• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

House decision and the Feds

717s7e

Well-known member
In yesterday's press conference (July 31, 2025) regarding reviving the old Presidential Fitness Award, Trump said that the current NCAA situation was a mess and that his advisory panel would make recommendations to change the situation. I think that all that can be done at the Federal level is to have Congress override the House decision by giving the NCAA an exemption from federal antitrust laws.

Trump was an NCAA athlete (baseball player) who under the House decision probably wouldn't get a nickel as all of the money appears to be headed to football and basketball. I assume that he is peeved by that. I wonder how many members of Congress share that frustration. Trump has a way of making things happen - will be interesting to see if anything changes at the Federal level.

Any lawyers out there have any thoughts?
 
To answer my own question, I did a ChatGPT search about the House "mess." I didn't hear anything about this executive order in the news.

Key Actions from Trump’s Executive Order (Signed July 24–25, 2025)​


1.​


  • Directed the Secretary of Labor and National Labor Relations Board to define if student-athletes should be considered employees of their universities, aiming to standardize employment rules and limit potential for unregulated labor claims AP News+15AP News+15NEWS BEEP+15.
  • The goal: “maximize the educational benefits and opportunities” of college sports without turning collegiate athletics into professional sports The Washington Post+8The Washington Post+8ESPN.com+8.

2.​



3.​


  • Required schools with over $125 million annual athletic revenue to maintain or increase scholarship and roster opportunities for non-revenue sports, such as women’s athletics and Olympic programs.
  • Institutions below that threshold must at least preserve existing levels WVTM+15WUFT+15Chron+15Politico.
  • Emphasized fair allocation of new revenue sharing without disadvantaging non-revenue sports The White HouseInvestopedia.

4.​


  • Ordered the Attorney General and Federal Trade Commission to develop a plan within 60 days to safeguard college athletics from frivolous antitrust or eligibility lawsuits and protect student-athletes’ rights AP News+9The White House+9The White House+9.
  • Engaged federal agencies to create enforcement strategies using tools like Title IX and federal funding levers Reddit+2WVIA+2The Guardian+2.

5.​


  • Directed coordination with U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committees to preserve college athletics' role in developing elite athletes.
  • Aimed to ensure that non-revenue and women’s sports remain viable pathways to Olympic competition FOX Sports+3KPRC+3WKMG+3Investopedia.
 
In yesterday's press conference (July 31, 2025) regarding reviving the old Presidential Fitness Award, Trump said that the current NCAA situation was a mess and that his advisory panel would make recommendations to change the situation. I think that all that can be done at the Federal level is to have Congress override the House decision by giving the NCAA an exemption from federal antitrust laws.

Trump was an NCAA athlete (baseball player) who under the House decision probably wouldn't get a nickel as all of the money appears to be headed to football and basketball. I assume that he is peeved by that. I wonder how many members of Congress share that frustration. Trump has a way of making things happen - will be interesting to see if anything changes at the Federal level.

Any lawyers out there have any thoughts?
Donald Trump was not an NCAA athlete, lol. He wasn't nearly as good in high school as he claimed to be. He had a .200 batting average in HS.

I agree with you, though, about congress needing to pass an anti-trust exemption. Until they do, I don't see the NCAA winning any cases. I'm not a lawyer, though.
 
Sports may be a refuge from politics but it is not a refuge from the courts.

This enlightening article from Politico explains that the Feds are much farther long on regulating this issue than I thought. I wonder where Montana's Congressional delegation stands on these issues. I wasn't aware that any of this was going on in response to House.

Trump signs executive order to 'protect' college sports​

The White House order comes amid heightened interest in stabilizing the college athletics system after a wave of litigation.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday (July 30, 2025) to prop up college athletics by limiting programs’ ability to steer money toward sports like football and basketball at the expense of others.

The order, which comes amid lawmakers’ heightened interest in having Washington play a role in regulating student-athletes, cast the current state of college sports in apocalyptic terms.

It claims that recent litigation has cumulatively chipped away at the NCAA’s ability to police athletes, and has threatened the viability of women’s sports and so-called Olympic sports like gymnastics as more money flows to athletes in revenue-generating programs and schools attempt to lure highly prized recruits from high schools or other colleges.

“Absent guardrails to stop the madness and ensure a reasonable, balanced use of resources across collegiate athletic programs that preserves their educational and developmental benefits, many college sports will soon cease to exist,” Trump’s executive order states.

To that end, the order requires athletic departments with more than $125 million in revenue during the 2024-2025 season to offer more scholarships in “non-revenue sports” than they did the prior year. Programs with less revenue are instructed to maintain or avoid disproportionately reducing such scholarships, or eliminate roster spots.

Separately, Trump’s order seeks to shield college athletics from further litigation and instructs the Department of Labor and the National Labor Relations Board with “clarifying” the employment status of collegiate athletes.

Universities have fiercely resisted attempts to classify college athletes as employees, a designation that gained momentum during the Biden administration and would grant them a host of labor protections. A deluge of legal challenges by current and former athletes, as well as state attorneys general, have succeeded in allowing players to be compensated for their name, image and likeness — resulting in six- and seven-figure payouts for some stars — and undercutting restrictions on athletes’ ability to transfer between schools.






Trump’s order calls for the prohibition of the “third-party market of pay-for-play inducements,” but allows athletes to get paid “fair market value” for endorsements or other services. That largely duplicates part of a recently finalized legal settlement involving the NCAA, which governs most college sports programs.

The Departments of Justice, Education, Health and Human Services, as well as the Federal Trade Commission will have to develop a plan to effectuate Trump’s policy within 30 days.

It is not immediately clear how the White House intends to enforce such a directive, but the Trump administration has been aggressive in pushing its agenda on universities before, such as its efforts to bring colleges to heel for their handling of campus antisemitism.

The NCAA and universities have lobbied Congress to pass legislation that would cement their authority over the college athletics system. Two House committees on Wednesday advanced a bill that would bar student-athletes from being considered employees and, similarly to the executive order, shield intercollegiate sports officials from federal antitrust law.

Three of the committee chairs leading that effort praised Trump and said the legislation, known as the SCORE Act, “will complement the President’s executive order, and we look forward to working with all of our colleagues in Congress to build a stronger and more durable college sports environment.”

Trump’s executive order comes hours after Charlie Baker, the head of the NCAA, said such action would be largely insufficient to address the structural issues with the collegiate sports industry.

Watch: The Conversation​






“Our focus for now really needs to be on trying to get this stuff dealt with through the legislative process because that, at the end of the day, is really the only vehicle we feel can deal with those issues,” he said at the National Press Club in D.C.

After Trump’s order was released, Baker issued a statement saying that the NCAA “appreciates the Trump Administration’s focus on the life-changing opportunities college sports provides millions of young people and we look forward to working with student-athletes, a bipartisan coalition in Congress and the Trump Administration to enhance college sports for years to come.”
 
Donald Trump was not an NCAA athlete, lol. He wasn't nearly as good in high school as he claimed to be. He had a .200 batting average in HS.

I agree with you, though, about congress needing to pass an anti-trust exemption. Until they do, I don't see the NCAA winning any cases. I'm not a lawyer, though.
Trump played with Growler on their imaginary baseball team.
 
I am not convinced it will have a big impact without follow‑through from Congress.

The order tells large athletic programs to add scholarships for non‑revenue sports, directs agencies to clarify whether college athletes are employees, and instructs the federal government to crack down on third‑party pay‑for‑play deals while still allowing fair‑market NIL payments. On paper it sounds like it is protecting smaller sports, but the order does not override any of the court decisions that allowed NIL money or loosened transfer restrictions. Executive orders cannot change existing law or court rulings, and agencies are limited to issuing guidance and enforcing current law.

Enforcement could be a challenge. Schools with athletic budgets over 125 million dollars are supposed to add or maintain non‑revenue scholarships, but the order does not create a clear auditing or penalty process. Unless federal agencies implement strict reporting and oversight, much of this will rely on self‑reporting.

Even the NCAA said that meaningful change will likely require legislation. Executive orders can set priorities and make headlines, but they rarely resolve complicated legal issues on their own.
 
I tried to understand this whole mess but it took too much brain power so I have decided to simply not care. Que Sera Sera. Whatever will be will be.

(And by mess I mean the whole House settlement thing, not just Trump's executive order.)
 
Last edited:
I tried to understand this whole mess but it took too much brain power so I have decided to simply not care. Que Sera Sera. Whatever will be will be.
Im the same with politics. I’ve started my own political part called the Ostrich Party but we’re not very active.
head-in-sand-ostrich.gif
 
Its not politics but it is Big Brother federal government injecting itself into almost all of American life.
College athletics, Pro FB names, College curriculum, Private companies and their ESG policies.
Quoting David Brooks, "
Donald Trump is a big-government populist who has destroyed small government conservatism. He’s using state power to adopt a mercantilist tariff policy that redirects global trade flows. He’s using industrial policy to pick economic winners and losers. He’s using state power to micromanage key universities. The Trump Defense Department just spent $400 million to become that largest shareholder of a private rare-earth elements company. Trump got himself a “golden share” of U.S. Steel, giving the president sweeping powers over a private company’s business decisions.

Nearly 45 years ago, Ronald Reagan said in his first inaugural, “In the present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.” That seems like an ice age ago. Now we have an administration that’s all about concentrated executive power and relentless federal action."
 
So you're saying the previous administration was small government conservatism? You have a long ways to catch up.
Not the previous admin. But I'm old enough to remember the small government conservatism of Reagan. That is now gone from both parties.
 
Not the previous admin. But I'm old enough to remember the small government conservatism of Reagan. That is now gone from both parties.
It is clear that the DOGE initiative is not aimed at increasing the size of government.
 
It is clear that the DOGE initiative is not aimed at increasing the size of government.
It's not clear the DOGE initiative was aimed at anything other than taking our personal and most sensitive data and handing it over to Palantir to create a system for BIG GOV'T to spy on us in a way that wasn't possible before. Trump is the Deep State he always warned us about.
 
Back
Top