Is anybody else...

[Mavman]

Sorry but to say the team hasn't proven they can go on the road and win a game they should win when they did the previous week is a failure of 3rd grade level logic, especially coming from someone "who played the game". It isn't proof that they can consistently do it, the way good teams do -- but I haven't seen anyone yet make that claim. The fact that they won is a perfectly valid reason to be optimistic that they can do it again. I think that is where a lot of -- if not the majority of -- Griz fans are at the moment, optimistic. Relax. We get to find out next Saturday where the Griz are in their progress to "consistently winning on the road". BTW - When they win again I realize that at least one brainiac in this forum will claim that winning two games in a row on the road won't in any way suggest consistency in spite of the fact that no one will claim it does.

As I said, I didn’t go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU, so it didn’t show that this team should win the games it should on the road. Winning really tough games on the road is a different category. Talk about not understanding logic. Jeez, did you get through third grade?

So is Isu a game the Griz should win? Psu was a game they shouldn't win but did win? So the griz showed they can win on the road in games they shouldn't win against PSU but showed they couldn't win games they shouldn't win against Washington? So we are waiting to see if the Griz can win games on the road they should win? Asking for a third grader!

 

[Htowngriz]

Sorry but to say the team hasn't proven they can go on the road and win a game they should win when they did the previous week is a failure of 3rd grade level logic, especially coming from someone "who played the game". It isn't proof that they can consistently do it, the way good teams do -- but I haven't seen anyone yet make that claim. The fact that they won is a perfectly valid reason to be optimistic that they can do it again. I think that is where a lot of -- if not the majority of -- Griz fans are at the moment, optimistic. Relax. We get to find out next Saturday where the Griz are in their progress to "consistently winning on the road". BTW - When they win again I realize that at least one brainiac in this forum will claim that winning two games in a row on the road won't in any way suggest consistency in spite of the fact that no one will claim it does.

As I said, I didn’t go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU, so it didn’t show that this team should win the games it should on the road. Winning really tough games on the road is a different category. Talk about not understanding logic. Jeez, did you get through third grade?

So is Isu a game the Griz should win? Psu was a game they shouldn't win but did win? So the griz showed they can win on the road in games they shouldn't win against PSU but showed they couldn't win games they shouldn't win against Washington? So we are waiting to see if the Griz can win games on the road they should win? Asking for a third grader!

#lawyered

 

[grizfan406]

As good of a win I thought the PSU game was: PSU competed well in FBS matchups, was coming off a bye, was at home... and all that... The only facet of the game we seem competent is offense. Defense and special teams be damned. This is not sustainable. When we go against Weber we will need all facets to be top notch. I think we can beat ISU with what we have now but we need to get better on D and ST fast.

 

[Grisly Fan]

As good of a win I thought the PSU game was: PSU competed well in FBS matchups, was coming off a bye, was at home... and all that... The only facet of the game we seem competent is offense. Defense and special teams be damned. This is not sustainable. When we go against Weber we will need all facets to be top notch. I think we can beat ISU with what we have now but we need to get better on D and ST fast.

Spot on. Thing is, kick coverage is really not all that difficult. Most teams are at least mediocre at it. If the Griz can at least get to that point it would be a HUGE improvement. I'd like to say that I believe they can pretty quickly. We'll see.

 

[Htowngriz]

As good of a win I thought the PSU game was: PSU competed well in FBS matchups, was coming off a bye, was at home... and all that... The only facet of the game we seem competent is offense. Defense and special teams be damned. This is not sustainable. When we go against Weber we will need all facets to be top notch. I think we can beat ISU with what we have now but we need to get better on D and ST fast.

Spot on. Thing is, kick coverage is really not all that difficult. Most teams are at least mediocre at it. If the Griz can at least get to that point it would be a HUGE improvement. I'd like to say that I believe they can pretty quickly. We'll see.

Well the Griz have done a great job of making it LOOK difficult so far. :lol:

 

[kemajic]

As good of a win I thought the PSU game was: PSU competed well in FBS matchups, was coming off a bye, was at home... and all that... The only facet of the game we seem competent is offense. Defense and special teams be damned. This is not sustainable. When we go against Weber we will need all facets to be top notch. I think we can beat ISU with what we have now but we need to get better on D and ST fast.

Spot on. Thing is, kick coverage is really not all that difficult. Most teams are at least mediocre at it. If the Griz can at least get to that point it would be a HUGE improvement. I'd like to say that I believe they can pretty quickly. We'll see.

Well the Griz have done a great job of making it LOOK difficult so far. :lol:

We don't make the coverage look difficult when we're returning it. Not sure I've seen a block yet. Has never been a Stitt priority.

 

[debellatio]

As good of a win I thought the PSU game was: PSU competed well in FBS matchups, was coming off a bye, was at home... and all that... The only facet of the game we seem competent is offense. Defense and special teams be damned. This is not sustainable. When we go against Weber we will need all facets to be top notch. I think we can beat ISU with what we have now but we need to get better on D and ST fast.

Spot on. Thing is, kick coverage is really not all that difficult. Most teams are at least mediocre at it. If the Griz can at least get to that point it would be a HUGE improvement. I'd like to say that I believe they can pretty quickly. We'll see.

When the returner catches the ball between the 5 and 15 yard line it is easy to get a good return. Ever since the first game Williams leg has seemed to loose strength in both punting and kicking. He did awesome in the Valpo game.

 

[PlayerRep]

Sorry but to say the team hasn't proven they can go on the road and win a game they should win when they did the previous week is a failure of 3rd grade level logic, especially coming from someone "who played the game". It isn't proof that they can consistently do it, the way good teams do -- but I haven't seen anyone yet make that claim. The fact that they won is a perfectly valid reason to be optimistic that they can do it again. I think that is where a lot of -- if not the majority of -- Griz fans are at the moment, optimistic. Relax. We get to find out next Saturday where the Griz are in their progress to "consistently winning on the road". BTW - When they win again I realize that at least one brainiac in this forum will claim that winning two games in a row on the road won't in any way suggest consistency in spite of the fact that no one will claim it does.

As I said, I didn’t go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU, so it didn’t show that this team should win the games it should on the road. Winning really tough games on the road is a different category. Talk about not understanding logic. Jeez, did you get through third grade?

So is Isu a game the Griz should win? Psu was a game they shouldn't win but did win? So the griz showed they can win on the road in games they shouldn't win against PSU but showed they couldn't win games they shouldn't win against Washington? So we are waiting to see if the Griz can win games on the road they should win? Asking for a third grader!

This is what I saw earlier. Note the plural word "games".

"The team this year, and past Stitt teams, haven't shown that they can go on the road and win the games they should win."

Do you think the PSU erases this history too:

"Montana hadn't beaten a conference team since Nov. 5, 2016. Montana hadn't won a road game since Sept. 10, 2016 or beaten a conference team on the road since Nov. 21, 2015."

If you think that beating PSU on the road shows that Stitt's team this year, and Stitt's past teams, can in fact win gameS on the road--and that the stat record above is now erased and forgotten, you are welcome to your opinion. Like I said, a good start with the PSU win. One win does not make a trend, in my view, and while I think each remaining game is winnable, that doesn't mean I think, based on PSU or otherwise, that the Griz will all remaining games, including all road games.

I think it's funny that so many of you base so much on one game. We win game and we're going to the national championship. We lose the game, and the coach and DC should be fired. An absolute sign of someone who never played the game and doesn't understand the game, in my view--or a third grader.

 

[Grisly Fan]

As good of a win I thought the PSU game was: PSU competed well in FBS matchups, was coming off a bye, was at home... and all that... The only facet of the game we seem competent is offense. Defense and special teams be damned. This is not sustainable. When we go against Weber we will need all facets to be top notch. I think we can beat ISU with what we have now but we need to get better on D and ST fast.

Spot on. Thing is, kick coverage is really not all that difficult. Most teams are at least mediocre at it. If the Griz can at least get to that point it would be a HUGE improvement. I'd like to say that I believe they can pretty quickly. We'll see.

When the returner catches the ball between the 5 and 15 yard line it is easy to get a good return. Ever since the first game Williams leg has seemed to loose strength in both punting and kicking. He did awesome in the Valpo game.

I wouldn't necessarily say short kicks are easy to return. BH's teams were generally known to be excellent on special teams and the kickers of the day certainly didn't put all of their kicks in the endzone or even inside the 5. In fact shorter kicks can be easier to cover than long kicks if the kick has height. The killer is a low relatively short kick to the middle of the field. All options are open to the returner. OTOH our returners, no matter where the kick lands, seem to run to the first level of tacklers and stop. Maybe we can convince other teams to do the same?

 

[Mousegriz]

Sorry but to say the team hasn't proven they can go on the road and win a game they should win when they did the previous week is a failure of 3rd grade level logic, especially coming from someone "who played the game". It isn't proof that they can consistently do it, the way good teams do -- but I haven't seen anyone yet make that claim. The fact that they won is a perfectly valid reason to be optimistic that they can do it again. I think that is where a lot of -- if not the majority of -- Griz fans are at the moment, optimistic. Relax. We get to find out next Saturday where the Griz are in their progress to "consistently winning on the road". BTW - When they win again I realize that at least one brainiac in this forum will claim that winning two games in a row on the road won't in any way suggest consistency in spite of the fact that no one will claim it does.

As I said, I didn’t go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU, so it didn’t show that this team should win the games it should on the road. Winning really tough games on the road is a different category. Talk about not understanding logic. Jeez, did you get through third grade?

So is Isu a game the Griz should win? Psu was a game they shouldn't win but did win? So the griz showed they can win on the road in games they shouldn't win against PSU but showed they couldn't win games they shouldn't win against Washington? So we are waiting to see if the Griz can win games on the road they should win? Asking for a third grader!

PR never learned to proof a sentence in the 3rd grade so he usually leaves out several key words that make many of his responses look like a guy who never made it through the 3rd grade. Then he jumps the guy who points that out. He "didn't go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU".....which to me says he went into it thinking Griz shouldn't win it. Then they won proving they could win a game he didn't think they should. But from that draws the conclusion that they still haven't proven they can win a game he thinks they should. Seems a team PR thinks Griz shouldn't beat must be tougher than one he does.

Another observation.....I didn't see PR "go into the game"....but if he had PSU would have kicked the Griz' asses!!

Proof it old guy or you look pretty silly! I think you meant to say "I didn't go into the game thinking the Griz couldn't (shouldn't) win at PSU"...then the rest of your blabber makes a little more sense.

This week vs. ISU should be tougher than last and even I am not sure if Griz have proven they can win tougher games on the road.

 

[jodcon]

As good of a win I thought the PSU game was: PSU competed well in FBS matchups, was coming off a bye, was at home... and all that... The only facet of the game we seem competent is offense. Defense and special teams be damned. This is not sustainable. When we go against Weber we will need all facets to be top notch. I think we can beat ISU with what we have now but we need to get better on D and ST fast.

Spot on. Thing is, kick coverage is really not all that difficult. Most teams are at least mediocre at it. If the Griz can at least get to that point it would be a HUGE improvement. I'd like to say that I believe they can pretty quickly. We'll see.

Well the Griz have done a great job of making it LOOK difficult so far. :lol:

We don't make the coverage look difficult when we're returning it. Not sure I've seen a block yet. Has never been a Stitt priority.

Blocking leads to injuries Kem, heard it firsthand in Seeley Lake.

Quit trying to hurt our kids.

 

[Mavman]

Sorry but to say the team hasn't proven they can go on the road and win a game they should win when they did the previous week is a failure of 3rd grade level logic, especially coming from someone "who played the game". It isn't proof that they can consistently do it, the way good teams do -- but I haven't seen anyone yet make that claim. The fact that they won is a perfectly valid reason to be optimistic that they can do it again. I think that is where a lot of -- if not the majority of -- Griz fans are at the moment, optimistic. Relax. We get to find out next Saturday where the Griz are in their progress to "consistently winning on the road". BTW - When they win again I realize that at least one brainiac in this forum will claim that winning two games in a row on the road won't in any way suggest consistency in spite of the fact that no one will claim it does.

As I said, I didn’t go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU, so it didn’t show that this team should win the games it should on the road. Winning really tough games on the road is a different category. Talk about not understanding logic. Jeez, did you get through third grade?

So is Isu a game the Griz should win? Psu was a game they shouldn't win but did win? So the griz showed they can win on the road in games they shouldn't win against PSU but showed they couldn't win games they shouldn't win against Washington? So we are waiting to see if the Griz can win games on the road they should win? Asking for a third grader!

This is what I saw earlier. Note the plural word "games".

"The team this year, and past Stitt teams, haven't shown that they can go on the road and win the games they should win."

Do you think the PSU erases this history too:

"Montana hadn't beaten a conference team since Nov. 5, 2016. Montana hadn't won a road game since Sept. 10, 2016 or beaten a conference team on the road since Nov. 21, 2015."

If you think that beating PSU on the road shows that Stitt's team this year, and Stitt's past teams, can in fact win gameS on the road--and that the stat record above is now erased and forgotten, you are welcome to your opinion. Like I said, a good start with the PSU win. One win does not make a trend, in my view, and while I think each remaining game is winnable, that doesn't mean I think, based on PSU or otherwise, that the Griz will all remaining games, including all road games.

I think it's funny that so many of you base so much on one game. We win game and we're going to the national championship. We lose the game, and the coach and DC should be fired. An absolute sign of someone who never played the game and doesn't understand the game, in my view--or a third grader.

No i think the Griz play like shit on the road going back Pre Stitt and that includes some wins they have had. Psu was a nice win, don't prove anything though, Uni was a nice win last year, year one Msu was a nice win. I also think your post was funny AF so I had fun with it.

 

[PlayerRep]

Sorry but to say the team hasn't proven they can go on the road and win a game they should win when they did the previous week is a failure of 3rd grade level logic, especially coming from someone "who played the game". It isn't proof that they can consistently do it, the way good teams do -- but I haven't seen anyone yet make that claim. The fact that they won is a perfectly valid reason to be optimistic that they can do it again. I think that is where a lot of -- if not the majority of -- Griz fans are at the moment, optimistic. Relax. We get to find out next Saturday where the Griz are in their progress to "consistently winning on the road". BTW - When they win again I realize that at least one brainiac in this forum will claim that winning two games in a row on the road won't in any way suggest consistency in spite of the fact that no one will claim it does.

As I said, I didn’t go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU, so it didn’t show that this team should win the games it should on the road. Winning really tough games on the road is a different category. Talk about not understanding logic. Jeez, did you get through third grade?

So is Isu a game the Griz should win? Psu was a game they shouldn't win but did win? So the griz showed they can win on the road in games they shouldn't win against PSU but showed they couldn't win games they shouldn't win against Washington? So we are waiting to see if the Griz can win games on the road they should win? Asking for a third grader!

PR never learned to proof a sentence in the 3rd grade so he usually leaves out several key words that make many of his responses look like a guy who never made it through the 3rd grade. Then he jumps the guy who points that out. He "didn't go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU".....which to me says he went into it thinking Griz shouldn't win it. Then they won proving they could win a game he didn't think they should. But from that draws the conclusion that they still haven't proven they can win a game he thinks they should. Seems a team PR thinks Griz shouldn't beat must be tougher than one he does.

Another observation.....I didn't see PR "go into the game"....but if he had PSU would have kicked the Griz' asses!!

Proof it old guy or you look pretty silly! I think you meant to say "I didn't go into the game thinking the Griz couldn't (shouldn't) win at PSU"...then the rest of your blabber makes a little more sense.

This week vs. ISU should be tougher than last and even I am not sure if Griz have proven they can win tougher games on the road.

Are you the guy with the son who was a benchwarmer at a little college in basketball, like yourself? If so, how's he doing? In fact, how are you doing? Your jealously keeps showing through.
Have you ever achieved anything? Just curious. I know you don't have a clue about football.

 

[PlayerRep]

As I said, I didn’t go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU, so it didn’t show that this team should win the games it should on the road. Winning really tough games on the road is a different category. Talk about not understanding logic. Jeez, did you get through third grade?

So is Isu a game the Griz should win? Psu was a game they shouldn't win but did win? So the griz showed they can win on the road in games they shouldn't win against PSU but showed they couldn't win games they shouldn't win against Washington? So we are waiting to see if the Griz can win games on the road they should win? Asking for a third grader!

This is what I saw earlier. Note the plural word "games".

"The team this year, and past Stitt teams, haven't shown that they can go on the road and win the games they should win."

Do you think the PSU erases this history too:

"Montana hadn't beaten a conference team since Nov. 5, 2016. Montana hadn't won a road game since Sept. 10, 2016 or beaten a conference team on the road since Nov. 21, 2015."

If you think that beating PSU on the road shows that Stitt's team this year, and Stitt's past teams, can in fact win gameS on the road--and that the stat record above is now erased and forgotten, you are welcome to your opinion. Like I said, a good start with the PSU win. One win does not make a trend, in my view, and while I think each remaining game is winnable, that doesn't mean I think, based on PSU or otherwise, that the Griz will all remaining games, including all road games.

I think it's funny that so many of you base so much on one game. We win game and we're going to the national championship. We lose the game, and the coach and DC should be fired. An absolute sign of someone who never played the game and doesn't understand the game, in my view--or a third grader.

No i think the Griz play like shit on the road going back Pre Stitt and that includes some wins they have had. Psu was a nice win, don't prove anything though, Uni was a nice win last year, year one Msu was a nice win. I also think your post was funny AF so I had fun with it.

Thanks for admitting that you actually agree with me. Jeez, what a waste of time.

 

[PlayerRep]

Sorry but to say the team hasn't proven they can go on the road and win a game they should win when they did the previous week is a failure of 3rd grade level logic, especially coming from someone "who played the game". It isn't proof that they can consistently do it, the way good teams do -- but I haven't seen anyone yet make that claim. The fact that they won is a perfectly valid reason to be optimistic that they can do it again. I think that is where a lot of -- if not the majority of -- Griz fans are at the moment, optimistic. Relax. We get to find out next Saturday where the Griz are in their progress to "consistently winning on the road". BTW - When they win again I realize that at least one brainiac in this forum will claim that winning two games in a row on the road won't in any way suggest consistency in spite of the fact that no one will claim it does.

As I said, I didn’t go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU, so it didn’t show that this team should win the games it should on the road. Winning really tough games on the road is a different category. Talk about not understanding logic. Jeez, did you get through third grade?

So is Isu a game the Griz should win? Psu was a game they shouldn't win but did win? So the griz showed they can win on the road in games they shouldn't win against PSU but showed they couldn't win games they shouldn't win against Washington? So we are waiting to see if the Griz can win games on the road they should win? Asking for a third grader!

PR never learned to proof a sentence in the 3rd grade so he usually leaves out several key words that make many of his responses look like a guy who never made it through the 3rd grade. Then he jumps the guy who points that out. He "didn't go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU".....which to me says he went into it thinking Griz shouldn't win it. Then they won proving they could win a game he didn't think they should. But from that draws the conclusion that they still haven't proven they can win a game he thinks they should. Seems a team PR thinks Griz shouldn't beat must be tougher than one he does.

Another observation.....I didn't see PR "go into the game"....but if he had PSU would have kicked the Griz' asses!!

Proof it old guy or you look pretty silly! I think you meant to say "I didn't go into the game thinking the Griz couldn't (shouldn't) win at PSU"...then the rest of your blabber makes a little more sense.

This week vs. ISU should be tougher than last and even I am not sure if Griz have proven they can win tougher games on the road.

Are you proud that the only "game" you bring to the football board is proofreading? Man, you really are worthless. Are you not embarrassed to be pointing out typos on the internet?

 

[PlayerRep]

Sorry but to say the team hasn't proven they can go on the road and win a game they should win when they did the previous week is a failure of 3rd grade level logic, especially coming from someone "who played the game". It isn't proof that they can consistently do it, the way good teams do -- but I haven't seen anyone yet make that claim. The fact that they won is a perfectly valid reason to be optimistic that they can do it again. I think that is where a lot of -- if not the majority of -- Griz fans are at the moment, optimistic. Relax. We get to find out next Saturday where the Griz are in their progress to "consistently winning on the road". BTW - When they win again I realize that at least one brainiac in this forum will claim that winning two games in a row on the road won't in any way suggest consistency in spite of the fact that no one will claim it does.

As I said, I didn’t go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU, so it didn’t show that this team should win the games it should on the road. Winning really tough games on the road is a different category. Talk about not understanding logic. Jeez, did you get through third grade?

So is Isu a game the Griz should win? Psu was a game they shouldn't win but did win? So the griz showed they can win on the road in games they shouldn't win against PSU but showed they couldn't win games they shouldn't win against Washington? So we are waiting to see if the Griz can win games on the road they should win? Asking for a third grader!

PR never learned to proof a sentence in the 3rd grade so he usually leaves out several key words that make many of his responses look like a guy who never made it through the 3rd grade. Then he jumps the guy who points that out. He "didn't go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU".....which to me says he went into it thinking Griz shouldn't win it. Then they won proving they could win a game he didn't think they should. But from that draws the conclusion that they still haven't proven they can win a game he thinks they should. Seems a team PR thinks Griz shouldn't beat must be tougher than one he does.

Another observation.....I didn't see PR "go into the game"....but if he had PSU would have kicked the Griz' asses!!

Proof it old guy or you look pretty silly! I think you meant to say "I didn't go into the game thinking the Griz couldn't (shouldn't) win at PSU"...then the rest of your blabber makes a little more sense.

This week vs. ISU should be tougher than last and even I am not sure if Griz have proven they can win tougher games on the road.

Hey dummy, I said just what I meant to say: "I didn’t go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU." Yes, I went into the game thinking the Griz shouldn't win it. PSU looked like a good team to me. The Griz, maybe not. It was a road game. PSU had kicked UM's butt 2 years ago on the road. Said exactly what I meant to say. Mouse, you really are an idiot.

 

[PlayerRep]

I'm getting dizzy running circles around Mouse and Mav. Why are they unable to read? I think it's a common problem with some posters on this board. Can't read; can't comprehend. And, never played the game. Definitely applies to those 2 jokers.

 

[fanofzoo]

As good of a win I thought the PSU game was: PSU competed well in FBS matchups, was coming off a bye, was at home... and all that... The only facet of the game we seem competent is offense. Defense and special teams be damned. This is not sustainable. When we go against Weber we will need all facets to be top notch. I think we can beat ISU with what we have now but we need to get better on D and ST fast.

Spot on. Thing is, kick coverage is really not all that difficult. Most teams are at least mediocre at it. If the Griz can at least get to that point it would be a HUGE improvement. I'd like to say that I believe they can pretty quickly. We'll see.

Well the Griz have done a great job of making it LOOK difficult so far. :lol:

We don't make the coverage look difficult when we're returning it. Not sure I've seen a block yet. Has never been a Stitt priority.

After how long, what 2 1/2 years, now it's a priority. :idea:

 

[Mavman]

I'm getting dizzy running circles around Mouse and Mav. Why are they unable to read? I think it's a common problem with some posters on this board. Can't read; can't comprehend. And, never played the game. Definitely applies to those 2 jokers.

You never answered my question Jack. Is Isu a game the griz should or shouldn't win?

 

[NendzoneGRIZ]

Sorry but to say the team hasn't proven they can go on the road and win a game they should win when they did the previous week is a failure of 3rd grade level logic, especially coming from someone "who played the game". It isn't proof that they can consistently do it, the way good teams do -- but I haven't seen anyone yet make that claim. The fact that they won is a perfectly valid reason to be optimistic that they can do it again. I think that is where a lot of -- if not the majority of -- Griz fans are at the moment, optimistic. Relax. We get to find out next Saturday where the Griz are in their progress to "consistently winning on the road". BTW - When they win again I realize that at least one brainiac in this forum will claim that winning two games in a row on the road won't in any way suggest consistency in spite of the fact that no one will claim it does.

As I said, I didn’t go into the game thinking the Griz should win at PSU, so it didn’t show that this team should win the games it should on the road. Winning really tough games on the road is a different category. Talk about not understanding logic. Jeez, did you get through third grade?

So is Isu a game the Griz should win? Psu was a game they shouldn't win but did win? So the griz showed they can win on the road in games they shouldn't win against PSU but showed they couldn't win games they shouldn't win against Washington? So we are waiting to see if the Griz can win games on the road they should win? Asking for a third grader!

This is what I saw earlier. Note the plural word "games".

"The team this year, and past Stitt teams, haven't shown that they can go on the road and win the games they should win."

Do you think the PSU erases this history too:

"Montana hadn't beaten a conference team since Nov. 5, 2016. Montana hadn't won a road game since Sept. 10, 2016 or beaten a conference team on the road since Nov. 21, 2015."

If you think that beating PSU on the road shows that Stitt's team this year, and Stitt's past teams, can in fact win gameS on the road--and that the stat record above is now erased and forgotten, you are welcome to your opinion. Like I said, a good start with the PSU win. One win does not make a trend, in my view, and while I think each remaining game is winnable, that doesn't mean I think, based on PSU or otherwise, that the Griz will all remaining games, including all road games.

I think it's funny that so many of you base so much on one game. We win game and we're going to the national championship. We lose the game, and the coach and DC should be fired. An absolute sign of someone who never played the game and doesn't understand the game, in my view--or a third grader.

+1