grizfromhel
Well-known member
Today's Wall Street Journal editorial page has an interesting article comparing the two most notorious college sports "incidents" in the last ten years, namely Penn State and the matter of the three accused white boys from the Duke lacrosse team. Recall that at Duke there was an immediate "rush to judgment" and even, in that citadel of liberalism, an academic witch hunt in which 88 faculty members of the university signed a published newspaper ad (paid by the university, incidentally) denouncing the lacrosse players and expressing support and sympathy for the supposed victim. A month later the case had fallen apart and the untruthfulness of the allegations were exposed: a big,flat out lie.
I do not mean to suggest or express an opinion about whether JJ or his accuser is telling the truth----I'll leave that to an impartial panel, wherever that may be found. But the "rush to judgment" atmosphere of the administration and certain parts of the faculty at UM --- ready to form a judgment and condemn on sparse and second-hand information--- is very similar to the affair at Duke. And, as I recall, the lacrosse players ended up with a substantial settlement from the college. At least it wasn't the taxpayer's money (yours and mine) as JJ's could be.
I do not mean to suggest or express an opinion about whether JJ or his accuser is telling the truth----I'll leave that to an impartial panel, wherever that may be found. But the "rush to judgment" atmosphere of the administration and certain parts of the faculty at UM --- ready to form a judgment and condemn on sparse and second-hand information--- is very similar to the affair at Duke. And, as I recall, the lacrosse players ended up with a substantial settlement from the college. At least it wasn't the taxpayer's money (yours and mine) as JJ's could be.