• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

NCAA rules changes for 2012

gah-riz said:
MissoulaMarinerFan said:
I understand it's copy right laws, but it still doesn't answer my question. Sounds to me that they are doing it because they can. I would understand if they had longer highlights on their official website that you had to pay for, but they do not. Why would they limit exposure to their conference? I mean, really, in the real world, who gives 2 craps about the Big Sky Conference out of those in it, and some of the FCS?
Click to expand...

Don't know man. Perhaps it had something to do with negotiating the new TV deal and them not wanting Root or anyone else thinking the conference allows lengthy "rebroadcast" via the internet. I agree, the Big Sky can usr all the exposure it can get.
Click to expand...
That makes sense (new tv deal). Thanks for your insight. I just find this baffling, because joe blow w/an email address can rewatch all the games on big suck tv (which has actually been somewhat decent this year), but lengthy highlights can't be made and accessed for free? Anywayz, thanks for your insight. It makes sense, I just don't like it. :ugeek:
 
Helmet one is the only I agree with. Maybe it'll cut back on the disgusting amount of dreads in football. NFL should do the same, or make it a penalty for them.
 
Willie said:
Helmet one is the only I agree with. Maybe it'll cut back on the disgusting amount of dreads in football. NFL should do the same, or make it a penalty for them.
Click to expand...

Why don't they just make it legal to tackle by the hair? Seems like that would take care of it.
 
TxGriz said:
Willie said:
Helmet one is the only I agree with. Maybe it'll cut back on the disgusting amount of dreads in football. NFL should do the same, or make it a penalty for them.
Click to expand...

Why don't they just make it legal to tackle by the hair? Seems like that would take care of it.
Click to expand...
I think it is legal to tackle by the hair, can't horsecollar style with it but pretty sure if someone loses a dred it's tough crap.
 
Willie said:
Helmet one is the only I agree with. Maybe it'll cut back on the disgusting amount of dreads in football. NFL should do the same, or make it a penalty for them.
Click to expand...

The Dreads hate your hair, too. But you can keep it. :thumb:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top