• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

People Would Bitch...

HelenaHandBasket said:
cclarkblues said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
Defense did what they needed to, but I still think NAU puts up 35 if Cookus doesn't get bounced.

And I think we would have put up 45 with either Reese or Jensen.

How does that come into play when talking about the Griz defensive performance?

We still win.
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
uofmman1122 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
Defense did what they needed to, but I still think NAU puts up 35 if Cookus doesn't get bounced.
And we could put up 45 if Gresch was playing.

See how easy this is?

NAU should be 100% favored with their 2nd string QB over our 4th string QB.

This was a great, gutsy win.

What Gresch would do has nothing to do with the Griz defense. So are you saying the Griz D holds NAU to 15 with Cookus?

you are one seriously clueless clown.
 
pussycatkillerz said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
Defense did what they needed to, but I still think NAU puts up 35 if Cookus doesn't get bounced.

Griz put up 38 if Jenson plays

Maybe, but has nothing to do with how the Griz D played against a backup freshman QB that got zero reps during the week.
 
cclarkblues said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
cclarkblues said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
Defense did what they needed to, but I still think NAU puts up 35 if Cookus doesn't get bounced.

And I think we would have put up 45 with either Reese or Jensen.

How does that come into play when talking about the Griz defensive performance?

We still win.

Where did I say anything about winning or losing?
 
argh! said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
uofmman1122 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
Defense did what they needed to, but I still think NAU puts up 35 if Cookus doesn't get bounced.
And we could put up 45 if Gresch was playing.

See how easy this is?

NAU should be 100% favored with their 2nd string QB over our 4th string QB.

This was a great, gutsy win.

What Gresch would do has nothing to do with the Griz defense. So are you saying the Griz D holds NAU to 15 with Cookus?

you are one seriously clueless clown.

Says the board jester.
 
1972 said:
grizcycling said:
I'm good with this but boy is this offense predicated on the QB!

Does everyone realize we were using our 4th string QB, look at how different NAU looked with their 2nd string. Think how this game would have played out if we had our 2nd string and they had theirs. Come on folks, I know it was ugly, but we won with our 4th string QB.
Get out of here with your relevant facts 🤨
 
I'm saying the Griz D held them to 15. Too Bad for NAU Cookus was a dumbass! Anything else is speculation. Up with Montana Boys!
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
uofmman1122 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
Defense did what they needed to, but I still think NAU puts up 35 if Cookus doesn't get bounced.
And we could put up 45 if Gresch was playing.

See how easy this is?

NAU should be 100% favored with their 2nd string QB over our 4th string QB.

This was a great, gutsy win.

What Gresch would do has nothing to do with the Griz defense. So are you saying the Griz D holds NAU to 15 with Cookus?

All moot point.
Griz won.

Next up
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
uofmman1122 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
Defense did what they needed to, but I still think NAU puts up 35 if Cookus doesn't get bounced.
And we could put up 45 if Gresch was playing.

See how easy this is?

NAU should be 100% favored with their 2nd string QB over our 4th string QB.

This was a great, gutsy win.

What Gresch would do has nothing to do with the Griz defense. So are you saying the Griz D holds NAU to 15 with Cookus?
No, but it doesn’t matter because he’s an idiot and got himself ejected.

Even with that, NAU should have won this game. Any team should be favored over us and our fourth-string QB, who hasn’t played in over two years.
 
uofmman1122 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
uofmman1122 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
Defense did what they needed to, but I still think NAU puts up 35 if Cookus doesn't get bounced.
And we could put up 45 if Gresch was playing.

See how easy this is?

NAU should be 100% favored with their 2nd string QB over our 4th string QB.

This was a great, gutsy win.

What Gresch would do has nothing to do with the Griz defense. So are you saying the Griz D holds NAU to 15 with Cookus?
No, but it doesn’t matter because he’s an idiot and got himself ejected.

Even with that, NAU should have won this game. Any team should be favored over us and our fourth-string QB, who hasn’t played in over two years.

Would really like to see where I stated anything about any of this. What I did say is IMO the Griz defense doesn't look that good if Cookus plays the entire game and doesn't get held to 15.
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
uofmman1122 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
Defense did what they needed to, but I still think NAU puts up 35 if Cookus doesn't get bounced.
And we could put up 45 if Gresch was playing.

See how easy this is?

NAU should be 100% favored with their 2nd string QB over our 4th string QB.

This was a great, gutsy win.

What Gresch would do has nothing to do with the Griz defense. So are you saying the Griz D holds NAU to 15 with Cookus?
can you imagine what this game wold have been if Gresch would have been in the game and Cookus (sp) would have been ejected. Maybe if two Griz weren't ejected and Gresch wouldn't have gone down last week, we would have ended up beating Weebs.. So much speculation
 
grizcycling said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
uofmman1122 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
Defense did what they needed to, but I still think NAU puts up 35 if Cookus doesn't get bounced.
And we could put up 45 if Gresch was playing.

See how easy this is?

NAU should be 100% favored with their 2nd string QB over our 4th string QB.

This was a great, gutsy win.

What Gresch would do has nothing to do with the Griz defense. So are you saying the Griz D holds NAU to 15 with Cookus?
can you imagine what this game wold have been if Gresch would have been in the game and Cookus (sp) would have been ejected. Maybe if two Griz weren't ejected and Gresch wouldn't have gone down last week, we would have ended up beating Weebs.. So much speculation

Which has zero with what I posted.
 
uofmman1122 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
uofmman1122 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
Defense did what they needed to, but I still think NAU puts up 35 if Cookus doesn't get bounced.
And we could put up 45 if Gresch was playing.

See how easy this is?

NAU should be 100% favored with their 2nd string QB over our 4th string QB.

This was a great, gutsy win.

What Gresch would do has nothing to do with the Griz defense. So are you saying the Griz D holds NAU to 15 with Cookus?
No, but it doesn’t matter because he’s an idiot and got himself ejected.

Even with that, NAU should have won this game. Any team should be favored over us and our fourth-string QB, who hasn’t played in over two years.

If it were up to me, Stitt gets a 3-year extension now to help with recruiting. And I love Simis's gutsy play. But what actually happened to our 3rd string QB? I guess it's more accurate to call Simis our 3rd stringer, unless Hill was hurt today. Doesn't matter too much with the win though! :clap:
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
grizcycling said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
uofmman1122 said:
And we could put up 45 if Gresch was playing.

See how easy this is?

NAU should be 100% favored with their 2nd string QB over our 4th string QB.

This was a great, gutsy win.

What Gresch would do has nothing to do with the Griz defense. So are you saying the Griz D holds NAU to 15 with Cookus?
can you imagine what this game wold have been if Gresch would have been in the game and Cookus (sp) would have been ejected. Maybe if two Griz weren't ejected and Gresch wouldn't have gone down last week, we would have ended up beating Weebs.. So much speculation

Which has zero with what I posted.
Who the fuck knows man?
 
What if we had Roper and they had Russell Wilson in this one? I bet the outcome would've been way different. We should talk about that equally relevant thing.
 
1972 said:
grizcycling said:
I'm good with this but boy is this offense predicated on the QB!
Does everyone realize we were using our 4th string QB, look at how different NAU looked with their 2nd string. Think how this game would have played out if we had our 2nd string and they had theirs. Come on folks, I know it was ugly, but we won with our 4th string QB.
"Captain Obvious," I presume. No ... seriously, this was an amazing, gutty performance by an entire team that was determined not to lose. Ugly as it was, the Griz are now 6-3, with a tolerable chance to end at 8-3 and get into the playoffs.
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
uofmman1122 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
uofmman1122 said:
And we could put up 45 if Gresch was playing.

See how easy this is?

NAU should be 100% favored with their 2nd string QB over our 4th string QB.

This was a great, gutsy win.

What Gresch would do has nothing to do with the Griz defense. So are you saying the Griz D holds NAU to 15 with Cookus?
No, but it doesn’t matter because he’s an idiot and got himself ejected.

Even with that, NAU should have won this game. Any team should be favored over us and our fourth-string QB, who hasn’t played in over two years.

Would really like to see where I stated anything about any of this. What I did say is IMO the Griz defense doesn't look that good if Cookus plays the entire game and doesn't get held to 15.
That’s my point. Sure, Cookus would have lit us up for a lot more, but by that same token, Gresch would have put up a lot of offense if he were playing, too. Hypotheticals don’t really mean anything, especially because, once again, on paper there’s no reason NAU should lose to us and our fourth string QB.
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
You are all correct. Griz defense is awesome and the drop off from Cookus to the Freshman meant nothing.
Yet our drop off from freshman to senior was quite noticeable
 
Back
Top