It's speculation about non-football sports.WILDCATFAN said:Check this out, Dont know where the OP heard about this, but what do you guys think?
http://www.mwcboard.com/www/forums/index.php?showtopic=41381
It's speculation about non-football sports.WILDCATFAN said:Check this out, Dont know where the OP heard about this, but what do you guys think?
http://www.mwcboard.com/www/forums/index.php?showtopic=41381
However, the board was refreshing, there were 34 replies and no attempt to hijack the thread. Many actually seemed knowledgeable about the Big Sky schools.kemajic said:It's speculation about non-football sports.WILDCATFAN said:Check this out, Dont know where the OP heard about this, but what do you guys think?
http://www.mwcboard.com/www/forums/index.php?showtopic=41381
dupuyer griz said:However, the board was refreshing, there were 34 replies and no attempt to hijack the thread. Many actually seemed knowledgeable about the Big Sky schools.kemajic said:It's speculation about non-football sports.WILDCATFAN said:Check this out, Dont know where the OP heard about this, but what do you guys think?
http://www.mwcboard.com/www/forums/index.php?showtopic=41381
North
EWU
PSU
Idaho
BSU
Idaho State
Montana
Montana State
Seattle
North Dakota
South
Sac State
Denver
UNC
Weber
SUU
NAU
NMSU
CSUB
UVU
The North (Big Sky?) would cover Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and North Dakota. The South (WAC?) would cover California, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico and Colorado.
Ursa Major said:griz4life said:Who might the other teams be?
Utah Valley State.
Central Washington -- now that Western Washington is long gone.
Western Oregon
San Diego--the only non Big Sky FCS team left in California
Is Saint Mary's bringing football back?
South Dakota and South Dakota State? North Dakota State? Oh wait, I'm just being silly.
I take those statements with a grain of salt. Consider the source. Fullerton has illusions of grandeur and won’t stop until the entire FCS is in the Big Sky. He's like Hitler eyeballin' Poland.
Why? This has nothing to do with football or did you miss that?WSUWALDO said:UVU -- uh, not likely unless they are in a position to add football right away, which I don't think they are.
kemajic said:Why? This has nothing to do with football or did you miss that?WSUWALDO said:UVU -- uh, not likely unless they are in a position to add football right away, which I don't think they are.
WSUWALDO said:kemajic said:Why? This has nothing to do with football or did you miss that?WSUWALDO said:UVU -- uh, not likely unless they are in a position to add football right away, which I don't think they are.
Seriously?!? You think the Big Sky is thinking of adding non-football playing members? If that were the case Denver and Seattle would already be members.
How is this not about football? If you don't have a football team, there is no point to applying. Anyone who thinks the WAC is viable as a non-football playing member is fooooooling themselves. Get over yourself dude and get with the freakin program. You better believe this is about Football. Last I checked the Big Sky conference had 13 football members and 11 all-sport members. You are the supposed (self-proclaimed of course) king of data. I would have thought you knew how to count. Right now the Sky needs another football playing member to get to two divisions, and it is in the Sky's best interest to find an ALL-SPORTS member to bring that number to 12/14. So, yeah, I'm pretty sure this is about football. Only options, IDAHO and New Mexico State. I wouldn't want anyone else, unless it was a team from one of the Dakota's.
If you go to Bruce's Bar I'll get ya a beer for all the insults I've levied at you over the past year.
WILDCATFAN said:THe whole idea of the merger is in reality from a basketball point of view, however, you know that football would be in the back of the Big Sky's mind when or if they invite any more members.
I think Idaho moves thier olympic sports to the Sky, and keeps thier FBS staus via independence and unless someone picks them up, they will return to the Big Sky eventually, they are not BYU or Notre Dame, they do not have the money to survive independence.
And Im not entirely sure I like the idea of a merger, because I have a feeling Weber will be separated from thier traditional rivals.
You can't read. Did you see any mention of BSC football-only members CPSLO and UC Davis? Uh-no. And BSU is included, so in your delusion you think this means football? Uh-no. Is that a Weber education you're sporting?WSUWALDO said:kemajic said:Why? This has nothing to do with football or did you miss that?WSUWALDO said:UVU -- uh, not likely unless they are in a position to add football right away, which I don't think they are.
Seriously?!? You think the Big Sky is thinking of adding non-football playing members? If that were the case Denver and Seattle would already be members.
How is this not about football? If you don't have a football team, there is no point to applying. Anyone who thinks the WAC is viable as a non-football playing member is fooooooling themselves. Get over yourself dude and get with the freakin program. You better believe this is about Football. Last I checked the Big Sky conference had 13 football members and 11 all-sport members. You are the supposed (self-proclaimed of course) king of data. I would have thought you knew how to count. Right now the Sky needs another football playing member to get to two divisions, and it is in the Sky's best interest to find an ALL-SPORTS member to bring that number to 12/14. So, yeah, I'm pretty sure this is about football. Only options, IDAHO and New Mexico State. I wouldn't want anyone else, unless it was a team from one of the Dakota's.
If you go to Bruce's Bar I'll get ya a beer for all the insults I've levied at you over the past year.
kemajic said:You can't read. Did you see any mention of BSC football-only members CPSLO and UC Davis? Uh-no. And BSU is included, so in your delusion you think this means football? Uh-no. Is that a Weber education you're sporting?WSUWALDO said:kemajic said:Why? This has nothing to do with football or did you miss that?WSUWALDO said:UVU -- uh, not likely unless they are in a position to add football right away, which I don't think they are.
Seriously?!? You think the Big Sky is thinking of adding non-football playing members? If that were the case Denver and Seattle would already be members.
How is this not about football? If you don't have a football team, there is no point to applying. Anyone who thinks the WAC is viable as a non-football playing member is fooooooling themselves. Get over yourself dude and get with the freakin program. You better believe this is about Football. Last I checked the Big Sky conference had 13 football members and 11 all-sport members. You are the supposed (self-proclaimed of course) king of data. I would have thought you knew how to count. Right now the Sky needs another football playing member to get to two divisions, and it is in the Sky's best interest to find an ALL-SPORTS member to bring that number to 12/14. So, yeah, I'm pretty sure this is about football. Only options, IDAHO and New Mexico State. I wouldn't want anyone else, unless it was a team from one of the Dakota's.
If you go to Bruce's Bar I'll get ya a beer for all the insults I've levied at you over the past year.
AZGrizFan said:WSUWALDO said:kemajic said:Why? This has nothing to do with football or did you miss that?WSUWALDO said:UVU- uh, not likely unless they are in a position to add football right away, which I don't think they are.
Seriously?!? You think the Big Sky is thinking of adding non-football playing members? If that were the case Denver and Seattle would already be members.
How is this not about football? If you don't have a football team, there is no point to applying. Anyone who thinks the WAC is viable as a non-football playing member is fooooooling themselves. Get over yourself dude and get with the freakin program. You better believe this is about Football. Last I checked the Big Sky conference had 13 football members and 11 all-sport members. You are the supposed (self-proclaimed of course) king of data. I would have thought you knew how to count. Right now the Sky needs another football playing member to get to two divisions, and it is in the Sky's best interest to find an ALL-SPORTS member to bring that number to 12/14. So, yeah, I'm pretty sure this is about football. Only options, IDAHO and New Mexico State. I wouldn't want anyone else, unless it was a team from one of the Dakota's.
If you go to Bruce's Bar I'll get ya a beer for all the insults I've levied at you over the past year.
Dude. Read the thread. :roll:
AZGrizFan said:Interesting.
6 other teams (outside of Idaho?)...who might they be?
More D-II move ups? Western Oregon? Central Washington? Simon Frazer? San Diego from the Patriot?
Washington State? :lol: :lol: :lol:
AZGrizFan said:WILDCATFAN said:THe whole idea of the merger is in reality from a basketball point of view, however, you know that football would be in the back of the Big Sky's mind when or if they invite any more members.
I think Idaho moves thier olympic sports to the Sky, and keeps thier FBS staus via independence and unless someone picks them up, they will return to the Big Sky eventually, they are not BYU or Notre Dame, they do not have the money to survive independence.
And Im not entirely sure I like the idea of a merger, because I have a feeling Weber will be separated from thier traditional rivals.
But if it got you NMSU on the schedule twice a year, wouldn't that be a nice tradeoff from an RPI standpoint?
kemajic said:You can't read. Did you see any mention of BSC football-only members CPSLO and UC Davis? Uh-no. And BSU is included, so in your delusion you think this means football? Uh-no. Is that a Weber education you're sporting?WSUWALDO said:kemajic said:Why? This has nothing to do with football or did you miss that?WSUWALDO said:UVU -- uh, not likely unless they are in a position to add football right away, which I don't think they are.
Seriously?!? You think the Big Sky is thinking of adding non-football playing members? If that were the case Denver and Seattle would already be members.
How is this not about football? If you don't have a football team, there is no point to applying. Anyone who thinks the WAC is viable as a non-football playing member is fooooooling themselves. Get over yourself dude and get with the freakin program. You better believe this is about Football. Last I checked the Big Sky conference had 13 football members and 11 all-sport members. You are the supposed (self-proclaimed of course) king of data. I would have thought you knew how to count. Right now the Sky needs another football playing member to get to two divisions, and it is in the Sky's best interest to find an ALL-SPORTS member to bring that number to 12/14. So, yeah, I'm pretty sure this is about football. Only options, IDAHO and New Mexico State. I wouldn't want anyone else, unless it was a team from one of the Dakota's.
If you go to Bruce's Bar I'll get ya a beer for all the insults I've levied at you over the past year.
Then, why would YOU introduce the MWC link, which got a lot of airplay and had nothing to do with football? You still can't read; I stated in my last post that CPSLO and UC Davis were BSC football-only members, but were not mentioned in the MWC thread you introduced, as evidence that it had nothing to do with football.WSUWALDO said:kemajic said:You can't read. Did you see any mention of BSC football-only members CPSLO and UC Davis? Uh-no. And BSU is included, so in your delusion you think this means football? Uh-no. Is that a Weber education you're sporting?WSUWALDO said:kemajic said:Why? This has nothing to do with football or did you miss that?
Seriously?!? You think the Big Sky is thinking of adding non-football playing members? If that were the case Denver and Seattle would already be members.
How is this not about football? If you don't have a football team, there is no point to applying. Anyone who thinks the WAC is viable as a non-football playing member is fooooooling themselves. Get over yourself dude and get with the freakin program. You better believe this is about Football. Last I checked the Big Sky conference had 13 football members and 11 all-sport members. You are the supposed (self-proclaimed of course) king of data. I would have thought you knew how to count. Right now the Sky needs another football playing member to get to two divisions, and it is in the Sky's best interest to find an ALL-SPORTS member to bring that number to 12/14. So, yeah, I'm pretty sure this is about football. Only options, IDAHO and New Mexico State. I wouldn't want anyone else, unless it was a team from one of the Dakota's.
If you go to Bruce's Bar I'll get ya a beer for all the insults I've levied at you over the past year.
Dude...seriously!! You quoted me. I wasn't talking about the MWC forum. I was putting in my two cents on possible teams that want an invitation to the Big Sky. YES, I do recognize that there are WAC teams that don't have football, that probably want in. Yes, I read that, but I wasn't commenting on that and IMHO the Sky isn't going to let in teams without a football team, unless it is Idaho.
If you quote someone, you probably should have some idea of what they are talking about. Granted, this is a forum and there really isn't a fluid conversation, but no where in the title of this thread is there a mention of a merger between the WAC and SKy for Oly sports. BESIDES THIS IS A FOOTBALL FORUM!! Why would we be talking about basketball. Also, why would I, or anyone else for that matter, even mention CPSLO of Davis? They are already members of the Big Sky or has that escaped your attention.
kemajic said:Then, why would YOU introduce the MWC link, which got a lot of airplay and had nothing to do with football? You still can't read; I stated in my last post that CPSLO and UC Davis were BSC football-only members, but were not mentioned in the MWC thread you introduced, as evidence that it had nothing to do with football.WSUWALDO said:kemajic said:You can't read. Did you see any mention of BSC football-only members CPSLO and UC Davis? Uh-no. And BSU is included, so in your delusion you think this means football? Uh-no. Is that a Weber education you're sporting?WSUWALDO said:Seriously?!? You think the Big Sky is thinking of adding non-football playing members? If that were the case Denver and Seattle would already be members.
How is this not about football? If you don't have a football team, there is no point to applying. Anyone who thinks the WAC is viable as a non-football playing member is fooooooling themselves. Get over yourself dude and get with the freakin program. You better believe this is about Football. Last I checked the Big Sky conference had 13 football members and 11 all-sport members. You are the supposed (self-proclaimed of course) king of data. I would have thought you knew how to count. Right now the Sky needs another football playing member to get to two divisions, and it is in the Sky's best interest to find an ALL-SPORTS member to bring that number to 12/14. So, yeah, I'm pretty sure this is about football. Only options, IDAHO and New Mexico State. I wouldn't want anyone else, unless it was a team from one of the Dakota's.
If you go to Bruce's Bar I'll get ya a beer for all the insults I've levied at you over the past year.
Dude...seriously!! You quoted me. I wasn't talking about the MWC forum. I was putting in my two cents on possible teams that want an invitation to the Big Sky. YES, I do recognize that there are WAC teams that don't have football, that probably want in. Yes, I read that, but I wasn't commenting on that and IMHO the Sky isn't going to let in teams without a football team, unless it is Idaho.
If you quote someone, you probably should have some idea of what they are talking about. Granted, this is a forum and there really isn't a fluid conversation, but no where in the title of this thread is there a mention of a merger between the WAC and SKy for Oly sports. BESIDES THIS IS A FOOTBALL FORUM!! Why would we be talking about basketball. Also, why would I, or anyone else for that matter, even mention CPSLO of Davis? They are already members of the Big Sky or has that escaped your attention.
WSUWALDO said:AZGrizFan said:Interesting.
6 other teams (outside of Idaho?)...who might they be?
More D-II move ups? Western Oregon? Central Washington? Simon Frazer? San Diego from the Patriot?
Washington State? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Interesting...You got it at the first
This is what I'm talking about...
Easy mistake to make; you all look alike....WSUWALDO said:kemajic said:Then, why would YOU introduce the MWC link, which got a lot of airplay and had nothing to do with football? You still can't read; I stated in my last post that CPSLO and UC Davis were BSC football-only members, but were not mentioned in the MWC thread you introduced, as evidence that it had nothing to do with football.WSUWALDO said:kemajic said:You can't read. Did you see any mention of BSC football-only members CPSLO and UC Davis? Uh-no. And BSU is included, so in your delusion you think this means football? Uh-no. Is that a Weber education you're sporting?
Dude...seriously!! You quoted me. I wasn't talking about the MWC forum. I was putting in my two cents on possible teams that want an invitation to the Big Sky. YES, I do recognize that there are WAC teams that don't have football, that probably want in. Yes, I read that, but I wasn't commenting on that and IMHO the Sky isn't going to let in teams without a football team, unless it is Idaho.
If you quote someone, you probably should have some idea of what they are talking about. Granted, this is a forum and there really isn't a fluid conversation, but no where in the title of this thread is there a mention of a merger between the WAC and SKy for Oly sports. BESIDES THIS IS A FOOTBALL FORUM!! Why would we be talking about basketball. Also, why would I, or anyone else for that matter, even mention CPSLO of Davis? They are already members of the Big Sky or has that escaped your attention.
HILARIOUS MOMENT!! Oh how the might have fallen. Wow, last I checked, WSUWALDO is definitely different from WILDCATFAN, he introduced the MWC thread. Where did you get your education from again? Comment on my reading abilities and you can't tell the differenct between two completely different names. Hmmm...guess you aren't the poster child for Montana scholars. EPIC FAIL... Thank you Kemajic for proving to everyone on this forum and yourself how DUMB you really are.