• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

How I would've dealt with discipline issues as a coach

See how stupid they have to get with their arguments to keep these guys in the lineup?

Fact is simly that if JOD had done his job and stopped this crime spree 8 years ago we wouldnt be in the national media and he may still have his job.

But he didnt and was fired. That was just Engstrom doing his job and hes doing it nicely. Future ADs now know that he wont put up with any BS and there wont be another crime spree like the Hauck/ODay debacle of 2003-2012
 
BWahlberg said:
hokeyfine said:
Pretty simple solution. If a player has a legal issue(minor or major) he's off the team until it's settled by the court.

If I'm the opposing team then I'm calling in alleged incidients on a few select starting players for the Griz every Friday before a home game.


Well that pretty much is the way the new code is written. (Unless of course the waiting is a greater penalty than the "guilty" verdict.) Being accused is one thing, probable cause is another. Lots of folks are in jail or on Bond because of what they are accused of and sufficient evidence exists to think they may have done it. In the real world outside of academia folks are put on administrative leave pending outcome regularly.
 
PlayerRep said:
getgrizzy said:
PlayerRep said:
getgrizzy said:

I'm just trying to hold some of you lying posters accountable. Coming on the board and claiming players did things they didn't do, making up stuff, and telling outright lies. Like a slightly fractured cheek bone, which may not have even been caused by a particular player, is a "broken jaw". And you talk about personal accountability. What hypocrites.
start with yourself, fool. you're an even bigger hypocrite for calling someone a hypocrite when you're a hypocrite. as in you think you have to have the police invovled to be in trouble. stop saying players who are in trouble aren't in trouble. quit lying about that and then you can point fingers. wasn't that you on the cover of the book, "lies. and the lying liars that tell them."?

Don't be such a baby. I caught you lying, again. Practice some personal accountability yourself. Hypocrite.
i'm mature and accountable about all this. quit trying to deflect your own shortcomings onto someone else it just puts the spotlight on you, which is why you're holding multiple conversations right now.
 
BWahlberg said:
hokeyfine said:
Pretty simple solution. If a player has a legal issue(minor or major) he's off the team until it's settled by the court.

If I'm the opposing team then I'm calling in alleged incidients on a few select starting players for the Griz every Friday before a home game.
TxGriz said:
hokeyfine said:
Pretty simple solution. If a player has a legal issue(minor or major) he's off the team until it's settled by the court.

So the burden of proof is on the accused to "clear their names" to their accusers, or guilty until proven innocent?

How about waiting until a jury hands down a verdict or the accused enters a plea of guilty before declaring a crime has been committed? I know that doesn't play to the hysteria of the lynch mob, or newpapers frantically grasping at any straw to boost their circulation, or any reporter to promote their own career, but it is the underprinning of our legal system, lest we all have forgotten that the court of public opinion reigns supreme over the land.

my statement says nothing about accusations. If you are charged in a court of law, you are off until the it makes it's way through the system.
 
It is incredibly fu*king sad when you guys have lowered the bar so low that Growler1 is the second smartest poster on here.

I guess thats what happens when you lemmings follow the fat lawyer off the cliff with your heads neck deep in his ass.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
 
I have no problem with the new Code of Conduct except for the fact that there is no transparency between the university and the rest of the world, the public will never know what or if anything has been done in the way of punishment for any perceived crime or indiscretion...or even if there actually was a crime or an indiscretion. Thus, the rumor mills will continue to run amok, and lots of folks will end up being wrongly accused of doing or not doing something. And, so far as I can see, little will change.
 
"t is better [one hundred] guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer."

--Benjamin Franklin (known Communist)
 
AllWeatherFan said:
"t is better [one hundred] guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer."

--Benjamin Franklin (known Communist)

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :roll:
 
Back
Top