-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
Post Game: A season fumbled away
- Thread starter BWahlberg
- Start date
IdahoGrizFan
Well-known member
Are there highlights out there somewhere that I am missing?
Show me the way, didn't see the game. Just listen on the Radio after half.
Show me the way, didn't see the game. Just listen on the Radio after half.
Htowngriz said:BWahlberg said:
Maybe. I did my best to drink away all memory of the game.
It was halfway through the 3d quarter. On the play after the Cat d-back took off his helmet on the field and threw it down, and refs failed to penalize him. With penalty, UM drive would have continued, from the 11 or so, and UM probably would have scored. Thanks refs.
WaGriz4life
Well-known member
william said:
Agreed, don’t think he is a D1 athlete. Honest opinion, no disrespect. Bobby needs
To get Turner and Janacaro ready for next year
So, a kid recruited to San Diego St, who redshirts, transfers to UM, and then starts most of the games for UM, is not a D-I athlete?
Huh, interesting.
Do you think that running backs at UM that didn't play, and didn't start, are not D-I athletics? Or why are they D-I athletes and Eastwood isn't?
Or, is 4.1 per carry, behind a not great o-line, and 1 fumble, just a strong indication that he is not a D-I athlete and never will be? Just curious.
Do you think it's possible that a redshirt frosh would improve year to year, or are they, or Eastwood, just stuck where he is?
Huh, interesting.
Do you think that running backs at UM that didn't play, and didn't start, are not D-I athletics? Or why are they D-I athletes and Eastwood isn't?
Or, is 4.1 per carry, behind a not great o-line, and 1 fumble, just a strong indication that he is not a D-I athlete and never will be? Just curious.
Do you think it's possible that a redshirt frosh would improve year to year, or are they, or Eastwood, just stuck where he is?
The.Real.2506
Well-known member
PlayerRep said:
Refs must have felt that the helmet wasn't intentionally removed by the player. They have a better view of it than you do.
The.Real.2506
Well-known member
grizband said:
I will stipulate that some refs cant see shit, even if they have a better view :thumb:
The.Real.2506 said:
Huh? The player put both hands on the sides of his helmet and lifted it off of his head. Think his chinstrap was affixed. So he had to have exerted some force for the helmet to go off. It didn't come off during the play. He was running up field, and at least 10 yards away from the play when helmet came. If you had played more football, you would know that helmets don't just jump off heads when players are running.
....three fumbles away from being 9-2.....
Interesting if you look over Brints talking points (so far, knock on wood) this staff and team has been adressing them.
Three plays away from a bye and hosting a playoff game.
As painful as it was when it was unfolding, maybe last year's team was closer than we thought.
That's a great sign for this year's team. Gotta admit, I'm still a little gun shy but maybe a few egrizzers pounding their chests are on to something.
Interesting if you look over Brints talking points (so far, knock on wood) this staff and team has been adressing them.
Three plays away from a bye and hosting a playoff game.
As painful as it was when it was unfolding, maybe last year's team was closer than we thought.
That's a great sign for this year's team. Gotta admit, I'm still a little gun shy but maybe a few egrizzers pounding their chests are on to something.
argh! said:
Exactly. (not all caps)
The.Real.2506
Well-known member
Thanks for reposting this thread, it was fun to read :thumb:
