Thanks to this thread, I paid much more attention to Kemp, Krslovic, Breunig, and Weisner against Idaho State. Here is what I am thinking. It is also posted on the GRIZ/ISU game thread.
The GRIZ better shape up their paint help defense before post season play. As is, playing against the Big Sky teams, they cannot be expose as often. A quick passing team with a few high risers can pose problems for the GRIZ defense. When either Kemp or Krslovic come out to help on the perimeter the defense is often exposed to back doors and/or baseline alley oops. Bolomboy is the one conference player capable of taking advantage of this. The other player capable of it is a GRIZ (Breunig). Davidson and EWU beat our defense in a different way, which was quick precise passing. Yes, Krslovic does get back to position slightly quicker than Kemp. Breunig has the best footwork and defensive quickness of the 3 players. Breunig's defensive versatility has been utilized more. He can comfortably defend the paint, perimeter, and penetration, which is rare for post players in the conference.
I did notice during the ISU game, the GRIZ started to address this defensively too. When Weisner was on the court, Breunig and Krslovic were both in better paint help position much more consistently. Those backside lobs being exposed on the baseline were better defended. The reason is because Weisner moves from the paint to the perimeter much better than Kemp and Krslovic do. It is apparent to me, now that Weisner is healthy, his minutes will continue to be high at the expense of Kemp. Weisner gives the GRIZ a lot of defensive versatility, in addition to spreading the court offensively (which Kemp nor Krslovic can do that). It is no coincidence the improved team play has come with Weisner becoming healthy again. Beyond what we see statistically, Weisner has a lot of great variables. He is the perfect 6th man. I've said that since half way through his sophomore season.
I watched more closely how Kemp, Krslovic, Breunig, and Weisner all were used against ISU because of PR starting the Kemp thread. I will also post this there. I honestly feel Kemp's inconsistent minutes and decreased role is because of all the intangibles Weisner brings to the team. I will continue to pay close attention to how our posts are being used to see if there is a pattern developing. In the Weber State game, I will be looking for how the GRIZ prepare for Bolomboy, and the difference in defensive strategy when Bolomboy is sitting.
I am guessing Kemp and Krslovic will be banging him more and test the officiating more often than the 1st game. I expect Breunig and Weisner to each be used in a variety of defensive roles. I will not be surprised to see gradual increased minutes using the Weisner, Breunig, and Krslovic on the court at the same time, with Kemp getting spot minutes. I really like that combination defensively. Krslovic takes care of the banging and rebounding. Breunig is more of a help paint defender to keep in better rebounding position. Weisner to give the GRIZ more defensive perimeter length. That combination allows for each player to have their defensive strengths most utilized.
Now that you know what I will be looking for, starting with the Weber State game, hope you all will be paying more attention to these things too, and see what we can all come up with.