get'em_griz said:bison said:I really respect Montana but you guys need to take a step back and ask yourself who the hell have you played that is any decent this year? Don't even begin to try to tell me App State because they are not a playoff caliber football team even if they could be in the playoffs.
The same could be said about North Dakota State. The only decent opponent NDSU has played was against Kansas State, and that was a great win. NDSU is insanely good, and will be the team to beat this year. Let's look at the games played by NDSU and Montana so far.
North Dakota State Games
@ FBS Kansas State - W 24-21
vs DII Ferris State - W 56-10
vs Delaware State - W 51-0
Montana Games
vs Appalachian State - W 30-6
@ North Dakota - W 55-17
vs DII OK Panhandle State - W 47-14 (1st String out before 1st quarter ends)
Really, the only quality game NDSU has played has been Kansas State. The other two games NDSU played, they dominated just like really good teams are supposed to do. Other than the Kansas State game, both Montana and NDSU have played two weaker opponents (UND might even beat Delaware State). Montana hasn't played quality teams as of yet (and I argue that App State is better than people give them credit for), but like good teams do, we've dominated our opponents. Two at home and one on the road. I guess what I'm trying to get at is there are a lot of people who say that we really aren't as good as we think we are because we've played inferior opponents, but when you look at the way we've won our games, we have a damn good team and will be extremely tough to beat by a majority of teams.
bison said:hm.grwn.grizfan said:bison said:I really respect Montana but you guys need to take a step back and ask yourself who the hell have you played that is any decent this year? Don't even begin to try to tell me App State because they are not a playoff caliber football team even if they could be in the playoffs.
Dude, you have 5 total posts on this board, and at least 2 that I know of have been trash talk. Really? You're off to a great start here :?
Not trying to trash talk, just calling it how I see it. The Grizz havent played a quality team yet this year.
I come on here to read the trash talking of MSUGood stuff!
BWahlberg said:Looks to me like the Griz will probably hop up to 7th. I can't imagine SDSU getting smacked for losing to Nebraska. As for the Cats, probably somewhere in the 10-15 range.
Except for the really bad vibes out of Lincoln, I'd agree with you on SDSU. But a consensus seems to have grown that Nebraska just isn't that good. So their beat-down of SDSU may hurt more than we would otherwise think.BWahlberg said:Looks to me like the Griz will probably hop up to 7th. I can't imagine SDSU getting smacked for losing to Nebraska. As for the Cats, probably somewhere in the 10-15 range.
grizhunter said:With all the injuries we have had this year, I don't believe the Cats should be in the top 25 the way they are playing. Now they could turn it around but I think it is doubtful, hopefully I am wrong. The O line has been getting owned, our def line has much to be desired. Bleskin is doing well considering, when Dmac comes back it will take a while to start slinging the rock around as good as usual and should be nervous to get smacked on the runs he does. It is amazing what he has done for this team, but it is an eye opener at how good he made things look. I doubt the Cats make the playoffs this year. I am not pouting or shit like that, just being real.
IdaGriz01 said:With four teams in the top-10 losing, there is bound to be some fairly significant shuffling at the head of the list. MSU was “in” their game until near the end, but some pollsters will see only the final score. I have them dropping 4 slots (a fairly typical amount after a loss). But they could get hurt worse, since SF Austin was unranked and not even among the “Others receiving votes” in the last poll.
Of course, two of those top-10 losses were to FBS opponents, so the losers should drop less than usual. But after a slow start by Nebraska, SDSU got beat up pretty bad (and Nebraska may not be that good this year). Conversely, Eastern Illinois hung in there against a pretty good Northern team and only lost by 4 points -- so my guess has them only sliding one slot.
The lower tier in the poll only had the two losses, with one to a strong FBS opponent. But Beth-Cook lost by a lot, so I figure them to drop a typical four slots. I believe the other loss (an “upset”) will hurt Stony Brook (down 6) more than it helps Villanova (up 3). It’ll be interesting to see how that turns out.
Rank, Team (Record), [Old Rank]
1. North Dakota State (3-0) [1]
2. Eastern Washington (2-1) [2]
3. Towson (4-0) [4]
4. Sam Houston State (3-1) [5]
5. Northern Iowa (3-0) [7]
6. Montana (3-0) [9]
7. Montana State (2-2) [3]
8. New Hampshire (1-1) [11]
9. Eastern Illinois (3-1) [8]
10. South Dakota State (3-1) [6]
11. McNeese State (4-0) [12]
12. Coastal Carolina (4-0) [15]
13. Central Arkansas(2-2) [13]
14. Wofford (2-2) [10]
15. Georgia Southern (2-1) [14]
16. James Madison (3-1) [17]
17. Villanova (1-2) [20]
18. Cal Poly (1-2) [18]
19. Fordham (4-0) [21]
20. Richmond (2-2) [23]
21. Lehigh (3-0) [22]
22. Stony Brook (1-2) [16]
23. Bethune-Cookman (3-1) [19]
24. Tennessee-Martin (2-1) [24]
25. Northern Arizona (2-1) [25]
My guess for the Griz may be a bit optimistic, but I like it anyway.![]()
Nope. They did not receive any votes in the poll for the previous week, so they are obviously not on anybody's radar. And, since the lower end of the ranking was pretty clean, there's no place to put them.AllWeatherFan said:No love for Portland State?
It sure is. I'm glad the Griz had a credible opponent on the road already. No matter what people say, now, everyone expected a tough "away" game at UND. For whatever reason (they're bad, the Griz are good, somewhere in between), that turned out to be a relatively easy win ... but the Griz went into it ready to play tough. That has to help now.brootgrizr said:Both Appy & UND were considered reasonably strong teams BEFORE they played the Griz. Perhaps those two teams were overrated, or maybe the Griz were underrated. It is too early in the season to be sure. But, I'll bet the Cats (perhaps overrated) aren't taking UND for granted! Then there is Flagstaff. ... The real season is about to begin!
Which, I think, captures the entire poll thing, this early in the season, in a nutshell. But isn't it fun to discuss/bitch about? Still, as my guess shows, I think the kitties will likely be in the top ten ... just because the pollsters hate to admit they were so wrong. (But I'd love to be wrong.IntuitiveGriz said:The m cats held the lead 1 time in the whole game against a totally un-ranked team. And that fleeting lead was for a whopping whole two minutes and seconds, and not until the 4th qtr after SFA shot themselves in the foot. The m cats were down by two scores a lot against this non-feared team.
Any team in the top 10, that is 2-2 with wins only over monmouth and colorado mesa is a total flippin' joke.
It's called "hubris" -- to think that what we say here on a fan board makes any damn different. But so be it. Perhaps enough voters will look in here and get a notion of the shakiness of the MSU record ... and ding them for it. (But I'm not hopeful.)G-BEARS said:In my opinion the cats have to drop to around 13. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think any team in the top 12 of last weeks poll has lost to an fcs opponent. It would be pretty weird if MSU was in front of some schools that that didn't have a loss to a team at our level. That being said it will probably happen.
bison said:I really respect Montana but you guys need to take a step back and ask yourself who the hell have you played that is any decent this year? Don't even begin to try to tell me App State because they are not a playoff caliber football team even if they could be in the playoffs.