Here is hoping Bobby gets back to his winning ways

[PDXGrizzly]

Abscissa is UM Football Coaches
Ordinate is mean proportion of wins per season coached
Error Bars are standard error of the mean (SEM)
Multiply the ordinate by 100 if you want mean percentage of wins per year. (Some of you will want to multiply the ordinate by 200--I guess.)

I know that some people like certain types of stats (I’m looking at you PR) but, as an Environmental Scientist/Chemist, these are the types of stats that float my boat.

And here I thought you would be all about Chi-square analyses.

Edit: For real though, if you all one something else analyzed, give me the question and the database where I can find the raw data. I would be happy to make some figures for you all.

Depends on what I’m doing...

I’ve been doing more ANNOVA lately

 

[grizpsych]

Abscissa is UM Football Coaches
Ordinate is mean proportion of wins per season coached
Error Bars are standard error of the mean (SEM)
Multiply the ordinate by 100 if you want mean percentage of wins per year. (Some of you will want to multiply the ordinate by 200--I guess.)

I know that some people like certain types of stats (I’m looking at you PR) but, as an Environmental Scientist/Chemist, these are the types of stats that float my boat.

And here I thought you would be all about Chi-square analyses.

Edit: For real though, if you all one something else analyzed, give me the question and the database where I can find the raw data. I would be happy to make some figures for you all.

Depends on what I’m doing...

I’ve been doing more ANNOVA lately

Do you mean ANOVA? If not, I would love to learn about ANNOVA.

We could do a One-way here. With planned comparisons or post-hoc analysis my guess is that it would show that Pflu and Stitt are significantly worse than the others. However, it would be really under powered. That's one reason why I didn't do it.

 

[Griz#64]

That represents the standard error of the mean. Wait til he gets to the Standard deviation, and the standard error of the standard deviation. and the standard error of the standard error, and the F tables.. Statistics 101 with Harry Adams....Go Griz

 

[grizpsych]

That represents the standard error of the mean. Wait til he gets to the Standard deviation, and the standard error of the standard deviation. and the standard error of the standard error, and the F tables.. Statistics 101 with Harry Adams....Go Griz

SE is just SD divided by the square root of sample size? Conceptually, SD is the variation within a sample and SE is the variation expected from sample to sample, or expected variation of the sample from the population mean. Go Griz.

I originally did SD. But, then I figured I wanted to make some predictions.

 

[grizpsych]

Ha, here is an analysis between Sneed this year and Jensen last year. Don't buy PR's story.

https://imgur.com/a/tFCxUoH

 

[PDXGrizzly]

I know that some people like certain types of stats (I’m looking at you PR) but, as an Environmental Scientist/Chemist, these are the types of stats that float my boat.

And here I thought you would be all about Chi-square analyses.

Edit: For real though, if you all one something else analyzed, give me the question and the database where I can find the raw data. I would be happy to make some figures for you all.

Depends on what I’m doing...

I’ve been doing more ANNOVA lately

Do you mean ANOVA? If not, I would love to learn about ANNOVA.

We could do a One-way here. With planned comparisons or post-hoc analysis my guess is that it would show that Pflu and Stitt are significantly worse than the others. However, it would be really under powered. That's one reason why I didn't do it.

fat thumbs and no proofreading...

 

[grizpsych]

And here I thought you would be all about Chi-square analyses.

Edit: For real though, if you all one something else analyzed, give me the question and the database where I can find the raw data. I would be happy to make some figures for you all.

Depends on what I’m doing...

I’ve been doing more ANNOVA lately

Do you mean ANOVA? If not, I would love to learn about ANNOVA.

We could do a One-way here. With planned comparisons or post-hoc analysis my guess is that it would show that Pflu and Stitt are significantly worse than the others. However, it would be really under powered. That's one reason why I didn't do it.

fat thumbs and no proofreading...

No worries. I spelled my high school's name wrong (Sentinel) the other day. PR made sure to point it out. Here, I thought it may be an analysis I didn't know. You know, ANOVA, MANOVA, ANCOVA, MANCOVA, etc. There are a lot of them.

 

[PDXGrizzly]

Depends on what I’m doing...

I’ve been doing more ANNOVA lately

Do you mean ANOVA? If not, I would love to learn about ANNOVA.

We could do a One-way here. With planned comparisons or post-hoc analysis my guess is that it would show that Pflu and Stitt are significantly worse than the others. However, it would be really under powered. That's one reason why I didn't do it.

fat thumbs and no proofreading...

No worries. I spelled my high school's name wrong (Sentinel) the other day. PR made sure to point it out. Here, I thought it may be an analysis I didn't know. You know, ANOVA, MANOVA, ANCOVA, MANCOVA, etc. There are a lot of them.

Well, maybe I should discover a new statistical analysis called “ANNOVA” just to mask my shame...

 

[PlayerRep]

Depends on what I’m doing...

I’ve been doing more ANNOVA lately

Do you mean ANOVA? If not, I would love to learn about ANNOVA.

We could do a One-way here. With planned comparisons or post-hoc analysis my guess is that it would show that Pflu and Stitt are significantly worse than the others. However, it would be really under powered. That's one reason why I didn't do it.

fat thumbs and no proofreading...

No worries. I spelled my high school's name wrong (Sentinel) the other day. PR made sure to point it out. Here, I thought it may be an analysis I didn't know. You know, ANOVA, MANOVA, ANCOVA, MANCOVA, etc. There are a lot of them.

When did I point out a misspelling of Sentinel?

 

[grizpsych]

Do you mean ANOVA? If not, I would love to learn about ANNOVA.

We could do a One-way here. With planned comparisons or post-hoc analysis my guess is that it would show that Pflu and Stitt are significantly worse than the others. However, it would be really under powered. That's one reason why I didn't do it.

fat thumbs and no proofreading...

No worries. I spelled my high school's name wrong (Sentinel) the other day. PR made sure to point it out. Here, I thought it may be an analysis I didn't know. You know, ANOVA, MANOVA, ANCOVA, MANCOVA, etc. There are a lot of them.

Well, maybe I should discover a new statistical analysis called “ANNOVA” just to mask my shame...

Lol. Do it.

 

[grizpsych]

Do you mean ANOVA? If not, I would love to learn about ANNOVA.

We could do a One-way here. With planned comparisons or post-hoc analysis my guess is that it would show that Pflu and Stitt are significantly worse than the others. However, it would be really under powered. That's one reason why I didn't do it.

fat thumbs and no proofreading...

No worries. I spelled my high school's name wrong (Sentinel) the other day. PR made sure to point it out. Here, I thought it may be an analysis I didn't know. You know, ANOVA, MANOVA, ANCOVA, MANCOVA, etc. There are a lot of them.

When did I point out a misspelling of Sentinel?

I thought you did in the post where you called me a negg, an irritant, a law breaker, etc. I guess maybe I was primed for you to point out spelling errors too. Weird.

 

[grizpsych]

Ha, here is an analysis between Sneed this year and Jensen last year. Don't buy PR's story.

https://imgur.com/a/tFCxUoH

A little more knowledge about this test. The resulting star of -1.59 is from a fraction. The numerator of the fraction is the measured difference between Sneed and Jensen. This difference could be a real difference or just due to chance differences from the universe. The denominator of this fraction is the expected difference due to the universe. Thus, any number greater than one means that we observed more difference than we would have expected just due to chance.