• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

NCAA Should Issue Formal Apology to UM, for bad refs

Eriul said:
marceagfan5 said:
I'll admit I didn't see the game, but even if all these calls go the Griz way and not CCU's way, didn't CCU still end the game on the Griz 15 yard line? Wouldn't they most likely have scored to win the game anyways?

Not trying to cause an argument, just curious on the Griz thoughts...


Umm well that drive started with an excessive celebration penalty on us that was less than 2 celebrations they had that weren't called and I believe they also advanced the ball on a fumble I heard? Not sure the ruling but I think someone said that was also a mistake. It's not necessarily one call. It's that the game was filled with a ton of bad calls that 100% changed the game. Would the outcome be different? I dunno and no one will know because the refs were a huge influence in this game.

It's a conspiracy... and everyone is in on it.
 
poorgriz said:
Eriul said:
marceagfan5 said:
I'll admit I didn't see the game, but even if all these calls go the Griz way and not CCU's way, didn't CCU still end the game on the Griz 15 yard line? Wouldn't they most likely have scored to win the game anyways?

Not trying to cause an argument, just curious on the Griz thoughts...


Umm well that drive started with an excessive celebration penalty on us that was less than 2 celebrations they had that weren't called and I believe they also advanced the ball on a fumble I heard? Not sure the ruling but I think someone said that was also a mistake. It's not necessarily one call. It's that the game was filled with a ton of bad calls that 100% changed the game. Would the outcome be different? I dunno and no one will know because the refs were a huge influence in this game.

It's a conspiracy... and everyone is in on it.

More words in my mouth. *yawn*. Dunno how to have an intellectual conversation when egriz posters so black/white.
 
Eriul said:
poorgriz said:
Eriul said:
marceagfan5 said:
I'll admit I didn't see the game, but even if all these calls go the Griz way and not CCU's way, didn't CCU still end the game on the Griz 15 yard line? Wouldn't they most likely have scored to win the game anyways?

Not trying to cause an argument, just curious on the Griz thoughts...


Umm well that drive started with an excessive celebration penalty on us that was less than 2 celebrations they had that weren't called and I believe they also advanced the ball on a fumble I heard? Not sure the ruling but I think someone said that was also a mistake. It's not necessarily one call. It's that the game was filled with a ton of bad calls that 100% changed the game. Would the outcome be different? I dunno and no one will know because the refs were a huge influence in this game.

It's a conspiracy... and everyone is in on it.

More words in my mouth. *yawn*. Dunno how to have an intellectual conversation when egriz posters so black/white.

Says the queen of putting words in someone's mouth. :roll:
 
AZGrizFan said:
Eriul said:
poorgriz said:
Eriul said:
Umm well that drive started with an excessive celebration penalty on us that was less than 2 celebrations they had that weren't called and I believe they also advanced the ball on a fumble I heard? Not sure the ruling but I think someone said that was also a mistake. It's not necessarily one call. It's that the game was filled with a ton of bad calls that 100% changed the game. Would the outcome be different? I dunno and no one will know because the refs were a huge influence in this game.

It's a conspiracy... and everyone is in on it.

More words in my mouth. *yawn*. Dunno how to have an intellectual conversation when egriz posters so black/white.

Says the queen of putting words in someone's mouth. :roll:


I literally quoted your statements. Sorry if your statements don't mean what you say. "Easily covering putting $1000 on them to cover." "Any armchair qb could tell that he griz were fatally flawed." Two thoughts you portrayed 4 days apart. I called you out for being black/white and you got pissed. You're still unwilling to admit that both teams were good and it was a close game...
 
Eriul said:
AZGrizFan said:
Eriul said:
poorgriz said:
It's a conspiracy... and everyone is in on it.

More words in my mouth. *yawn*. Dunno how to have an intellectual conversation when egriz posters so black/white.

Says the queen of putting words in someone's mouth. :roll:


I literally quoted your statements. Sorry if your statements don't mean what you say. "Easily covering putting $1000 on them to cover." "Any armchair qb could tell that he griz were fatally flawed." Two thoughts you portrayed 4 days apart. I called you out for being black/white and you got pissed. You're still unwilling to admit that both teams were good and it was a close game...

You are an idiot, plain and simple. Quoting statements and them completely misinterpreting them in your own rants... :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

Big cry baby, is what you are. :lol:

By the way, being fatally flawed doesn't mean the Griz weren't "good". They just weren't good ENOUGH. They were 7 points worse....but it was a close game. I blame the refs. ;)
 
AZGrizFan said:
Eriul said:
AZGrizFan said:
Eriul said:
More words in my mouth. *yawn*. Dunno how to have an intellectual conversation when egriz posters so black/white.

Says the queen of putting words in someone's mouth. :roll:


I literally quoted your statements. Sorry if your statements don't mean what you say. "Easily covering putting $1000 on them to cover." "Any armchair qb could tell that he griz were fatally flawed." Two thoughts you portrayed 4 days apart. I called you out for being black/white and you got pissed. You're still unwilling to admit that both teams were good and it was a close game...

You are an idiot, plain and simple. Quoting statements and them completely misinterpreting them in your own rants... :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

Big cry baby, is what you are. :lol:

By the way, being fatally flawed doesn't mean the Griz weren't "good". They just weren't good ENOUGH. They were 7 points worse....but it was a close game. I blame the refs. ;)


Umm... I have a BA in English and in my bold opinion I would think "fatally flawed" and "good" contradict each other.

Maybe you should used the term "flawed."

No one on here also claimed that the Griz would have won had the call been correct. It's pretty well documented that I have claimed that the game would have been much different if it wasn't for the NUMEROUS "flaws" that the reffing crew held the entire game. I would be bitching just as hard if there were this many flaws that influenced the game in our favor. It just so happened that these flaws ALL went negatively towards the Griz except the 1 which was the catch(which I still haven't really looked at closely to tell, at the time of the game it was too close for me to decide but I hear that it was favorable to us which is just another example of the piss poor reffing.)
 
Bottom line on this whole thread, the NCAA MIGHT, and I emphasize might, release a statement only because CBS and some others have caught wind of the gaffe saying something like..."The officials did not run the replay process correctly, we strive to manage the game with precision and integrity, blah blah blah"...and that will be it.

That and 50 cents gets you a cup of joe at Food For Thought. :coffee:
 
Eriul said:
AZGrizFan said:
Eriul said:
AZGrizFan said:
Says the queen of putting words in someone's mouth. :roll:


I literally quoted your statements. Sorry if your statements don't mean what you say. "Easily covering putting $1000 on them to cover." "Any armchair qb could tell that he griz were fatally flawed." Two thoughts you portrayed 4 days apart. I called you out for being black/white and you got pissed. You're still unwilling to admit that both teams were good and it was a close game...

You are an idiot, plain and simple. Quoting statements and them completely misinterpreting them in your own rants... :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

Big cry baby, is what you are. :lol:

By the way, being fatally flawed doesn't mean the Griz weren't "good". They just weren't good ENOUGH. They were 7 points worse....but it was a close game. I blame the refs. ;)


Umm... I have a BA in English and in my bold opinion I would think "fatally flawed" and "good" contradict each other.

Maybe you should used the term "flawed."

No one on here also claimed that the Griz would have won had the call been correct. It's pretty well documented that I have claimed that the game would have been much different if it wasn't for the NUMEROUS "flaws" that the reffing crew held the entire game. I would be bitching just as hard if there were this many flaws that influenced the game in our favor. It just so happened that these flaws ALL went negatively towards the Griz except the 1 which was the catch(which I still haven't really looked at closely to tell, at the time of the game it was too close for me to decide but I hear that it was favorable to us which is just another example of the piss poor reffing.)
A BA in English, eh? That explains why you're still in school...And a team can be fatally flawed and still be good. This year's Griz are exhibit A. They were able to overcome their flaws most of the time, but there were too many to overcome once the competition was stepped up. We've discussed their weaknesses ad nauseam all season...Coastal just had the right game plan and personnel to exploit our obvious weaknesses.
 
AZGrizFan said:
Eriul said:
AZGrizFan said:
Eriul said:
I literally quoted your statements. Sorry if your statements don't mean what you say. "Easily covering putting $1000 on them to cover." "Any armchair qb could tell that he griz were fatally flawed." Two thoughts you portrayed 4 days apart. I called you out for being black/white and you got pissed. You're still unwilling to admit that both teams were good and it was a close game...

You are an idiot, plain and simple. Quoting statements and them completely misinterpreting them in your own rants... :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

Big cry baby, is what you are. :lol:

By the way, being fatally flawed doesn't mean the Griz weren't "good". They just weren't good ENOUGH. They were 7 points worse....but it was a close game. I blame the refs. ;)


Umm... I have a BA in English and in my bold opinion I would think "fatally flawed" and "good" contradict each other.

Maybe you should used the term "flawed."

No one on here also claimed that the Griz would have won had the call been correct. It's pretty well documented that I have claimed that the game would have been much different if it wasn't for the NUMEROUS "flaws" that the reffing crew held the entire game. I would be bitching just as hard if there were this many flaws that influenced the game in our favor. It just so happened that these flaws ALL went negatively towards the Griz except the 1 which was the catch(which I still haven't really looked at closely to tell, at the time of the game it was too close for me to decide but I hear that it was favorable to us which is just another example of the piss poor reffing.)
A BA in English, eh? That explains why you're still in school...And a team can be fatally flawed and still be good. This year's Griz are exhibit A. They were able to overcome their flaws most of the time, but there were too many to overcome once the competition was stepped up. We've discussed their weaknesses ad nauseam all season...Coastal just had the right game plan and personnel to exploit our obvious weaknesses.

Also got a bachelor's in history and am in Master's school for Business Admin. Any more comments about my education at 23 years old?

Also I thought CCU was "on level with PSU?"

p.s. your term fatally flawed is a fatally flawed one. Maybe try using the term exposable or just flawed. You give off WAY too many bad interpretations.
 
AZGrizFan said:
A BA in English, eh? That explains why you're still in school...And a team can be fatally flawed and still be good. They were able to overcome their flaws most of the time, but there were too many to overcome once the competition was stepped up. We've discussed their weaknesses ad nauseam all season...Coastal just had the right game plan and personnel to exploit our obvious weaknesses.

talk about playing semantics. aren't your c'boys on tv soon? you need a break.
 
Eriul said:
AZGrizFan said:
Eriul said:
AZGrizFan said:
Says the queen of putting words in someone's mouth. :roll:


I literally quoted your statements. Sorry if your statements don't mean what you say. "Easily covering putting $1000 on them to cover." "Any armchair qb could tell that he griz were fatally flawed." Two thoughts you portrayed 4 days apart. I called you out for being black/white and you got pissed. You're still unwilling to admit that both teams were good and it was a close game...

You are an idiot, plain and simple. Quoting statements and them completely misinterpreting them in your own rants... :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

Big cry baby, is what you are. :lol:

By the way, being fatally flawed doesn't mean the Griz weren't "good". They just weren't good ENOUGH. They were 7 points worse....but it was a close game. I blame the refs. ;)


Umm... I have a BA in English and in my bold opinion I would think "fatally flawed" and "good" contradict each other.

Maybe you should used the term "flawed."

No one on here also claimed that the Griz would have won had the call been correct. It's pretty well documented that I have claimed that the game would have been much different if it wasn't for the NUMEROUS "flaws" that the reffing crew held the entire game. I would be bitching just as hard if there were this many flaws that influenced the game in our favor. It just so happened that these flaws ALL went negatively towards the Griz except the 1 which was the catch(which I still haven't really looked at closely to tell, at the time of the game it was too close for me to decide but I hear that it was favorable to us which is just another example of the piss poor reffing.)

Ha ha... Um yaaaaaa, sherrrr ya would. Lol
 
Nah, we don't need apologies or anything like that. We need to accept that the Griz were damned lucky to be 10-2 going into the playoffs, accept that they lost fair and clear in the playoffs, and move on to 2014 ... which I fear will not be as good.
 
poorgriz said:
Eriul said:
AZGrizFan said:
Eriul said:
I literally quoted your statements. Sorry if your statements don't mean what you say. "Easily covering putting $1000 on them to cover." "Any armchair qb could tell that he griz were fatally flawed." Two thoughts you portrayed 4 days apart. I called you out for being black/white and you got pissed. You're still unwilling to admit that both teams were good and it was a close game...

You are an idiot, plain and simple. Quoting statements and them completely misinterpreting them in your own rants... :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

Big cry baby, is what you are. :lol:

By the way, being fatally flawed doesn't mean the Griz weren't "good". They just weren't good ENOUGH. They were 7 points worse....but it was a close game. I blame the refs. ;)


Umm... I have a BA in English and in my bold opinion I would think "fatally flawed" and "good" contradict each other.

Maybe you should used the term "flawed."

No one on here also claimed that the Griz would have won had the call been correct. It's pretty well documented that I have claimed that the game would have been much different if it wasn't for the NUMEROUS "flaws" that the reffing crew held the entire game. I would be bitching just as hard if there were this many flaws that influenced the game in our favor. It just so happened that these flaws ALL went negatively towards the Griz except the 1 which was the catch(which I still haven't really looked at closely to tell, at the time of the game it was too close for me to decide but I hear that it was favorable to us which is just another example of the piss poor reffing.)

Ha ha... Um yaaaaaa, sherrrr ya would. Lol


Umm I made it clear that I was cheering for Auburn in the iron bowl yet I was the only one on this board to point out the horrible ref blunder on their 2nd to last td... So yah, I actually have a history of not agreeing with referees regardless of which side the calls wer eon.
 
Considering sending the following off to [email protected] and would like a quick grammatical review from Eriul:

I have a rule question, but first a little background. I have two jobs, one being a football official in the Southland Conference and the other being a cosplay clown where I do skits nationally, specializing as an Auguste Clown.

For my buddy grizzlemoose:

http://www.humourfoundation.com.au/resources/history-of-clowning.html#Types" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; of Clown

Recently my clown association received a call to fly to Pittsburgh to reenact Super Bowl XL for the three surviving members (the ones that didn’t take steroids) of the ‘70’s Steelers teams. Seems they are really into pantomime which isn’t really our schtick but I digress as apparently Bradshaw is the only one that can tell the difference and he just likes the cheap laughs and we do this every year. My clown buddies and I hop on the plane headed for Pittsburgh and after a much longer flight than expected we get off the plane and are greeted by someone wearing a Red’s Bar hat and an envelope stuffed with twenty $5 bills. Apparently he mistakes us for the actual game officials for some playoff game in Missoula, Montana (never let the Tramp Clown make your reservations) and they have been waiting our arrival. Given that we were about to receive double what we would have been paid for the Pittsburgh job, we said “we can do this” and off we went.

Late in the third quarter – maybe it was the fourth, we were hitting the schnapps at halftime – we’re looking forward to getting off the frozen tundra when suddenly the home team starts mounting a comeback. If you’ve ever worn clown shoes on the frozen tundra you know that those big, bulbous areas at the toes are just empty space with no insulation and I was beginning to lose all feeling in my big toe. And I’m sure you know that of all the toes, the big one is the most important one to an Auguste Clown, but I again digress.

So I get a call from the Hobo Clown in the booth – who at the time was making reservations to Moose Jaw for our return flight for a Strange Brew convention – who thought he saw something a few plays back and attempted to activate my joy buzzer. Luckily I had the remote-activated salted chocolate balls “snake can” in my pants as a backup in the event of a frozen actuator on the joy buzzer, and the salted chocolate balls device did work, albeit a couple plays after the perceived infraction. We decided to go back to mid-3rd quarter and marked the ball for Montana 2ND and 7, five yards deep in their own end zone, forgetting that the actual goal was to get off the frozen tundra to save my frozen big toe.

My question is, do we need to reimburse the Southland Conference for the expense of the schnapps (listed as Mo Club Go Juice on the Tramp Clown's expense report)?
 
Eriul said:
AZGrizFan said:
Eriul said:
AZGrizFan said:
You are an idiot, plain and simple. Quoting statements and them completely misinterpreting them in your own rants... :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

Big cry baby, is what you are. :lol:

By the way, being fatally flawed doesn't mean the Griz weren't "good". They just weren't good ENOUGH. They were 7 points worse....but it was a close game. I blame the refs. ;)


Umm... I have a BA in English and in my bold opinion I would think "fatally flawed" and "good" contradict each other.

Maybe you should used the term "flawed."

No one on here also claimed that the Griz would have won had the call been correct. It's pretty well documented that I have claimed that the game would have been much different if it wasn't for the NUMEROUS "flaws" that the reffing crew held the entire game. I would be bitching just as hard if there were this many flaws that influenced the game in our favor. It just so happened that these flaws ALL went negatively towards the Griz except the 1 which was the catch(which I still haven't really looked at closely to tell, at the time of the game it was too close for me to decide but I hear that it was favorable to us which is just another example of the piss poor reffing.)
A BA in English, eh? That explains why you're still in school...And a team can be fatally flawed and still be good. This year's Griz are exhibit A. They were able to overcome their flaws most of the time, but there were too many to overcome once the competition was stepped up. We've discussed their weaknesses ad nauseam all season...Coastal just had the right game plan and personnel to exploit our obvious weaknesses.

Also got a bachelor's in history and am in Master's school for Business Admin. Any more comments about my education at 23 years old?

Also I thought CCU was "on level with PSU?"

p.s. your term fatally flawed is a fatally flawed one. Maybe try using the term exposable or just flawed. You give off WAY too many bad interpretations.

I will withhold any additional comments on your education. A bachelors in English and a bachelors in History speak for themselves.

And I said I THOUGHT CCU was on the same level as PSU. I have already admitted my mistake. Why is that so hard to understand? We were EXACTLY who I thought we were...played basically the same game we have played all year. CCU was considerably better than I had thought...case closed. And I will use whatever fucking terms I want. I don't need an English teacher, thank you very little.
 
Bulletin: There are reports of someone seen crouching behind a grassy knoll on Mt Sentinel co-conspiring thru an ear bud with that thieving Southland officiating crew... :idea:
 
Silvertip said:
Bulletin: There are reports of someone seen crouching behind a grassy knoll on Mt Sentinel co-conspiring thru an ear bud with that thieving Southland officiating crew... :idea:

:lol:

And I heard the moon landing was faked too! :shock:
 
Bluenoser said:
Considering sending the following off to [email protected] and would like a quick grammatical review from Eriul:

I have a rule question, but first a little background. I have two jobs, one being a football official in the Southland Conference and the other being a cosplay clown where I do skits nationally, specializing as an Auguste Clown.

For my buddy grizzlemoose:

http://www.humourfoundation.com.au/resources/history-of-clowning.html#Types" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; of Clown

Recently my clown association received a call to fly to Pittsburgh to reenact Super Bowl XL for the three surviving members (the ones that didn’t take steroids) of the ‘70’s Steelers teams. Seems they are really into pantomime which isn’t really our schtick but I digress as apparently Bradshaw is the only one that can tell the difference and he just likes the cheap laughs and we do this every year. My clown buddies and I hop on the plane headed for Pittsburgh and after a much longer flight than expected we get off the plane and are greeted by someone wearing a Red’s Bar hat and an envelope stuffed with twenty $5 bills. Apparently he mistakes us for the actual game officials for some playoff game in Missoula, Montana (never let the Tramp Clown make your reservations) and they have been waiting our arrival. Given that we were about to receive double what we would have been paid for the Pittsburgh job, we said “we can do this” and off we went.

Late in the third quarter – maybe it was the fourth, we were hitting the schnapps at halftime – we’re looking forward to getting off the frozen tundra when suddenly the home team starts mounting a comeback. If you’ve ever worn clown shoes on the frozen tundra you know that those big, bulbous areas at the toes are just empty space with no insulation and I was beginning to lose all feeling in my big toe. And I’m sure you know that of all the toes, the big one is the most important one to an Auguste Clown, but I again digress.

So I get a call from the Hobo Clown in the booth – who at the time was making reservations to Moose Jaw for our return flight for a Strange Brew convention – who thought he saw something a few plays back and attempted to activate my joy buzzer. Luckily I had the remote-activated salted chocolate balls “snake can” in my pants as a backup in the event of a frozen actuator on the joy buzzer, and the salted chocolate balls device did work, albeit a couple plays after the perceived infraction. We decided to go back to mid-3rd quarter and marked the ball for Montana 2ND and 7, five yards deep in their own end zone, forgetting that the actual goal was to get off the frozen tundra to save my frozen big toe.

My question is, do we need to reimburse the Southland Conference for the expense of the schnapps (listed as Mo Club Go Juice on the Tramp Clown's expense report)?

Well done Noser, well done :clap: :clap: LMAO!!!
 
Back
Top