• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Petek Arrested for Domestic Violence

alabamagrizzly said:
3-7-77 said:
I can't help what YOU can't understand...
Maybe you could look back at your ACT/SAT English comprehension score. Just a suggestion.

"“The education of a man is never completed until he dies.” -Robert E. Lee

I don’t think the reading comprehension was a problem. It was trying to comprehend what your intent to the post was. I was a little confused also why in most your posts, you’ve been defending the defense of Petek but then in this last post, it seems you’d be expecting for Peter to respond violently to Fahque. So are you defending his violent responses then? Please clarify.

In many cases when the educated can’t understand the educator, it’s the message delivery(from you) that is at fault.

“The critical factor is not class size but rather the nature of the teaching as it affects learning.” -C.B Neblette

Anyone posting quotes from REL is lame...among the top 5 of all-time traitors. Violated his oath to the Constitution, then lost the war. Loser. Period.
 
Bama, my clarification: All the facts are not public. There are at least two sides to every story. Its like having 30 witnesses to something, and you get 30 different stories. This Miners Court/Kangaroo Court has only heard the accusations, but are ready to hang Petek. Thats pathetic. Like any lynch mob, they come with hoods over their heads to hide their identity. In todays world, its eGriz. I got my 'hood' on like everyone else. Petek's past has nothing to do with the current ACCUSATION, unless allowed in court. IF he's found guilty, THEN his past is taken into consideration at sentencing. Let the legal process play out, THEN express your views. I tried to cover all these points in prior posts on this subject, but hells bells, we are on page nine. I don't read every post on any subject, so I can't say you or others are lax. I am too. If you found my last post vague, go back and read my prior posts in this thread. That should clear it up. I will be more careful to fully express myself in the future, hopefully in one post.
 
Fahque said:
3-7-77 said:
Well, Zirg, you, and for that matter all the other self-righteous posters on this site as well, should say that to his face. A recent picture was posted on google so you know what he looks like. Wouldn't want you to man-up to the wrong guy. Mano a Mano. He shouldn't be too hard to find. Helena ain't LA. Let us know how it turns out.

And what would happen if he did? Would Petek be a "tough guy" because he is incapable of using his words? I don't understand posts like this, are you just wanting to see the real Petek lose his temper and beat the shi7 out of yet another person, hence validating the perception he has earned for himself?

I took it to mean that 77 would like to see if Zirg had the balls to say that stuff to Peter's face, not what Petek would do to him. My guess is that Petek would laugh at him.

Here's 77's post. See what I highlighted.

"Well, Zirg, you, and for that matter all the other self-righteous posters on this site as well, should say that to his face. A recent picture was posted on google so you know what he looks like. Wouldn't want you to man-up to the wrong guy. Mano a Mano. He shouldn't be too hard to find. Helena ain't LA. Let us know how it turns out."
 
mthoopsfan said:
I took it to mean that 77 would like to see if Zirg had the balls to say that stuff to Peter's face, not what Petek would do to him.

Bingo!
I don't know Mr. Petek or Fahque. How many 'terror of the keyboard' types are there on eGriz?
 
3-7-77 said:
mthoopsfan said:
I took it to mean that 77 would like to see if Zirg had the balls to say that stuff to Peter's face, not what Petek would do to him.

Bingo!
I don't know Mr. Petek or Fahque. How many 'terror of the keyboard' types are there on eGriz?

Here's what I will say to AP's face:

- Dude, sucks your an ex-con. But, dealing dope in Montana is dumb, and not a good look for a former #37. You tarnished the tradition. Hope you stay out of jail for the recent allegations of pulling a girl's hair from here scalp among other things. Maybe some day - you'll get your shit together.

DM me - I'll send my location in Poland, and AP can come see me. He should bring some friends.
 
That's all I ask. If anyone on eGriz knows how to get in touch with Mr. Petek, maybe you can facilitate the meeting with SoldierGriz. I doubt you used your own dime to get to Poland, so maybe you two could meet half-way, like in East Helena. Again, let us know how it turns out.
 
mthoopsfan said:
Fahque said:
And what would happen if he did? Would Petek be a "tough guy" because he is incapable of using his words? I don't understand posts like this, are you just wanting to see the real Petek lose his temper and beat the shi7 out of yet another person, hence validating the perception he has earned for himself?

I took it to mean that 77 would like to see if Zirg had the balls to say that stuff to Peter's face, not what Petek would do to him. My guess is that Petek would laugh at him.

Here's 77's post. See what I highlighted.

"Well, Zirg, you, and for that matter all the other self-righteous posters on this site as well, should say that to his face. A recent picture was posted on google so you know what he looks like. Wouldn't want you to man-up to the wrong guy. Mano a Mano. He shouldn't be too hard to find. Helena ain't LA. Let us know how it turns out."

Yeah, I mean if we only posted here what we'd actually say to someone's face, this would be a lot less titillating site. lol And yeah, I would never pop-off to Petek to his face cause I know he's crazy.
 
This is another that I’ve tried to refrain from posting on, but two things can be thought in a reconcilable way at once:

1. Due process is a very important part of the legal process (especially in criminal proceedings); and

2. Anyone who actually does the things alleged in that affidavit without a provable defense is a scumbag and a criminal.

Both are true. Thanks for reading.
 
Back
Top