MissoulaGriz2000
Active member
Appreciate those details!There are a few streams of information here that I think are important.
1. I have heard similar things about the nature of the scholarship offer from the UM. Not disputing at all the how the program altered that offer. Lincoln was rightly in his power to reject the first year tuition only cover.
2. My understanding they didn't rescind the scholarship because they had over offered but rather a recalculation that wasn't possible in early July. Under the new roster rules scholarships can be divided of which Montana opted into. What I have gathered is the plan was to use the existing 13 scholarship allotment going forward over all 15 players. When they said that, that may have been a reality because as of this moment, I do not know if they athletic department and program are going to offer 15 full rides to mens hoops players. In this new environment it is very much a scenario how Montana kids have been long handled by the staffs of MSU and UM. Their tuition coverage might work as a 1/2 scholarship as a FSE and it allows them to distribute that money elsewhere on the roster. Can't say that was part of the calculation, but it would absolutely make sense. In July when they offered Lincoln a full-ride was a full-ride regardless of he was in-state and out of state.
3. I have heard elsewhere that those payments the UM is expected to offer (up to 250,000 in gross for FB, WBB and MBB) was not likely in the next year or two to be at all or near full value. I don't have confirmation but what has been rumored that players wouldn't get full maximum in terms of those payments. If someone has different information in this regard, by all means, but that is what I heard back in the fall. I do not know if the UM intends to use those House Settlement requirements to create a 'full cost of attendance' environment.
4. I have also heard that broadly speaking that institutional budgets for revenue and non-revenue sports are tighter for all programs as they work to comply with opting into the House budget and doing so in an equitable manner. Per the GFP pod, when they had Haslam on, there were logistic things they were prepared to be able to opt in, but the budgetary piece and the distribution of those funds was a work in progress. Entirely possible the program did in fact have budgetary issues, but since I am not the Chief Financial Officer in the Athletic Department, I am not privy to what the economic motivations are. Have heard outside the UM, that many lower level FBS and an entirety of the FCS levels have payment to the settlement that has created both short and long term budget shortfalls that haven't been allocated through traditional funding mechanisms. I do believe this is why UM brought in Welnel to help speed up revenue generation for the department that didn't rely on its normal home football game funding mechanism and traditional streams of private donations through the GSA, QB, Roundball Clubs to help fund the new reality. Montana isn't going to be hurt as much of its peers, but could be a strange couple of years as the staffs of WBB, MBB in particular have to look into creating more revenue to keep up NIL/House/scholarship demands.
just circling back to my post that I hope the griz go back after him after a year or two in d2. Assuming he does well of course. With that said, I’d also love to see the griz go after some other Montana kids like Brayden Koch and Rey Johnston after this season. I’m assuming the griz will have room for transfers after the season.