• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Poll: Winner winner, chicken dinner.

What team will win the conference and host the tournament?

  • Montana

    Votes: 29 53.7%
  • EWU

    Votes: 15 27.8%
  • Sac State

    Votes: 8 14.8%
  • NAU

    Votes: 2 3.7%

  • Total voters
    54
  • Poll closed .
EverettGriz said:
WTF?!?! Adding Idaho was the only intelligent thing the bsc has done in the last 25 years. That evened up the numbers for BB and gave everyone a travel partner. Oh, and Idaho happens to have DI level facilities.
So that court with all the colored lines that was broadcast to BSCTV using a toaster was a D1 facility? And you're bitching about the Well? :?
 
SDHornet said:
EverettGriz said:
WTF?!?! Adding Idaho was the only intelligent thing the bsc has done in the last 25 years. That evened up the numbers for BB and gave everyone a travel partner. Oh, and Idaho happens to have DI level facilities.
So that court with all the colored lines that was broadcast to BSCTV using a toaster was a D1 facility? And you're bitching about the Well? :?

EG is right, adding Idaho was a good thing. Brought back some great bball rivalries and gave everyone a travel partner...Plus they are a pretty good program with good facilities...Also a pretty good academic university...
 
marceagfan5 said:
SDHornet said:
EverettGriz said:
WTF?!?! Adding Idaho was the only intelligent thing the bsc has done in the last 25 years. That evened up the numbers for BB and gave everyone a travel partner. Oh, and Idaho happens to have DI level facilities.
So that court with all the colored lines that was broadcast to BSCTV using a toaster was a D1 facility? And you're bitching about the Well? :?

EG is right, adding Idaho was a good thing. Brought back some great bball rivalries and gave everyone a travel partner...Plus they are a pretty good program with good facilities...Also a pretty good academic university...
I like the add since it made for good travel partners for almost all the BSC. But since there is an uproar about the BSC "image", where is the uproar about the subpar streaming quality? Without a doubt EWU, UI, UM, and MSU are at the bottom of the BSC in terms of online quality. HD* technology not reach that area of the country yet?

*HD stands for High Definition for those not in the know.
 
SDHornet said:
marceagfan5 said:
SDHornet said:
EverettGriz said:
WTF?!?! Adding Idaho was the only intelligent thing the bsc has done in the last 25 years. That evened up the numbers for BB and gave everyone a travel partner. Oh, and Idaho happens to have DI level facilities.
So that court with all the colored lines that was broadcast to BSCTV using a toaster was a D1 facility? And you're bitching about the Well? :?

EG is right, adding Idaho was a good thing. Brought back some great bball rivalries and gave everyone a travel partner...Plus they are a pretty good program with good facilities...Also a pretty good academic university...
I like the add since it made for good travel partners for almost all the BSC. But since there is an uproar about the BSC "image", where is the uproar about the subpar streaming quality? Without a doubt EWU, UI, UM, and MSU are at the bottom of the BSC in terms of online quality. HD* technology not reach that area of the country yet?

*HD stands for High Definition for those not in the know.
A) you need to stop talking smack about Idaho. They might be Spuds, but they are our Spuds and you haven't earned the right to talk smack about them
B) nobody believes you have watched a game on-line broadcast from Missoula or Bozeman since Sac State didn't play at Montana this year and you only started following Hornet basketball this February.
 
Grizbeer said:
SDHornet said:
marceagfan5 said:
SDHornet said:
So that court with all the colored lines that was broadcast to BSCTV using a toaster was a D1 facility? And you're bitching about the Well? :?

EG is right, adding Idaho was a good thing. Brought back some great bball rivalries and gave everyone a travel partner...Plus they are a pretty good program with good facilities...Also a pretty good academic university...
I like the add since it made for good travel partners for almost all the BSC. But since there is an uproar about the BSC "image", where is the uproar about the subpar streaming quality? Without a doubt EWU, UI, UM, and MSU are at the bottom of the BSC in terms of online quality. HD* technology not reach that area of the country yet?

*HD stands for High Definition for those not in the know.
A) you need to stop talking smack about Idaho. They might be Spuds, but they are our Spuds and you haven't earned the right to talk smack about them
B) nobody believes you have watched a game on-line broadcast from Missoula or Bozeman since Sac State didn't play at Montana this year and you only started following Hornet basketball this February.


:lol: :lol:
 
Grizbeer said:
A) you need to stop talking smack about Idaho. They might be Spuds, but they are our Spuds and you haven't earned the right to talk smack about them
B) nobody believes you have watched a game on-line broadcast from Missoula or Bozeman since Sac State didn't play at Montana this year and you only started following Hornet basketball this February.
A) So you are going to pick and chose which BSC members to berate? Got it. BTW there was a reason UI wasn’t even a consideration for MWC expansion after WAC FB folded, anyone who tuned into that UM-UI webcast can understand why.

B) Swing and a miss. Hornet fan ever since I was a freshman almost 15 years ago. Nice try though.
 
SDHornet said:
EverettGriz said:
WTF?!?! Adding Idaho was the only intelligent thing the bsc has done in the last 25 years. That evened up the numbers for BB and gave everyone a travel partner. Oh, and Idaho happens to have DI level facilities.
So that court with all the colored lines that was broadcast to BSCTV using a toaster was a D1 facility? And you're bitching about the Well? :?
Well, it beat the fake gym that SACTO is relying upon and most certainly is better than the what passes for a Home Court in Sac.
 
SDHornet said:
Grizbeer said:
A) you need to stop talking smack about Idaho. They might be Spuds, but they are our Spuds and you haven't earned the right to talk smack about them
B) nobody believes you have watched a game on-line broadcast from Missoula or Bozeman since Sac State didn't play at Montana this year and you only started following Hornet basketball this February.
A) So you are going to pick and chose which BSC members to berate? Got it. BTW there was a reason UI wasn’t even a consideration for MWC expansion after WAC FB folded, anyone who tuned into that UM-UI webcast can understand why.

B) Swing and a miss. Hornet fan ever since I was a freshman almost 15 years ago. Nice try though.
A) as shitty as UI's court and broadcast was, still magnitudes better than Sac Stat.
B) so you have been on E-Griz since 2009 but your first post in the basketball forum was on February 4, 2015, and you are a hardcore longtime Sac State basketball fan? Sounds about right.
 
Grizbeer said:
SDHornet said:
Grizbeer said:
A) you need to stop talking smack about Idaho. They might be Spuds, but they are our Spuds and you haven't earned the right to talk smack about them
B) nobody believes you have watched a game on-line broadcast from Missoula or Bozeman since Sac State didn't play at Montana this year and you only started following Hornet basketball this February.
A) So you are going to pick and chose which BSC members to berate? Got it. BTW there was a reason UI wasn’t even a consideration for MWC expansion after WAC FB folded, anyone who tuned into that UM-UI webcast can understand why.

B) Swing and a miss. Hornet fan ever since I was a freshman almost 15 years ago. Nice try though.
A) as shitty as UI's court and broadcast was, still magnitudes better than Sac Stat.
B) so you have been on E-Griz since 2009 but your first post in the basketball forum was on February 4, 2015, and you are a hardcore longtime Sac State basketball fan? Sounds about right.


Napoli-JetBlue-smash.gif
 
Grizbeer said:
SDHornet said:
Grizbeer said:
A) you need to stop talking smack about Idaho. They might be Spuds, but they are our Spuds and you haven't earned the right to talk smack about them
B) nobody believes you have watched a game on-line broadcast from Missoula or Bozeman since Sac State didn't play at Montana this year and you only started following Hornet basketball this February.
A) So you are going to pick and chose which BSC members to berate? Got it. BTW there was a reason UI wasn’t even a consideration for MWC expansion after WAC FB folded, anyone who tuned into that UM-UI webcast can understand why.

B) Swing and a miss. Hornet fan ever since I was a freshman almost 15 years ago. Nice try though.
A) as shitty as UI's court and broadcast was, still magnitudes better than Sac Stat.
B) so you have been on E-Griz since 2009 but your first post in the basketball forum was on February 4, 2015, and you are a hardcore longtime Sac State basketball fan? Sounds about right.
A)You’ve clearly never seen a Sac webcast this season. It’s leap and bounds better than UI’s….and UM’s.
B)I didn’t know my fandom is based on posting on eGriz since it’s not our message board. Check Sac Buzz or the BSC threads on CS and get back to me.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
SDHornet said:
Grizbeer said:
SDHornet said:
A) So you are going to pick and chose which BSC members to berate? Got it. BTW there was a reason UI wasn’t even a consideration for MWC expansion after WAC FB folded, anyone who tuned into that UM-UI webcast can understand why.

B) Swing and a miss. Hornet fan ever since I was a freshman almost 15 years ago. Nice try though.
Check Sac Buzz

No, no, no, no, and no. Fans of other BSC teams come to eGriz for validation, not the other way around.

Sort of like FCS teams having to go to BCS teams to play them. :thumb:
 
SDHornet said:
Grizbeer said:
SDHornet said:
Grizbeer said:
A) you need to stop talking smack about Idaho. They might be Spuds, but they are our Spuds and you haven't earned the right to talk smack about them
B) nobody believes you have watched a game on-line broadcast from Missoula or Bozeman since Sac State didn't play at Montana this year and you only started following Hornet basketball this February.
A) So you are going to pick and chose which BSC members to berate? Got it. BTW there was a reason UI wasn’t even a consideration for MWC expansion after WAC FB folded, anyone who tuned into that UM-UI webcast can understand why.

B) Swing and a miss. Hornet fan ever since I was a freshman almost 15 years ago. Nice try though.
A) as shitty as UI's court and broadcast was, still magnitudes better than Sac Stat.
B) so you have been on E-Griz since 2009 but your first post in the basketball forum was on February 4, 2015, and you are a hardcore longtime Sac State basketball fan? Sounds about right.
A)You’ve clearly never seen a Sac webcast this season. It’s leap and bounds better than UI’s….and UM’s.
B)I didn’t know my fandom is based on posting on eGriz since it’s not our message board. Check Sac Buzz or the BSC threads on CS and get back to me.
Hmm interesting - how many people are on the Sac boards that are not also on egriz?
 
Back
Top