Haven't seen mention of it on here yet, but the griz offered Lincoln Rogers from missoula sentinel a few days ago. Great to see an offer go out to a local kid, and Lincoln has great talent and is a great kid. Love to see it, hopefully he commits!
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
MBBALL Lincoln Rogers
- Thread starter nicktaber58
- Start date
Thanks for posting. Glad to see a local kid get an offer.
See it now.
CopperGold14
Well-known member
First Missoula Sentinel griz scholarship player (assuming he commits) since Kellen Hasquet, maybe?
Other Spartans who were Griz Mbb players include …. Brian Morris in the early 80’s.
Other Spartans who were Griz Mbb players include …. Brian Morris in the early 80’s.
WyomingGrizFan
Well-known member
If my memory serves me correctly, there was a Matt Kempfert (1991-94) and a Jordan Hasquet (2004-09). But I think Kempfert was from Hellgate, though. I believe Jordan Hasquet went to Sentinel and was the Gatorade POY for Montana his senior year.
More Griz Sentinel Spartans: Mark O'Hearn, the Rocheleau brothers (Kevin and Kirk), The DeMers brothers (Steve and Ben).
Griz MCHS Spartans (1965 and before): Lou Rocheleau, Bob Cope, Jim Powell, Greg Hanson, Jim Pramenko (sp?), Glenn Smith.
Last edited:
CopperGold14
Well-known member
Matt (and his brother Dave who I think played a bit for the Seahawks) were both Hellgate Knights.
More Hellgate Griz: Sidney Rheinhardt, Ryan Dick, Conner Dick, Mark Reich, Kelly Stensrud, JR Camel.
WyomingGrizFan
Well-known member
Last edited:
Jordan hasquet is the last sentinel kid.
mousegriz1
Well-known member
Big Sky Krysko and KC McGowan....
who apparently has a couple sons who will hoop there too.
who apparently has a couple sons who will hoop there too.
MissoulaGriz2000
Active member
Hopefully griz can get this local kid back here in 1-2 years.
406football
Well-known member
Jordan Hasquet
BelierPeaux
Well-known member
So, we have offered him, correct? And has he committed anywhere yet? Sorry if I am missing something.
MissoulaGriz2000
Active member
Griz offered him a full ride end of July. Then was told in October that they had budget challenges and reduced it to tuition only. He committed to a good d2 in Minnesota a couple days later.
Budget challenges? I think you mean they gave his scholarship to one of those 3 signees.
MissoulaGriz2000
Active member
lol. Yeah exactly. Budget challenges was their PC way of saying it.
There are a few streams of information here that I think are important.
1. I have heard similar things about the nature of the scholarship offer from the UM. Not disputing at all the how the program altered that offer. Lincoln was rightly in his power to reject the first year tuition only cover.
2. My understanding they didn't rescind the scholarship because they had over offered but rather a recalculation that wasn't possible in early July. Under the new roster rules scholarships can be divided of which Montana opted into. What I have gathered is the plan was to use the existing 13 scholarship allotment going forward over all 15 players. When they said that, that may have been a reality because as of this moment, I do not know if they athletic department and program are going to offer 15 full rides to mens hoops players. In this new environment it is very much a scenario how Montana kids have been long handled by the staffs of MSU and UM. Their tuition coverage might work as a 1/2 scholarship as a FSE and it allows them to distribute that money elsewhere on the roster. Can't say that was part of the calculation, but it would absolutely make sense. In July when they offered Lincoln a full-ride was a full-ride regardless of he was in-state and out of state.
3. I have heard elsewhere that those payments the UM is expected to offer (up to 250,000 in gross for FB, WBB and MBB) was not likely in the next year or two to be at all or near full value. I don't have confirmation but what has been rumored that players wouldn't get full maximum in terms of those payments. If someone has different information in this regard, by all means, but that is what I heard back in the fall. I do not know if the UM intends to use those House Settlement requirements to create a 'full cost of attendance' environment.
4. I have also heard that broadly speaking that institutional budgets for revenue and non-revenue sports are tighter for all programs as they work to comply with opting into the House budget and doing so in an equitable manner. Per the GFP pod, when they had Haslam on, there were logistic things they were prepared to be able to opt in, but the budgetary piece and the distribution of those funds was a work in progress. Entirely possible the program did in fact have budgetary issues, but since I am not the Chief Financial Officer in the Athletic Department, I am not privy to what the economic motivations are. Have heard outside the UM, that many lower level FBS and an entirety of the FCS levels have payment to the settlement that has created both short and long term budget shortfalls that haven't been allocated through traditional funding mechanisms. I do believe this is why UM brought in Welnel to help speed up revenue generation for the department that didn't rely on its normal home football game funding mechanism and traditional streams of private donations through the GSA, QB, Roundball Clubs to help fund the new reality. Montana isn't going to be hurt as much of its peers, but could be a strange couple of years as the staffs of WBB, MBB in particular have to look into creating more revenue to keep up NIL/House/scholarship demands.
1. I have heard similar things about the nature of the scholarship offer from the UM. Not disputing at all the how the program altered that offer. Lincoln was rightly in his power to reject the first year tuition only cover.
2. My understanding they didn't rescind the scholarship because they had over offered but rather a recalculation that wasn't possible in early July. Under the new roster rules scholarships can be divided of which Montana opted into. What I have gathered is the plan was to use the existing 13 scholarship allotment going forward over all 15 players. When they said that, that may have been a reality because as of this moment, I do not know if they athletic department and program are going to offer 15 full rides to mens hoops players. In this new environment it is very much a scenario how Montana kids have been long handled by the staffs of MSU and UM. Their tuition coverage might work as a 1/2 scholarship as a FSE and it allows them to distribute that money elsewhere on the roster. Can't say that was part of the calculation, but it would absolutely make sense. In July when they offered Lincoln a full-ride was a full-ride regardless of he was in-state and out of state.
3. I have heard elsewhere that those payments the UM is expected to offer (up to 250,000 in gross for FB, WBB and MBB) was not likely in the next year or two to be at all or near full value. I don't have confirmation but what has been rumored that players wouldn't get full maximum in terms of those payments. If someone has different information in this regard, by all means, but that is what I heard back in the fall. I do not know if the UM intends to use those House Settlement requirements to create a 'full cost of attendance' environment.
4. I have also heard that broadly speaking that institutional budgets for revenue and non-revenue sports are tighter for all programs as they work to comply with opting into the House budget and doing so in an equitable manner. Per the GFP pod, when they had Haslam on, there were logistic things they were prepared to be able to opt in, but the budgetary piece and the distribution of those funds was a work in progress. Entirely possible the program did in fact have budgetary issues, but since I am not the Chief Financial Officer in the Athletic Department, I am not privy to what the economic motivations are. Have heard outside the UM, that many lower level FBS and an entirety of the FCS levels have payment to the settlement that has created both short and long term budget shortfalls that haven't been allocated through traditional funding mechanisms. I do believe this is why UM brought in Welnel to help speed up revenue generation for the department that didn't rely on its normal home football game funding mechanism and traditional streams of private donations through the GSA, QB, Roundball Clubs to help fund the new reality. Montana isn't going to be hurt as much of its peers, but could be a strange couple of years as the staffs of WBB, MBB in particular have to look into creating more revenue to keep up NIL/House/scholarship demands.
