• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Ncaa won't give No. Carolina any serious penalty

PlayerRep

Well-known member
What a despicable corrupt organization. This decision came from the oversight committee not the staff.

I like North Carolina, but my god, how does the ncaa let them, especially hoops, out of this situation involving clear academic fraud?

And, the Griz, with that dumb ass Engstrom and Jean Gee at the helm, no lawyer for 6 months, and then a B team inexperienced lawyer, losses 4 scholarships and gets other sanctions.

NC got out of this because the committee concluded ii was merely not academic fraud not an impermissible benefit or something that non-athletes didn't get. "200 fraudulent classes over nearly two decades"

"Rather than look squarely at the academic policies, the enforcement staff chose to focus its charges on benefits student-athletes received that were "materially different" from the general student body -- about special arrangements made for student-athletes to be placed in these classes, where they were sure to get an A or a B and stay eligible.

This is the definition of "impermissible benefits." And though Sankey admitted that North Carolina student-athletes "more than likely" received "fraudulent credit" for taking paper classes in the Department of African and Afro-American Studies, and that North Carolina personnel "more than likely" used the courses to "purposely obtain and maintain student-athlete eligibility," the NCAA found it could do nothing."

Does the ncaa think that the mom of the Griz player would not have bailed out any friend of her son or any college kid, whose grandpa called her, concerned, in the middle of the night and asked her to bail out the guys (and then he would pay her back in a week)? That she wouldn't have bailed them out if they weren't football players? Or, that the law firm that represented the guys, who frequently represents college students pro bono, only helped them because they were players, and that their trying to set up a plaintiffs contingency fee case,which is common in MT, was done only because the guys were football players?

http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/21012530/the-ncaa-did-not-impose-sanctions-north-carolina-tar-heels-again-shows-organization-weakness
 
Saw this on a talking head sports show yesterday. Cost them 18 million in legal costs, but they bought themselves out of trouble.
 
grizeyes said:
Saw this on a talking head sports show yesterday. Cost them 18 million in legal costs, but they bought themselves out of trouble.

Probably the best $18mil that they’ve ever spent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
GrizMusician said:
grizeyes said:
Saw this on a talking head sports show yesterday. Cost them 18 million in legal costs, but they bought themselves out of trouble.

Probably the best $18mil that they’ve ever spent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep. That was discussed. The losses from ncaa penalties would have far exceeded 18 million.
 
BadlandsGrizFan said:
Why would the NCAA punish their bell cows when they can make examples out of little ole Montana?

To be fair, the NCAA didn’t sanction Montana. At least that was my understanding. The sanctions were self imposed by the UM administration led by Engstrom.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
hm.grwn.grizfan said:
BadlandsGrizFan said:
Why would the NCAA punish their bell cows when they can make examples out of little ole Montana?

To be fair, the NCAA didn’t sanction Montana. At least that was my understanding. The sanctions were self imposed by the UM administration led by Engstrom.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Correct. :?
 
grizeyes said:
GrizMusician said:
grizeyes said:
Saw this on a talking head sports show yesterday. Cost them 18 million in legal costs, but they bought themselves out of trouble.
Probably the best $18mil that they’ve ever spent.
Yep. That was discussed. The losses from ncaa penalties would have far exceeded 18 million.
"The Shark" had it right all along ... with the famous Tarkanian quote: "The NCAA was so mad at Kentucky they gave Cleveland State two more years of probation."

Or, if he was talking to SoCal audience: "The NCAA is gonna get so upset at UCLA, they'll put Northridge on two years probation."
 
IdaGriz01 said:
grizeyes said:
GrizMusician said:
grizeyes said:
Saw this on a talking head sports show yesterday. Cost them 18 million in legal costs, but they bought themselves out of trouble.
Probably the best $18mil that they’ve ever spent.
Yep. That was discussed. The losses from ncaa penalties would have far exceeded 18 million.
"The Shark" had it right all along ... with the famous Tarkanian quote: "The NCAA was so mad at Kentucky they gave Cleveland State two more years of probation."

Or, if he was talking to SoCal audience: "The NCAA is gonna get so upset at UCLA, they'll put Northridge on two years probation."

Great quotes! Loved that towel sucking little loon! The world got a little duller when the Shark took his leave.
 
:grenade: :puke:
MissoulaMarinerFan said:
hm.grwn.grizfan said:
BadlandsGrizFan said:
Why would the NCAA punish their bell cows when they can make examples out of little ole Montana?

To be fair, the NCAA didn’t sanction Montana. At least that was my understanding. The sanctions were self imposed by the UM administration led by Engstrom.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Correct. :?
 
Back
Top