• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

JJ Trial

spokaneman said:
Jerry Punch said:
My point is that it is as easy to put the alleged victim on trial. She understood the risks and events that would happen after the formal accusation was made. It is easy to accuse someone of rape but with that comes the great weight of being accused of a variety of things that may or may not be true. We've heard lots of them on this board.

You just summed up my entire point... Having 2 daughters, I can only pray to my God that they never have to be faced with the decision of filing rape charges full knowing that the egriz community (or similar) will vilify her for it, or let the guy off and not face the wrath that is Jerry Punch....

All you turds are doing is making it easier for the NEXT REAL RAPIST to continue his work... as what girl in her right mind would subject herself to the ridicule of JBS if she decides to press charges??....

You guys are making it increasingly difficult for 1 in 4 daughters everywhere to stand up and press charges...
oh, my.............
 
I peeked ahead.

Next week's word is actually "dumbf*ck".

Not a particularly flattering photo, though, spokaneman. Bad hair day?
 
spokaneman said:
firmgriz said:
spokaneman and JP - I've got a radical idea for both of you to consider. Let's just assume for a moment that JJ didn't actually do anything wrong, that perhaps he just might be innocent. For sake of argument, let's just call it a presumption of innocence. I know, it's a crazy idea, but if you think about it long enough it may just start making sense and then most if not all of your posts start looking pretty silly when viewed from that radical position.

Just some food for thought for you two and flower girl.

Does the "presumption of innocence" mandate that the "victim" and all her associates be gutted on a public chat site?
Yes, it is going to be gutted in court anyway. Why do you think sports message boards are held to such a high standard? #dumbass
 
kemajic said:
Jerry Punch said:
TxGriz said:
spokaneman said:
You just summed up my entire point... Having 2 daughters, I can only pray to my God that they never have to be faced with the decision of filing rape charges full knowing that the egriz community (or similar) will vilify her for it, or let the guy off and not face the wrath that is Jerry Punch....

All you turds are doing is making it easier for the NEXT REAL RAPIST to continue his work... as what girl in her right mind would subject herself to the ridicule of JBS if she decides to press charges??....

You guys are making it increasingly difficult for 1 in 4 daughters everywhere to stand up and press charges...

The pussification of America.

Thank God the dumbasses in your dumb hick state don't run the country anymore.
I'm not thanking anyone, including God, for whom is currently running the country.

I don't know about that. My portfolio is doing a hell of a lot better than when the Texas Dumbass left office.
 
spokaneman said:
firmgriz said:
spokaneman and JP - I've got a radical idea for both of you to consider. Let's just assume for a moment that JJ didn't actually do anything wrong, that perhaps he just might be innocent. For sake of argument, let's just call it a presumption of innocence. I know, it's a crazy idea, but if you think about it long enough it may just start making sense and then most if not all of your posts start looking pretty silly when viewed from that radical position.

Just some food for thought for you two and flower girl.

Does the "presumption of innocence" mandate that the "victim" and all her associates be gutted on a public chat site?

Have you been writing for the Missoulian? I didn't realize the jury had reached a verdict and deemed Jane Doe a victim of a crime. Perhaps it's just wishful thinking on your behalf.
 
JBS said:
spokaneman said:
firmgriz said:
spokaneman and JP - I've got a radical idea for both of you to consider. Let's just assume for a moment that JJ didn't actually do anything wrong, that perhaps he just might be innocent. For sake of argument, let's just call it a presumption of innocence. I know, it's a crazy idea, but if you think about it long enough it may just start making sense and then most if not all of your posts start looking pretty silly when viewed from that radical position.

Just some food for thought for you two and flower girl.

Does the "presumption of innocence" mandate that the "victim" and all her associates be gutted on a public chat site?
Yes, it is going to be gutted in court anyway. Why do you think sports message boards are held to such a high standard? #dumbass


Really?.. I have yet to see slut, whore, c%*t, and the fact that she was "begging for it" show up in the court transcripts.... silly me!!
 
grizatwork said:
spokaneman said:
Jerry Punch said:
My point is that it is as easy to put the alleged victim on trial. She understood the risks and events that would happen after the formal accusation was made. It is easy to accuse someone of rape but with that comes the great weight of being accused of a variety of things that may or may not be true. We've heard lots of them on this board.

You just summed up my entire point... Having 2 daughters, I can only pray to my God that they never have to be faced with the decision of filing rape charges full knowing that the egriz community (or similar) will vilify her for it, or let the guy off and not face the wrath that is Jerry Punch....

All you turds are doing is making it easier for the NEXT REAL RAPIST to continue his work... as what girl in her right mind would subject herself to the ridicule of JBS if she decides to press charges??....

You guys are making it increasingly difficult for 1 in 4 daughters everywhere to stand up and press charges...

Hyperbole much? Having a daughter myself, I would probably have a hard time letting justice run it's course if she were sexually assaulted. I am not going to make any statements in regards to guilt or innocence. Both me and my wife have stated that if our daughter came to us with this current scenario then we would be having a serious come to Jesus moment with her and point out her role in the situation and that we would not be comfortable with her going forward with a case based on what we know so far.

I am not in favor of exposing her identity or vilifying her or demonizing her or attacking her in any way. I am only speaking what we would do in the same situation.
If your daughter felt so comfortable with you and your wife, I have to congratulate you for raising that girl very well. Sadly, most girls would not, in average circumstances, given these circumstances, be so forthcoming to their parents. I'm not sure my daughters would feel that way, but I doubt seriously if they would be in that vulnerable a spot...one in particular would have decked the attacker and grabbed her mace.
 
spokaneman said:
EverettGriz said:
spokaneman said:
EverettGriz said:
Good God, you are the king of hyperbole.

:clap: :clap: This is the 4th time this week that you used a form of "hyperbole"....

That word of the week calendar is really working out for ya.... I have never seen one, but heard that a 52 week "Word of the Week Calendar" was made for those too stupid for the actual larger Word of the Day calendar...

Don't worry my dumb little buddy... keep up the good work and soon you can graduate to the big boy calendar...


And each and every time I used it to describe you.

Huh.

As the old saying goes, the first time someone calls you an ass, ignore 'em. The second time someone calls you an ass, consider it. The third time, stock up on toilet paper.

Well, for you, it's lucky 4....

I just cannot wait to see what next weeks word is....c'mon, turn the page and tell us... I hope it is "defamation"....
I can't wait either. Breaking it out now. #dumbfuck
 
Jerry Punch said:
kemajic said:
Jerry Punch said:
TxGriz said:
The pussification of America.

Thank God the dumbasses in your dumb hick state don't run the country anymore.
I'm not thanking anyone, including God, for whom is currently running the country.

I don't know about that. My portfolio is doing a hell of a lot better than when the Texas Dumbass left office.
Thank Boehner for that.
 
spokaneman said:
JBS said:
spokaneman said:
firmgriz said:
spokaneman and JP - I've got a radical idea for both of you to consider. Let's just assume for a moment that JJ didn't actually do anything wrong, that perhaps he just might be innocent. For sake of argument, let's just call it a presumption of innocence. I know, it's a crazy idea, but if you think about it long enough it may just start making sense and then most if not all of your posts start looking pretty silly when viewed from that radical position.

Just some food for thought for you two and flower girl.

Does the "presumption of innocence" mandate that the "victim" and all her associates be gutted on a public chat site?
Yes, it is going to be gutted in court anyway. Why do you think sports message boards are held to such a high standard? #dumbass


Really?.. I have yet to see slut, whore, c%*t, and the fact that she was "begging for it" show up in the court transcripts.... silly me!!
#dumbassonatamponrug
 
grizfnz said:
spokaneman said:
firmgriz said:
spokaneman and JP - I've got a radical idea for both of you to consider. Let's just assume for a moment that JJ didn't actually do anything wrong, that perhaps he just might be innocent. For sake of argument, let's just call it a presumption of innocence. I know, it's a crazy idea, but if you think about it long enough it may just start making sense and then most if not all of your posts start looking pretty silly when viewed from that radical position.

Just some food for thought for you two and flower girl.

Does the "presumption of innocence" mandate that the "victim" and all her associates be gutted on a public chat site?

Have you been writing for the Missoulian? I didn't realize the jury had reached a verdict and deemed Jane Doe a victim of a crime. Perhaps it's just wishful thinking on your behalf.

I know that "school" was hard for you UM "graduates", and I know that you are "smarter" than you lead on, but do you really not know why I put "." around "Victim"??....
 
@Spokaneman: Let's, just for the sake of argument, imagine that everyone here saw the light and admitted the error of their ways, self-flagellated then apologized and said you were right. I believe you would think that you would have made the world better for the actual (not alleged) victims of rape. Right?
 
kemajic said:
Jerry Punch said:
kemajic said:
Jerry Punch said:
Thank God the dumbasses in your dumb hick state don't run the country anymore.
I'm not thanking anyone, including God, for whom is currently running the country.

I don't know about that. My portfolio is doing a hell of a lot better than when the Texas Dumbass left office.
Thank Boehner for that.
Sarcasm..very good..
 
spokaneman said:
grizfnz said:
spokaneman said:
firmgriz said:
spokaneman and JP - I've got a radical idea for both of you to consider. Let's just assume for a moment that JJ didn't actually do anything wrong, that perhaps he just might be innocent. For sake of argument, let's just call it a presumption of innocence. I know, it's a crazy idea, but if you think about it long enough it may just start making sense and then most if not all of your posts start looking pretty silly when viewed from that radical position.

Just some food for thought for you two and flower girl.

Does the "presumption of innocence" mandate that the "victim" and all her associates be gutted on a public chat site?

Have you been writing for the Missoulian? I didn't realize the jury had reached a verdict and deemed Jane Doe a victim of a crime. Perhaps it's just wishful thinking on your behalf.

I know that "school" was hard for you UM "graduates", and I know that you are "smarter" than you lead on, but do you really not know why I put "." around "Victim"??....
Ha? Is EWU really a school? Check up on it, baby, direction schools are meaningless and a lot of folks don't want to be associated with your sorry ass. You should actually be thanking UM. #dumbass
 
grizfnz said:
No DNA testing done on the blanket that was turned in 3 weeks after the fact :shock:

[youtube]http://youtu.be/b266NeGU15I[/youtube]
that they admit to having had sex makes the blanket issue moot...sounds like filler for prime time...
 
Speaker Boner has done nothing but obstruct. I'll thank stablizing health care costs and declining unemployment as main factors. The successful direction the country is going must really make a number of you butt hurt, doesn't it, Kem? Alas, I digress.
 
GrizLA said:
grizfnz said:
No DNA testing done on the blanket that was turned in 3 weeks after the fact :shock:

[youtube]http://youtu.be/b266NeGU15I[/youtube]
that they admit to having had sex makes the blanket issue moot...sounds like filler for prime time...
Other than the councilor yesterday, I think the testimony has been meaningless. Just put JJ up there and end the thing.
 
Back
Top