I've heard a lot of people knocking teams in FCS this year because of weak schedules.
Well take a look at the GPI. It's an objective way of determining how 'strong' a team looks based on their past performance. You can break down schedule as much as you want, but every team has a schedule where you can insinuate whatever you want.
The GPI measures every team on the same criteria.
http://www.collegesportingnews.com/stats/writer/gpi/20121112GPI.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So when MSU is ranked 2nd to 4th in every single ranking that goes into the GPI, they apparently have done more with their schedule than 95% of every other team in FCS.
The same can be said for SHSU. People have been saying they have a soft schedule, but if that was really the case - how are they ranked 2nd to 6th in every single ranking from the GPI?
MSU's schedule (GPI Rankings):
Drake = 67
Chadron = (Similar to Drake based on Massey Ratings)
SFA = 44
UNC = 47
SUU = 29
UCD = 48
EWU = 4
UND = 36
Sac St = 31
PSU = 46
(In regard to Chadron, they are 222nd in Massey, Drake is 224th)
So, MSU's weakest opponent was Drake/Chadron which is top 55% of FCS. Every other opponent is top 40% of FCS. There were definitely stronger schedules that were played by other teams this year, but MSU by no means played a weak schedule.
According to Massey, they have the 28th toughest SOS. (Note there are 122 teams in FCS)