Missoulians Dillon K

[AZGrizFan]

Got a bad feeling this piece of crap article has cost Bobby the job....if so I hope there is enough in there for him to go after their ass in court

Hope not, and don't think it will. If Haslam backs away from hiring Hauck, my guess is that he will pushed out as AD sooner than later. He can't afford a mistake at this point. He would disappoint almost all of the top and other significant supporters/boosters, because of a Missoulian article and the Twitter Mob. How much money will he be able to raise from the Twitter mob? If he's even considering this, he is too weak to be the AD, in my view. Not saying he is.

1000%, exactly my view.

10,000% my view. HA!!

 

[CDAGRIZ]

Got a bad feeling this piece of crap article has cost Bobby the job....if so I hope there is enough in there for him to go after their ass in court

Hope not, and don't think it will. If Haslam backs away from hiring Hauck, my guess is that he will pushed out as AD sooner than later. He can't afford a mistake at this point. He would disappoint almost all of the top and other significant supporters/boosters, because of a Missoulian article and the Twitter Mob. How much money will he be able to raise from the Twitter mob? If he's even considering this, he is too weak to be the AD, in my view. Not saying he is.

1000%, exactly my view.

10,000% my view. HA!!

You sonofabitch! Grrr.

 

[AZGrizFan]

Hope not, and don't think it will. If Haslam backs away from hiring Hauck, my guess is that he will pushed out as AD sooner than later. He can't afford a mistake at this point. He would disappoint almost all of the top and other significant supporters/boosters, because of a Missoulian article and the Twitter Mob. How much money will he be able to raise from the Twitter mob? If he's even considering this, he is too weak to be the AD, in my view. Not saying he is.

1000%, exactly my view.

10,000% my view. HA!!

You sonofabitch! Grrr.

Don’t even tempt me, asshole. I can go much, MUCH higher. :twisted: :twisted:

 

[MontanaJack2006]

That is exactly the point! The fact is that the article impugned fault to Bobby Hauck for incidents that happened long after he left the university and had nothing whatsoever to do with.
In this case, the problems noted in the article from 2010 forward, regardless of whether they are true are not are attributed to Hauck. This makes them false by definition. The allegations are in writing and because they are or can be construed as defamatory against the subject are, again by definition, libelous.

I honestly thought the Missoulian was satirical, like The Onion. Is this not the case?

Yes, true. However, The Onion has better editorial leadership and decision making before going to print.

 

[CDAGRIZ]

1000%, exactly my view.

10,000% my view. HA!!

You sonofabitch! Grrr.

Don’t even tempt me, asshole. I can go much, MUCH higher. :twisted: :twisted:

*checks calculator*

I cannot. You win. I bend the knee.

 

[AZGrizFan]

10,000% my view. HA!!

You sonofabitch! Grrr.

Don’t even tempt me, asshole. I can go much, MUCH higher. :twisted: :twisted:

*checks calculator*

I cannot. You win. I bend the knee.

Damned right you do. :ugeek: :ugeek: