• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Official game day thread GRIZ vs NAU

While I never try to gripe too much, I have been bitching for five years about how we keep throwing a 3-4 yard out route on 3rd and 6 or 7. I don't understand that. I had someone tell me that it is the last resort pass, when nothing else is open, and that is why I see it so much. Then why the fuck is our last resort pass not a slant? A shallow in route? A little cross? Even sending that guy deep on a wild hope and prayer instead of sending him on a short out?

There is no world where we should throw a constant four yard out route when we need 6 or 7 yards. It never works. I honestly just don't get why we keep that in the playbook and rotate to it so heavily. It is a route with no positive potential. There is no positive hope for that play other than "maybe one day the receiver will catch the ball, shake the tackle, and then beat one more tackle for a touchdown." That is what having that route in the package is hoping for. It is not much better than just taking the sack, and that "successful route" is essentially equivalent to just throwing the ball away. Fuck.

I try to stay really positive, but that specific thing makes me scream. I am legitimately upset about it. I don't understand it, and while I give a lot of grace for the coaches knowing more than I do, that seems like football malpractice.
A slant is so quick it is option 1 when run. No way to make it option 4.
 
Lol. They gave up 129 yards every drive to Weber.








OK, not really, but it seemed like it. They’ve given up SIX points so far, so not sure what game you’re watching.
Driving field and eating the clock is their offense. The o had 3 possessions through the first quarter and a half.
 
A slant is so quick it is option 1 when run. No way to make it option 4.
You're factually right about that. I acknowledge that. I was frustrated when I posted that, and you are 100% right. Maybe a double move looking to the out and dragging back in.

My point is just that that specific route has no utility in that situation, and it is a constant feature of our offense, going back between coordinators..
 
Back
Top