercer 5 109 53 48.62 3 807 9 132.6
49. Daniel Duhart, Alabama St. 6 151 89 58.94 2 1010 9 132.1
50. Denarius McGhee, Montana St. 5 90 56 62.22 1 724 1 131.2
 
Just watched MD and JJ on the Grizzly Sports Report.

Mick said Gregorak was not happy with tackling after the game, said they preached all week about not getting into confrontations and reacting to PSU's "style of play", said PSU's philosophy is more wide open and encourages rough play, said they are the complete opposite and depend on execution and penalty-free ball. Praised Goodwin for his battle on every down attitude.

JJ basically said the offensive line felt bad about their performance at NAU and had a much better game this week, said he sees the secondary improving every week in practice, said getting Pierson back is going to be a big plus, said winning is all that matters over stats "I know that's what everyone says but it's true", said they need to show they can be a force on the road this week.

Nothing earth shattering but thought I'd pass it on for those who missed it.
 
UM needs to utilize the TEs and short passing game as well as Run, Run, Run Long bomb.

If our defense is going to be like this fine but open the can of whop ass on the offense.

need to see scores of 70 plus like the mid 90s then mediocre defense will still allow us into the NC and Winners circle.
 
Tokyogriz said:
UM needs to utilize the TEs and short passing game as well as Run, Run, Run Long bomb.

If our defense is going to be like this fine but open the can of whop ass on the offense.

need to see scores of 70 plus like the mid 90s then mediocre defense will still allow us into the NC and Winners circle.

We've scored 55, 55, 47 and 30. Something tells me the offense is going to be just fine.
 
AZGrizFan said:
Tokyogriz said:
UM needs to utilize the TEs and short passing game as well as Run, Run, Run Long bomb.

If our defense is going to be like this fine but open the can of whop ass on the offense.

need to see scores of 70 plus like the mid 90s then mediocre defense will still allow us into the NC and Winners circle.

We've scored 55, 55, 47 and 30. Something tells me the offense is going to be just fine.

No kidding. Not to mention the D is still allowing just under 20 points per game, which is identical to 2011.
 
And, we beat App St by 24, and it's other 3 losses are all by 3 points, including one in OT. While App St is struggling, and being impacted by it's in-between situation, they are not a bad team.

PSU has a powerful offense and weak defense. Within 7 points of Cal, beat Davis by 31, lost to CP by a few points.

UND came within 7 of SDSU, and then was clobbered by both UM and MSU.

UM had a bad game against NAU. That can't happen again.

The Cats haven't beaten anyone good, unless NAU is good. But NAU has only beaten UM (when UM was caught napping, and NAU played out of its heads), unless beating Davis by 11 and SD by 6 are deemed to be big wins.

EWU has a nice win over Oregon St, but it's only other wins are Western Oregon and Weber.

So Utah may be okay, but it's wins are So Ala, Fort Lewis, Sac St by 3 in OT, and No Colo by 6.

Sac St is 3-3, with win over So Ore, Weber, and No Colo.

CP has beaten only San Diego and PSU (by 4).

UM has the best record in the conference, at 4-1. It remains to be seen how good UM is, but other than EWU and MSU, no one else seems particularly strong to me. That doesn't mean that every team on the schedule, other than Weber, are not capable of beating us.
 
PlayerRep said:
And, we beat App St by 24, and it's other 3 losses are all by 3 points, including one in OT. While App St is struggling, and being impacted by it's in-between situation, they are not a bad team.

PSU has a powerful offense and weak defense. Within 7 points of Cal, beat Davis by 31, lost to CP by a few points.

UND came within 7 of NDSU, and then was clobbered by both UM and MSU.

UM had a bad game against NAU. That can't happen again.

The Cats haven't beaten anyone good, unless NAU is good. But NAU has only beaten UM (when UM was caught napping, and NAU played out of its heads), unless beating Davis by 11 and SD by 6 are deemed to be big wins.

EWU has a nice win over Oregon St, but it's only other wins are Western Oregon and Weber.

So Utah may be okay, but it's wins are So Ala, Fort Lewis, Sac St by 3 in OT, and No Colo by 6.

Sac St is 3-3, with win over So Ore, Weber, and No Colo.

CP has beaten only San Diego and PSU (by 4).

UM has the best record in the conference, at 4-1. It remains to be seen how good UM is, but other than EWU and MSU, no one else seems particularly strong to me. That doesn't mean that every team on the schedule, other than Weber, are not capable of beating us.

Good post. Not to be nitpicky, but UND was within 7 points of SDSU not NDSU.
 
AZGrizFan said:
PlayerRep said:
And, we beat App St by 24, and it's other 3 losses are all by 3 points, including one in OT. While App St is struggling, and being impacted by it's in-between situation, they are not a bad team.

PSU has a powerful offense and weak defense. Within 7 points of Cal, beat Davis by 31, lost to CP by a few points.

UND came within 7 of NDSU, and then was clobbered by both UM and MSU.

UM had a bad game against NAU. That can't happen again.

The Cats haven't beaten anyone good, unless NAU is good. But NAU has only beaten UM (when UM was caught napping, and NAU played out of its heads), unless beating Davis by 11 and SD by 6 are deemed to be big wins.

EWU has a nice win over Oregon St, but it's only other wins are Western Oregon and Weber.

So Utah may be okay, but it's wins are So Ala, Fort Lewis, Sac St by 3 in OT, and No Colo by 6.

Sac St is 3-3, with win over So Ore, Weber, and No Colo.

CP has beaten only San Diego and PSU (by 4).

UM has the best record in the conference, at 4-1. It remains to be seen how good UM is, but other than EWU and MSU, no one else seems particularly strong to me. That doesn't mean that every team on the schedule, other than Weber, are not capable of beating us.

Good post. Not to be nitpicky, but UND was within 7 points of SDSU not NDSU.

Oops, typo. Fixed it. Thx.
 
Back
Top