no, not for our season. i've pretty much written that off. we'll be lucky to finish .500. the descent this year has been a stunner. there's simply no hope for kemp, weisner and hutchison, no future here to prepare for. showcase jamar as one of the great ones ever at montana, and play lopez, gfeller, dunn and martin. when your hopes for next year are pinned on one guy--a guy who scored ONE point all year at washinghton and might transfer out anyway--your program is in deep trouble. time to start over.
no, the pivotal aspect involves the "inner contest" between bill evans and wayne tinkle. two years ago, montana was one of two premier programs in the conference, arguably the holder of the penthouse, while idaho state was an unkempt bum of a program, snoring in a doorway. idaho state is not the penthouse, and we're not snoring in the doorway, but the elevators are going in opposite directions. you can't help but wonder what evans's presence meant to the montana program. i saw much of the idaho state-usf game on tv earlier this year, and was amazed at the talent, poise and defensive intensity evans has built into that program in his second year. i'm just hoping the difference doesn't become painfully obvious tonight.
no, the pivotal aspect involves the "inner contest" between bill evans and wayne tinkle. two years ago, montana was one of two premier programs in the conference, arguably the holder of the penthouse, while idaho state was an unkempt bum of a program, snoring in a doorway. idaho state is not the penthouse, and we're not snoring in the doorway, but the elevators are going in opposite directions. you can't help but wonder what evans's presence meant to the montana program. i saw much of the idaho state-usf game on tv earlier this year, and was amazed at the talent, poise and defensive intensity evans has built into that program in his second year. i'm just hoping the difference doesn't become painfully obvious tonight.