Jordan Harper and Trent McKinney leave the program.

[getgrizzy]

isn't there a three strikes policy for failed m.j. tests? hard to believe harper failed that many in the short time he was here.

anyone confirm that samson k is gone?

Harper's departure had nothing to do with any drug test. Jeez, he's LDS. He probably doesn't even drink.

right, because everybody knows mormons never smoke weed or anything like that. however, if he had done so in 2012, i'm pretty sure the griz would have at least made the semi's.

can't wait to read another p.r. report. this one on how mormons don't drink or smoke pot.

 

[alabamagrizzly]

isn't there a three strikes policy for failed m.j. tests? hard to believe harper failed that many in the short time he was here.

anyone confirm that samson k is gone?

Harper's departure had nothing to do with any drug test. Jeez, he's LDS. He probably doesn't even drink.

Sorry player rep but being a Mormon doesn't exclude you from drug use.

http://www.lightplanet.com/mormons/daily/social_eom.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

SUBSTANCE USE. LDS doctrine prohibits the use of alcohol, tobacco, and other addictive drugs. Among adults and adolescents, usage rates are considerably lower among Latter-day Saints than among other religious groups. Only 28 percent of adult Latter-day Saints say they drink alcohol, compared with 65 percent of Protestants, 85 percent of Catholics, and 86 percent of Jews. Fourteen percent say they smoke tobacco, compared with 36 percent of Protestants, 38 percent of Catholics, and 28 percent of Jews.

The NIDA survey of substance use among high school seniors reveals substantial differences between Latter-day Saints and other religious groups. About 33 percent of LDS high school seniors said they had used alcohol within the previous thirty days, compared to 62 percent of Protestants and 75 percent of Catholics. The percentage of LDS seniors who smoke is half as large as among the other religious groups—14 percent among LDS, 28 percent among Protestants, and 32 percent among Catholics. The differences for marijuana are not as large, but are still lower for LDS students. For example, 14 percent of LDS seniors had used marijuana during the past month, compared to 22 percent among Protestants and 25 percent among Catholics. LDS students also have low rates of cocaine use. Five percent had used cocaine during the past month, compared to 5 percent among Protestants, 7 percent among Catholics, and 8 percent among Jews.(See Abuse of Drugs)

 

[AllWeatherFan]

Following is my analysis of what would have happened in 2012 if a frog had wings.

 

[cclarkblues]

isn't there a three strikes policy for failed m.j. tests? hard to believe harper failed that many in the short time he was here.

anyone confirm that samson k is gone?

Harper's departure had nothing to do with any drug test. Jeez, he's LDS. He probably doesn't even drink.

Sorry player rep but being a Mormon doesn't exclude you from drug use.

http://www.lightplanet.com/mormons/daily/social_eom.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

SUBSTANCE USE. LDS doctrine prohibits the use of alcohol, tobacco, and other addictive drugs. Among adults and adolescents, usage rates are considerably lower among Latter-day Saints than among other religious groups. Only 28 percent of adult Latter-day Saints say they drink alcohol, compared with 65 percent of Protestants, 85 percent of Catholics, and 86 percent of Jews. Fourteen percent say they smoke tobacco, compared with 36 percent of Protestants, 38 percent of Catholics, and 28 percent of Jews.

The NIDA survey of substance use among high school seniors reveals substantial differences between Latter-day Saints and other religious groups. About 33 percent of LDS high school seniors said they had used alcohol within the previous thirty days, compared to 62 percent of Protestants and 75 percent of Catholics. The percentage of LDS seniors who smoke is half as large as among the other religious groups—14 percent among LDS, 28 percent among Protestants, and 32 percent among Catholics. The differences for marijuana are not as large, but are still lower for LDS students. For example, 14 percent of LDS seniors had used marijuana during the past month, compared to 22 percent among Protestants and 25 percent among Catholics. LDS students also have low rates of cocaine use. Five percent had used cocaine during the past month, compared to 5 percent among Protestants, 7 percent among Catholics, and 8 percent among Jews.(See Abuse of Drugs)

So, looking at these figures, it looks like LDS is a gateway religion which could lead to the use of harder religions like Catholicism.

 

[Cotton-eyed Hoe]

Following is my analysis of what would have happened in 2012 if a frog had wings.

:lol:

 

[grizindabox]

I have a relative that lives in Southern Idaho and what he told me about his Mormon fishing buddies...you always invite 2, so they can keep an eye on each other...if you only invite 1, he will drink all your beer.

 

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

isn't there a three strikes policy for failed m.j. tests? hard to believe harper failed that many in the short time he was here.

anyone confirm that samson k is gone?

Harper's departure had nothing to do with any drug test. Jeez, he's LDS. He probably doesn't even drink.

The only thing you are right on is that it wasn't a drug test.

LDS has no barring on anything, SLUT is the porn capital of the world. He never got a third strike........

 

[grizcountry420]

isn't there a three strikes policy for failed m.j. tests? hard to believe harper failed that many in the short time he was here.

anyone confirm that samson k is gone?

Harper's departure had nothing to do with any drug test. Jeez, he's LDS. He probably doesn't even drink.

The only thing you are right on is that it wasn't a drug test.

LDS has no barring on anything, SLUT is the porn capital of the world. He never got a third strike........

You've obviously never played the game. I can tell that you're a loser!!


- PlayerRape

 

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

isn't there a three strikes policy for failed m.j. tests? hard to believe harper failed that many in the short time he was here.

anyone confirm that samson k is gone?

Harper's departure had nothing to do with any drug test. Jeez, he's LDS. He probably doesn't even drink.

The only thing you are right on is that it wasn't a drug test.

LDS has no barring on anything, SLUT is the porn capital of the world. He never got a third strike........

You've obviously never played the game. I can tell that you're a loser!!


- PlayerRape

He's dishonest, his posts, his PMs and his lies.

That's why I just don't give a fu*k what the butthole kisser says.

 

[PlayerRep]

Once again, Alpha (and his totally dumbass sidekick 420) prove that they don't have a clue, don't know what they're talking about, and are willing defame a kid (without having any information). Get the F out of here with your incorrect, lying and defamatory stuff. If you want to take me on with this, name your price for a bet.

 

[poorgriz]

Let me guess. Because some lawyer probably got him off on the charges, it's all good, no harm no foul? That seems to be the usual PR stance.

 

[nzone]

Let me guess. Because some lawyer probably got him off on the charges, it's all good, no harm no foul? That seems to be the usual PR stance.

I believe you are confusing Harper with Roderick. But please carry on with this nonsense. It passes a few minutes of my day

 

[CDAGRIZ]

Let me guess. Because some lawyer probably got him off on the charges, it's all good, no harm no foul? That seems to be the usual PR stance.

That is one way to make a mess of the charging documents.

 

[EverettGriz]

Let me guess. Because some lawyer probably got him off on the charges, it's all good, no harm no foul? That seems to be the usual PR stance.

That is one way to make a mess of the charging documents.

Ha!!

 

[NativeGriz]

Let me guess. Because some lawyer probably got him off on the charges, it's all good, no harm no foul? That seems to be the usual PR stance.

I have no clue whom you are referring to, but if it has anything to do with Kemp or TJ, those charges should have never happened. Over zealous police that need to be sued. Unfortunately it lead to a lot of UM's problems. RE sucked at dealing with this properly, but that is another story.

 

[getgrizzy]

Let me guess. Because some lawyer probably got him off on the charges, it's all good, no harm no foul? That seems to be the usual PR stance.

I have no clue whom you are referring to, but if it has anything to do with Kemp or TJ, those charges should have never happened. Over zealous police that need to be sued. Unfortunately it lead to a lot of UM's problems. RE sucked at dealing with this properly, but that is another story.

the only people being over zealous were kemp and t.j. by keeping the party going after the cops kept coming back and telling them to shut it down. there was nothing to discuss and the police did nothing to provoke the incident. kemp and t.j. agitated the police and the action wasn't over zealous on the cops part.

as for harper i've seen nor heard nothing about his being involved in a marijuana charge. never heard anything about a failed drug test either.

 

[argh!]

Let me guess. Because some lawyer probably got him off on the charges, it's all good, no harm no foul? That seems to be the usual PR stance.

That is one way to make a mess of the charging documents.

so now egriz has turned in to a greenie fantasy site?

 

[NativeGriz]

Let me guess. Because some lawyer probably got him off on the charges, it's all good, no harm no foul? That seems to be the usual PR stance.

I have no clue whom you are referring to, but if it has anything to do with Kemp or TJ, those charges should have never happened. Over zealous police that need to be sued. Unfortunately it lead to a lot of UM's problems. RE sucked at dealing with this properly, but that is another story.

the only people being over zealous were kemp and t.j. by keeping the party going after the cops kept coming back and telling them to shut it down. there was nothing to discuss and the police did nothing to provoke the incident. kemp and t.j. agitated the police and the action wasn't over zealous on the cops part.

as for harper i've seen nor heard nothing about his being involved in a marijuana charge. never heard anything about a failed drug test either.

Why did the police reduce the charges so significantly the next day. Could it be witnesses with video phones paint a different picture.

 

[tnt]

Let me guess. Because some lawyer probably got him off on the charges, it's all good, no harm no foul? That seems to be the usual PR stance.

I have no clue whom you are referring to, but if it has anything to do with Kemp or TJ, those charges should have never happened. Over zealous police that need to be sued. Unfortunately it lead to a lot of UM's problems. RE sucked at dealing with this properly, but that is another story.

the only people being over zealous were kemp and t.j. by keeping the party going after the cops kept coming back and telling them to shut it down. there was nothing to discuss and the police did nothing to provoke the incident. kemp and t.j. agitated the police and the action wasn't over zealous on the cops part.

as for harper i've seen nor heard nothing about his being involved in a marijuana charge. never heard anything about a failed drug test either.

Why did the police reduce the charges so significantly the next day. Could it be witnesses with video phones paint a different picture.

Next Day??? Nothing happened until conveniently AFTER the playoffs. BTW the police don't make "charges" We are still waiting for the huge fee contingent law suit Miltys team is bringing . The reason according to PR they took the case at reduced fees when Jim Foley marched them in the next day. Something he did for every student in trouble as did milts firm (another part of the "problems" If only that suit had happened the NCAA would have lefty town empty handed. But alas it did not.

 

[Raider]

Let me guess. Because some lawyer probably got him off on the charges, it's all good, no harm no foul? That seems to be the usual PR stance.

I have no clue whom you are referring to, but if it has anything to do with Kemp or TJ, those charges should have never happened. Over zealous police that need to be sued. Unfortunately it lead to a lot of UM's problems. RE sucked at dealing with this properly, but that is another story.

the only people being over zealous were kemp and t.j. by keeping the party going after the cops kept coming back and telling them to shut it down. there was nothing to discuss and the police did nothing to provoke the incident. kemp and t.j. agitated the police and the action wasn't over zealous on the cops part.

You just flat ass made this up.

I know you are bound and determined to carry this torch, but at least get your facts straight.