• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Momentum Killers

fltheadgriz

Well-known member
In the NDSU game the Griz had two huge momentum killers.
First one was when O'Connell got the fumble recovery yet Hauck got a holding call.

The next one was in the socond half when NDSU was pinned deep and Hauck nailed for a lit hit (Graves got called for it).

You can see the defense just hang their heads after each of these two calls.

I will say this one thing though. I counted 7 times that it showed on the game where there were blatant holds by NDSU and the refs did nothing. The one time that was more than obvious was on one of the long runs an NDSU player was holding Welnel. The NDSU player had his left hand on front of Welenel's jersey and his right hand on the back of his jersey.

And do not get me started about when Johnson went down. Blatant face mask and his butt touches the ground before he fumled but YET it is reviewed and called a fumble.

These would not have changed the outcome of the game but they would have made the game more interesting.

I did like the 3-3-5 defense until this game when everyone packed the box on the two long explosive runs that NDSU had. No assignment football and that should have been R. Hauck that was in the back field and not one trying to get the next tackle.
 
fltheadgriz said:
In the NDSU game the Griz had two huge momentum killers.
First one was when O'Connell got the fumble recovery yet Hauck got a holding call.

The next one was in the socond half when NDSU was pinned deep and Hauck nailed for a lit hit (Graves got called for it).

You can see the defense just hang their heads after each of these two calls.

I will say this one thing though. I counted 7 times that it showed on the game where there were blatant holds by NDSU and the refs did nothing. The one time that was more than obvious was on one of the long runs an NDSU player was holding Welnel. The NDSU player had his left hand on front of Welenel's jersey and his right hand on the back of his jersey.

And do not get me started about when Johnson went down. Blatant face mask and his butt touches the ground before he fumled but YET it is reviewed and called a fumble.

These would not have changed the outcome of the game but they would have made the game more interesting.

I did like the 3-3-5 defense until this game when everyone packed the box on the two long explosive runs that NDSU had. No assignment football and that should have been R. Hauck that was in the back field and not one trying to get the next tackle.
I posted a picture in another thread where the ball is out and you can see nothing is down. Not his butt, nor his elbow or knees. They absolutely missed the facemask, but he wasn't down.

Agree with the rest of your post, though, although we also held them a lot and it wasn't called.
 
I saw the picture you posted but that thread was locked. Yes LJ's right leg is not down but please look under the NDSU defender tackling him, that is LJs leg down.
 
fltheadgriz said:
I saw the picture you posted but that thread was locked. Yes LJ's right leg is not down but please look under the NDSU defender tackling him, that is LJs leg down.
It's not, and you can clearly see it if you watch the replay. It never touches the ground at all before he rolls onto his back. This is why the replay officials so quickly upheld the call.
 
Face mask was obvious and not called. Hard to understand why it was missed. I thought QBs were supposed to get extra protection?
 
uofmman1122 said:
fltheadgriz said:
I saw the picture you posted but that thread was locked. Yes LJ's right leg is not down but please look under the NDSU defender tackling him, that is LJs leg down.
It's not, and you can clearly see it if you watch the replay. It never touches the ground at all before he rolls onto his back. This is why the replay officials so quickly upheld the call.


Yep, An obvious face-mask, which was not called, and would have negated the fumble.
 
RoseyMustGo said:
uofmman1122 said:
It's not, and you can clearly see it if you watch the replay. It never touches the ground at all before he rolls onto his back. This is why the replay officials so quickly upheld the call.


Yep, An obvious face-mask, which was not called, and would have negated the fumble.
Yeah, and unfortunately they can't retroactively assess a penalty that wasn't called on the play. We got screwed there, but unfortunately for us he wasn't down.
 
If leagues are going to puss out and use replay (I fucking hate it, in ANY sport), then if a play is reviewed, EVERYTHING should be on the table. Not just what was called, but what was MISSED as well. Otherwise, you’re mostly just putting lipstick on a pig as far as the reffing goes.
 
uofmman1122 said:
RoseyMustGo said:
Yep, An obvious face-mask, which was not called, and would have negated the fumble.
Yeah, and unfortunately they can't retroactively assess a penalty that wasn't called on the play. We got screwed there, but unfortunately for us he wasn't down.

Stupid playcall. A minute to go in the half and you're back in game. Run the clock out and take all of the momentum into the locker room. Get the ball to start the second half and take control. Lots of stupid coaching decisions this year but this one was near the top.
 
indiancoyote said:
uofmman1122 said:
Yeah, and unfortunately they can't retroactively assess a penalty that wasn't called on the play. We got screwed there, but unfortunately for us he wasn't down.

Stupid playcall. A minute to go in the half and you're back in game. Run the clock out and take all of the momentum into the locker room. Get the ball to start the second half and take control. Lots of stupid coaching decisions this year but this one was near the top.

Let’s be honest here: the way NDSU was running the ball, if we’d just run into the LOS and then punted they’d have scored in 2 plays anyways. :lol:
 
AZGrizFan said:
indiancoyote said:
Stupid playcall. A minute to go in the half and you're back in game. Run the clock out and take all of the momentum into the locker room. Get the ball to start the second half and take control. Lots of stupid coaching decisions this year but this one was near the top.

Let’s be honest here: the way NDSU was running the ball, if we’d just run into the LOS and then punted they’d have scored in 2 plays anyways. :lol:

Not at that point. The coaches killed our momentum.
 
indiancoyote said:
AZGrizFan said:
Let’s be honest here: the way NDSU was running the ball, if we’d just run into the LOS and then punted they’d have scored in 2 plays anyways. :lol:

Not at that point. The coaches killed our momentum.

We got the ball back and Britt drove the team down for a FG before half. Then we got the 3rd quarter kickoff and immediately went 3 - out. That might have had something to do with momentum as well.

Once could also argue that “momentum” was lost when Walker’s pick-6 was immediately followed up by a 13 second, 1 play 75 yard answer by NDSU.
 
AZGrizFan said:
indiancoyote said:
Not at that point. The coaches killed our momentum.

We got the ball back and Britt drove the team down for a FG before half. Then we got the 3rd quarter kickoff and immediately went 3 - out. That might have had something to do with momentum as well.

Once could also argue that “momentum” was lost when Walker’s pick-6 was immediately followed up by a 13 second, 1 play 75 yard answer by NDSU.

What was the score with a minute left in the half?
 
indiancoyote said:
AZGrizFan said:
We got the ball back and Britt drove the team down for a FG before half. Then we got the 3rd quarter kickoff and immediately went 3 - out. That might have had something to do with momentum as well.

Once could also argue that “momentum” was lost when Walker’s pick-6 was immediately followed up by a 13 second, 1 play 75 yard answer by NDSU.

What was the score with a minute left in the half?

14-10.
Then 21-10.
Then 21-13.
Then 21-20.
Then 28-20.
Then 35-20.
Then 42-20.
Then 49-20.
 
AZGrizFan said:
indiancoyote said:
What was the score with a minute left in the half?

14-10.
Then 21-10.
Then 21-13.
Then 21-20.
Then 28-20.
Then 35-20.
Then 42-20.
Then 49-20.

Yep, 14-10 going into half. We had the momentum and would have placed a small seed of drought in their minds.
 
indiancoyote said:
AZGrizFan said:
14-10.
Then 21-10.
Then 21-13.
Then 21-20.
Then 28-20.
Then 35-20.
Then 42-20.
Then 49-20.

Yep, 14-10 going into half. We had the momentum and would have placed a small seed of drought in their minds.

And as my uncle used to say, a seed in the mind is worth two in a drought.
 
indiancoyote said:
AZGrizFan said:
14-10.
Then 21-10.
Then 21-13.
Then 21-20.
Then 28-20.
Then 35-20.
Then 42-20.
Then 49-20.

Yep, 14-10 going into half. We had the momentum and would have placed a small seed of drought in their minds.

We placed a seed in their drought at 21-20 and they answered by raining TD’s down upon us (see what I did there??). So no, momentum wasn’t “lost” or “killed”. We scored, and they responded with a FLOOD of touchdowns. (Again, see what I did there? Seed? Drought? Flood?). .
 
AZGrizFan said:
indiancoyote said:
Yep, 14-10 going into half. We had the momentum and would have placed a small seed of drought in their minds.

We placed a seed in their drought at 21-20 and they answered by raining TD’s down upon us (see what I did there??). So no, momentum wasn’t “lost” or “killed”. We scored, and they responded with a FLOOD of touchdowns. (Again, see what I did there? Seed? Drought? Flood?). .

They responded and took control, and our weak ass approach to gap integrity in the run game gave them big play after big play. Including multiple 1-3 play drives. Even Entz said post game he was just hoping to get long sustained drives in those situations, but the offense had other plans.
 
Wolf777 said:
AZGrizFan said:
We placed a seed in their drought at 21-20 and they answered by raining TD’s down upon us (see what I did there??). So no, momentum wasn’t “lost” or “killed”. We scored, and they responded with a FLOOD of touchdowns. (Again, see what I did there? Seed? Drought? Flood?). .

They responded and took control, and our weak ass approach to gap integrity in the run game gave them big play after big play. Including multiple 1-3 play drives. Even Entz said post game he was just hoping to get long sustained drives in those situations, but the offense had other plans.

Somebody watched the MSU game film… :lol:
 
AZGrizFan said:
Wolf777 said:
They responded and took control, and our weak ass approach to gap integrity in the run game gave them big play after big play. Including multiple 1-3 play drives. Even Entz said post game he was just hoping to get long sustained drives in those situations, but the offense had other plans.

Somebody watched the MSU game film… :lol:

Apparently not our coaches. They took the Helen Keller approach to watching that and pretended like it never happened. Time to take the blinders off. 😎
 
Back
Top