three-year contracts help us in any number of ways--attracting coaches, giving them security, assuring recruits, et. al.--but they mean little when a big-school raiding-party comes after your up-and-coming young coach. then there's only one issue: bucks.
i'd like to see us get an endowment going for the specific purpose of augmenting coaches's salaries. if a coach (read, krysko, tinkle) is so crucial to the success of a program, why not put a small percentage of every donation to the athletic department toward such a fund. we clearly don't have the big-bucks guys to swoop in and enable us to keep a great coach, but i don't see why the "lay-away" plan wouldn't work.
this is especially crucial for basketball. in football, i doubt we'll keep ambitious young coaches, for the reason we don't play 1-a. there are coaches like players who want to play against the best, and we simply won't be able to keep them at montana.
but in basektball, we do go up against the best, and gonzaga is but one of a host of mid-majors (nevada, creighton, hofstra, wisconsin-milwaukee, utah state) who have proved you can compete against the big guys--provided you have the coach. tinkle is a guy with solid montana roots but if proves to be as good a coach as i think he's going to be, it won't be long before those big programs come calling.
will we be ready?