o-line

[SaskGriz]

I shall do neither.

My initial post was in reaction to your statement: "The SD d-line will be a good test for the o-line, as Kansas St had trouble moving them last week."

I pointed out that KSU gouged the Coyotes to the tune of 45/297 at 6.6/carry.

I have never disputed that Coach Hauck said both of those things, I'm sure he did. It just doesn't help you prove your initial statement.

Is your entire case for the Coyotes D-Line being good that Coach Hauck said so?

My two points all along have been what Hauck said. You disputed that on multiple occasions. You called me a liar, a time of two. Now, the board can see that you don't have the balls to back up what have said. You just keep trying to change the discussion. You know virtually nothing about the Griz program, and consistently say incorrect things about the program. You never played football at a high level. You don't know or have access to Hauck or any of the coaches. No one on the board posts more incorrect things about Griz football than you do.

Another point/question. Do you think the SD d-line won't be a good test for the UM o-line?

Touche

 

[mthoopsfan]

"Hauck felt the Coyotes’ D-line didn’t get knocked off the ball."

https://missoulian.com/sports/college/big-sky-conference/university-of-montana/five-things-to-watch-no-3-montana-grizzlies-host-south-dakota-coyotes/article_f95ea0da-7d79-5e8d-9392-458b0bf2704e.html

"Montana coach Bobby Hauck’s evaluation of the O-line was “they played well” because “they blocked guys and they protected well.”

"“I like their defensive line,” he said. “They didn’t get knocked off the ball by Kansas State last weekend. I thought they held up really well."

"Montana's young offensive line braces for tougher test against South Dakota"

https://missoulian.com/sports/college/big-sky-conference/university-of-montana/montanas-young-offensive-line-braces-for-tougher-test-against-south-dakota/article_b0336b3d-c3ab-5a52-a409-5271fb97300d.html

Hey, Sask, I was right on everything Hauck said. He also said the o-line's grades were "good". You were wrong on each of these things.

 

[horribilisfan8184]

Nothing to see here but "my stat spin is better than your spin." Two peas at different ends of the pod.

My two points, which Sask disputes, are what Hauck has said. That's not spin. They are facts. Do you want to take those $100 bets?

You usually have good comprehension skills but because this has become an emotional issue I’ll give you a pass. You guys were arguing over actual game stats and what conclusions to draw with your respective cherry-picked stats, which lead to my comment. You now wish to interject Bobby's coach speak praise which has as its goal his players' motivation while not creating billboard fodder for his team's next opponent. I have no dog in the fight, just pointing out the boredom of your pointless pissing match. But you two carry on with making bets that each of you can claim victory on and never pay.

 

[mthoopsfan]

My two points, which Sask disputes, are what Hauck has said. That's not spin. They are facts. Do you want to take those $100 bets?

You usually have good comprehension skills but because this has become an emotional issue I’ll give you a pass. You guys were arguing over actual game stats and what conclusions to draw with your respective cherry-picked stats, which lead to my comment. You now wish to interject Bobby's coach speak praise which has as its goal his players' motivation while not creating billboard fodder for his team's next opponent. I have no dog in the fight, just pointing out the boredom of your pointless pissing match. But you two carry on with making bets that each of you can claim victory on and never pay.

No, the main arguments were over what Hauck had said about the o-line performance and whether KS pushed the SD d-line off the ball.

The argument was not over game stats. I don't believe I opposed any of Sack's stats.

I proved both of my main points, and I have more proof if you want it.

There was no billboard fodder for the opponent by me. The only said by me about the opponent was that their d-line had performed well.

There is nothing emotional in my views or posts. I knew I was right, and I wasn't going to back down to that football idiot.

You do have a dog in the fight. You like to oppose whatever I say. But that's okay, because you are wrong every time.