oGriz
Well-known member
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
Players with impressive stats (Mick Holien, GrizTrax, GoGriz.com).
Statistical comparison of Montana and South Dakota.
Late TD boosts Youngstown State past Coyotes (Argus Leader).
Coyotes still motivated after loss (Argus Leader).
Coyotes’ Earl ‘cool under pressure’ (Volante).
Players with impressive stats
By Mick Holien, GrizTrax, GoGriz.com
http://www.gogriz.com/blog/2013/11/players-with-impressive-stats.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Up Next: South Dakota
South Dakota Coyotes (3-3, 4-5)
Aug 31 W vs. UC Davis, 10-7
Sep 7 L at Kansas, 14-31 FBS
Sep 14 Open
Sep 21 L at Northern Ariz, 16-22 No. 14
Sep 28 L at Western Ill, 10-24
Oct 5 W vs. Missouri State, 17-14
Oct 12 W vs. Indiana State, 17-14
Oct 19 W at Northern Iowa, 38-31 2OT
Oct 26 L at Illinois State, 14-28
Nov 2 L vs. Youngstown St, 34-38 No. 9
Nov 9 vs. Montana No. 10
Nov 16 vs. South Dakota St No. 19
Nov 23 at North Dakota St No. 1
Statistics -- Rankings are for all of FCS
Scoring Offense
11. Montana 39.3 PPG
105. South Dakota 18.9
Scoring Defense
34. Montana 23.2 PPG
34 South Dakota 23.2
- - -
Total Offense
18. Montana 458 YPG
92. South Dakota 335
Total Defense
14. South Dakota 322 YPG
70. Montana 394
3rd Down Conversion Pct
35. Montana 42.0%
100. South Dakota 33.3%
Red Zone Offense
58. Montana 81.6%
115. South Dakota 67.7%
Red Zone Defense
4. Montana 66.7%
61. South Dakota 80.8%
- - -
Rushing Offense
36. Montana 193 YPG
78. South Dakota 149
Rushing Defense
35. Montana 139 YPG
69. South Dakota 179
- - -
PASSING
Passing Efficiency Offense
6. Montana 165.45
103. South Dakota 107.47
Passing Efficiency Defense
15. South Dakota 110.72
74. Montana 133.67
Passing Yards per Completion
3. Montana 15.8 YPC
73. South Dakota 11.4
Passing Offense
22. Montana 265 YPG
78. South Dakota 187
Passing Defense
2. South Dakota 143 YPG
100. Montana 255
Completion Percentage
74. Montana 57.0%
101. South Dakota 52.3%
Passes Had Intercepted
1. Montana 1/265 0.38%
46. South Dakota 8/281 2.85%
Passes Intercepted
9. Montana 13/315 4.13%
31. South Dakota 10/216 4.63%
Pass Sacks Allowed
22. Montana 1.22 SPG
55. South Dakota 1.89
Team Pass Sacks
14. South Dakota 2.89 SPG
67. Montana 1.89
- - -
Turnover Margin
2. Montana 1.6 TOPG
43. South Dakota 0.2
Net Punting
3. Montana 41.3 NYPP
78. South Dakota 34.6
Out of reach: Late TD boosts Youngstown State past Coyotes
By Mick Garry, Argus Leader
http://www.argusleader.com/article/20131103/SPORTS0203/311030022/Out-reach-Late-TD-boosts-Youngstown-State-past-Coyotes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Coyotes still motivated after loss
By Mick Garry, Argus Leader
http://www.argusleader.com/article/20131104/SPORTS0203/311040008/College-football-Coyotes-still-motivated-after-loss" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Coyotes’ Earl ‘cool under pressure’
By Nathan Ellenbecker, Volante (student newspaper)
http://www.volanteonline.com/sports/coyotes-earl-cool-under-pressure/article_caf930ae-4127-11e3-b79b-0019bb30f31a.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Players with impressive stats (Mick Holien, GrizTrax, GoGriz.com).
Statistical comparison of Montana and South Dakota.
Late TD boosts Youngstown State past Coyotes (Argus Leader).
Coyotes still motivated after loss (Argus Leader).
Coyotes’ Earl ‘cool under pressure’ (Volante).
Players with impressive stats
By Mick Holien, GrizTrax, GoGriz.com
http://www.gogriz.com/blog/2013/11/players-with-impressive-stats.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Up Next: South Dakota
South Dakota Coyotes (3-3, 4-5)
Aug 31 W vs. UC Davis, 10-7
Sep 7 L at Kansas, 14-31 FBS
Sep 14 Open
Sep 21 L at Northern Ariz, 16-22 No. 14
Sep 28 L at Western Ill, 10-24
Oct 5 W vs. Missouri State, 17-14
Oct 12 W vs. Indiana State, 17-14
Oct 19 W at Northern Iowa, 38-31 2OT
Oct 26 L at Illinois State, 14-28
Nov 2 L vs. Youngstown St, 34-38 No. 9
Nov 9 vs. Montana No. 10
Nov 16 vs. South Dakota St No. 19
Nov 23 at North Dakota St No. 1
Statistics -- Rankings are for all of FCS
Scoring Offense
11. Montana 39.3 PPG
105. South Dakota 18.9
Scoring Defense
34. Montana 23.2 PPG
34 South Dakota 23.2
- - -
Total Offense
18. Montana 458 YPG
92. South Dakota 335
Total Defense
14. South Dakota 322 YPG
70. Montana 394
3rd Down Conversion Pct
35. Montana 42.0%
100. South Dakota 33.3%
Red Zone Offense
58. Montana 81.6%
115. South Dakota 67.7%
Red Zone Defense
4. Montana 66.7%
61. South Dakota 80.8%
- - -
Rushing Offense
36. Montana 193 YPG
78. South Dakota 149
Rushing Defense
35. Montana 139 YPG
69. South Dakota 179
- - -
PASSING
Passing Efficiency Offense
6. Montana 165.45
103. South Dakota 107.47
Passing Efficiency Defense
15. South Dakota 110.72
74. Montana 133.67
Passing Yards per Completion
3. Montana 15.8 YPC
73. South Dakota 11.4
Passing Offense
22. Montana 265 YPG
78. South Dakota 187
Passing Defense
2. South Dakota 143 YPG
100. Montana 255
Completion Percentage
74. Montana 57.0%
101. South Dakota 52.3%
Passes Had Intercepted
1. Montana 1/265 0.38%
46. South Dakota 8/281 2.85%
Passes Intercepted
9. Montana 13/315 4.13%
31. South Dakota 10/216 4.63%
Pass Sacks Allowed
22. Montana 1.22 SPG
55. South Dakota 1.89
Team Pass Sacks
14. South Dakota 2.89 SPG
67. Montana 1.89
- - -
Turnover Margin
2. Montana 1.6 TOPG
43. South Dakota 0.2
Net Punting
3. Montana 41.3 NYPP
78. South Dakota 34.6
Out of reach: Late TD boosts Youngstown State past Coyotes
By Mick Garry, Argus Leader
http://www.argusleader.com/article/20131103/SPORTS0203/311030022/Out-reach-Late-TD-boosts-Youngstown-State-past-Coyotes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Coyotes still motivated after loss
By Mick Garry, Argus Leader
http://www.argusleader.com/article/20131104/SPORTS0203/311040008/College-football-Coyotes-still-motivated-after-loss" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Coyotes’ Earl ‘cool under pressure’
By Nathan Ellenbecker, Volante (student newspaper)
http://www.volanteonline.com/sports/coyotes-earl-cool-under-pressure/article_caf930ae-4127-11e3-b79b-0019bb30f31a.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
