• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Hauck back to Montana?

Status
Not open for further replies.
griz5700 said:
Stop_HammerTime69 said:
get'em_griz said:
Plot twist: What if Petrino leaves Idaho and Bobby Hauck takes the Idaho Job? :o
That would help show if Hauck is actually good at rebuilding a program. But that would create some weird bizarro universe I don't want to live in.

You think Idaho is in a rebuilding phase?
They just finished 9-4 with a bowl win over Colorado State.

:lol: :lol: MC Scammer is not off to a good posting start here...
 
Coach Stitt made the decision to change strategies from the tried-and-tested -- and successful -- approach of the Griz.

Apparently, the theory was that the former Griz strategy was not successful. Think about that one for a while.

Apparently, the theory was that a long-time D2 Coach with middling career success using an occasionally used strategy in a small backwater D2 division would turn it into a rousing success against experienced D1 coaches, and would do so by putting career D3 and D2 coaches in charge of experienced D1 coaches.

It's hindsight, but it's an interesting theory.
 
UMGriz75 said:
Coach Stitt made the decision to change strategies from the tried-and-tested -- and successful -- approach of the Griz.

Apparently, the theory was that the former Griz strategy was not successful. Think about that one for a while.

Apparently, the theory was that a long-time D2 Coach with middling career success using an occasionally used strategy in a small backwater D2 division would turn it into a rousing success against experienced D1 coaches, and would do so by putting career D3 and D2 coaches in charge of experienced D1 coaches.

It's hindsight, but it's an interesting theory.

Didn't we try an hire the MT. Union coach, D-2 or 3 but won like 6 NC'S.
 
Winning national championships (plural) at D2 level is far different than mediocre (at best) at D2 level.
 
griz5700 said:
Stop_HammerTime69 said:
get'em_griz said:
Plot twist: What if Petrino leaves Idaho and Bobby Hauck takes the Idaho Job? :o
That would help show if Hauck is actually good at rebuilding a program. But that would create some weird bizarro universe I don't want to live in.

You think Idaho is in a rebuilding phase?
They just finished 9-4 with a bowl win over Colorado State.

That was a pretty senior-dependent roster. It's back to the drawing board this season.
 
Stop_HammerTime69 said:
i_the_sky said:
I haven't had a lot of luck lately but hopefully that will change, this year, with Bobby coming back and turning this thing around before it's to late Hauck= fundamentals. Stit= politician.. Do not, under any circumstance give Stit a new contract (of any kind!) Special teams says it all...Hauck = solid offense, solid defense and outstanding special teams! Hauck= win, win, win!!! Stit= pray, pray, PRAY!!! Welcome back coach Hauck!

It sounds more like you hate Stitt than you remember anything about Hauck. Also, your lack of ability to put things into any sense of context is hilarious.

UMGriz75 said:
Griz_Football.jpg

I can't tell if you brought that up to make a point about Stitt sucking and Hauck being fantastic, but thanks for giving me the means to show some context. Look at the previous two coaches Stitt and Hauck were following up. Hauck didn't have to do any dirty work to rebuild the program. The talent and infrastructure to absolutely dominate was already there. Stitt has had to rebuild and put the infrastructure there himself. I get the feeling he will end up with a similar tenure and record as Don Read, given his track record in the past.

get'em_griz said:
Plot twist: What if Petrino leaves Idaho and Bobby Hauck takes the Idaho Job? :o

That would help show if Hauck is actually good at rebuilding a program. But that would create some weird bizarro universe I don't want to live in.

This is a good post, I like the infrastructure analogy.

Hauck's reign was basically like taking over Paris, ya it went through some shit with the wars but it was still Paris. Big, beautiful, city of the world with abundant arts and culture.

Stitt is essentially trying to build a brand new city, starting with the sewers and foundations all over. It has to take time!
 
BadlandsGrizFan said:
Hauck's reign was basically like taking over Paris, ya it went through some shit with the wars but it was still Paris. Big, beautiful, city of the world with abundant arts and culture.

Stitt is essentially trying to build a brand new city, starting with the sewers and foundations all over. It has to take time!
This operates on the assumption that coaches improve with experience, and that the UM coach is the only when gaining experience. It also assume he has the talent to begin with at the D1 level; a talent he did not convincingly demonstrate in his 15 years at the D2 level against powerhouses like Chadron State.

Aside from the howling logical fallacy ....
 
kemajic said:
Fat Bruno said:
The idea of Hauck coming back has the same appeal as a second Trump term. Punks creating punkery all around them and sewing the seeds for the disasters to come ... both embarrassments to the institutions they represent. You couldn’t watch a Hauck half-time interview without cringing at his churlish, childish performance.
You have something against leaders that get stuff done and win. Make Montana Great Again Bobby!

Wow! A guy who still supports Trump after all the astounding winning he’s done. But, we do become a bigger laughing stock to the rest of the world, every day. That cretinous blurt alone should bar you from adult conversation. Trump's making America great again like Hauck made Vegas great. I will grant you this … Hauck has shown a belated ability to grow up which Trump will never have, but he’s not even remotely the answer to rebuilding a program.

Four out of five seasons with two victories.

Record of 15-49.

" In five seasons, he failed to develop a quality quarterback in a pass-happy era of college football; he failed to recruit a single player whom the NFL deemed draftable (although senior wide receiver Devante Davis should break that streak in the spring); his assistant coaches at times seemed in over their heads; and not only did he fail to win a single non-conference game of consequence, he lost twice to I-AA schools … at home! That’s as inexcusable as it is incomprehensible."

No, in hindsight, Bobby Hauck wasn’t “The Winner” we so boldly proclaimed him to be on the cover of that 2010 issue in which my profile of Hauck appeared."
Matt Jacob
 
UMGriz75 said:
BadlandsGrizFan said:
Hauck's reign was basically like taking over Paris, ya it went through some shit with the wars but it was still Paris. Big, beautiful, city of the world with abundant arts and culture.

Stitt is essentially trying to build a brand new city, starting with the sewers and foundations all over. It has to take time!
This operates on the assumption that coaches improve with experience, and that the UM coach is the only when gaining experience. It also assume he has the talent to begin with at the D1 level; a talent he did not convincingly demonstrate in his 15 years at the D2 level against powerhouses like Chadron State.

Aside from the howling logical fallacy ....

I think most coaches do get better with experience....
 
BadlandsGrizFan said:
Stop_HammerTime69 said:
i_the_sky said:
I haven't had a lot of luck lately but hopefully that will change, this year, with Bobby coming back and turning this thing around before it's to late Hauck= fundamentals. Stit= politician.. Do not, under any circumstance give Stit a new contract (of any kind!) Special teams says it all...Hauck = solid offense, solid defense and outstanding special teams! Hauck= win, win, win!!! Stit= pray, pray, PRAY!!! Welcome back coach Hauck!

It sounds more like you hate Stitt than you remember anything about Hauck. Also, your lack of ability to put things into any sense of context is hilarious.

UMGriz75 said:

I can't tell if you brought that up to make a point about Stitt sucking and Hauck being fantastic, but thanks for giving me the means to show some context. Look at the previous two coaches Stitt and Hauck were following up. Hauck didn't have to do any dirty work to rebuild the program. The talent and infrastructure to absolutely dominate was already there. Stitt has had to rebuild and put the infrastructure there himself. I get the feeling he will end up with a similar tenure and record as Don Read, given his track record in the past.

get'em_griz said:
Plot twist: What if Petrino leaves Idaho and Bobby Hauck takes the Idaho Job? :o

That would help show if Hauck is actually good at rebuilding a program. But that would create some weird bizarro universe I don't want to live in.

This is a good post, I like the infrastructure analogy.

Hauck's reign was basically like taking over Paris, ya it went through some shit with the wars but it was still Paris. Big, beautiful, city of the world with abundant arts and culture.

Stitt is essentially trying to build a brand new city, starting with the sewers and foundations all over. It has to take time!

We saw the foundation crack and peered into the sewers last season...good Lord this is stupid. He has a one-year contract...for a reason. He knows it, players know it, BOR knows it...only a few don't.
 
BadlandsGrizFan said:
Stop_HammerTime69 said:
i_the_sky said:
I haven't had a lot of luck lately but hopefully that will change, this year, with Bobby coming back and turning this thing around before it's to late Hauck= fundamentals. Stit= politician.. Do not, under any circumstance give Stit a new contract (of any kind!) Special teams says it all...Hauck = solid offense, solid defense and outstanding special teams! Hauck= win, win, win!!! Stit= pray, pray, PRAY!!! Welcome back coach Hauck!

It sounds more like you hate Stitt than you remember anything about Hauck. Also, your lack of ability to put things into any sense of context is hilarious.

UMGriz75 said:

I can't tell if you brought that up to make a point about Stitt sucking and Hauck being fantastic, but thanks for giving me the means to show some context. Look at the previous two coaches Stitt and Hauck were following up. Hauck didn't have to do any dirty work to rebuild the program. The talent and infrastructure to absolutely dominate was already there. Stitt has had to rebuild and put the infrastructure there himself. I get the feeling he will end up with a similar tenure and record as Don Read, given his track record in the past.

get'em_griz said:
Plot twist: What if Petrino leaves Idaho and Bobby Hauck takes the Idaho Job? :o

That would help show if Hauck is actually good at rebuilding a program. But that would create some weird bizarro universe I don't want to live in.

This is a good post, I like the infrastructure analogy.

Hauck's reign was basically like taking over Paris, ya it went through some shit with the wars but it was still Paris. Big, beautiful, city of the world with abundant arts and culture.

Stitt is essentially trying to build a brand new city, starting with the sewers and foundations all over. It has to take time!

Uhh what?

Uniformed people think Hauck took over some really talented team. He didn't. Informed people will tell you this.

Also, you have never been to Paris have you?
 
Coaches always say that competition brings out the best in players. Hopefully this applies to coaches, as well. C'mon, Coach Stitt - you've got a lot of folks rooting for you! :thumb:
 
kemajic said:
AZGrizFan said:
kemajic said:
Stop_HammerTime69 said:
While I definitely think we'll do better this year, our best this season will probably be 8-3, with losses to Washington, Eastern Washington, and a crazy random one.
We lost 4 of the last 5 games; the only win being ISU who scored 44 against us in Missoula. So there would need to be a step jump change to go 8-3. What is that step jump change?

What was EWU's step jump change between '15 and '16?
Answer a question with a question.... OK, you answer mine and I will answer yours.

Point being, we have just as much chance of having a "step change" as EWU did between '15 and 1'6. LAST season's results don't mean shit. We all start at 0-0 and it's new players, more seasoned coaches, etc, etc., etc.
 
griz5700 said:
BadlandsGrizFan said:
Stop_HammerTime69 said:
i_the_sky said:
I haven't had a lot of luck lately but hopefully that will change, this year, with Bobby coming back and turning this thing around before it's to late Hauck= fundamentals. Stit= politician.. Do not, under any circumstance give Stit a new contract (of any kind!) Special teams says it all...Hauck = solid offense, solid defense and outstanding special teams! Hauck= win, win, win!!! Stit= pray, pray, PRAY!!! Welcome back coach Hauck!

It sounds more like you hate Stitt than you remember anything about Hauck. Also, your lack of ability to put things into any sense of context is hilarious.

UMGriz75 said:

I can't tell if you brought that up to make a point about Stitt sucking and Hauck being fantastic, but thanks for giving me the means to show some context. Look at the previous two coaches Stitt and Hauck were following up. Hauck didn't have to do any dirty work to rebuild the program. The talent and infrastructure to absolutely dominate was already there. Stitt has had to rebuild and put the infrastructure there himself. I get the feeling he will end up with a similar tenure and record as Don Read, given his track record in the past.

get'em_griz said:
Plot twist: What if Petrino leaves Idaho and Bobby Hauck takes the Idaho Job? :o

That would help show if Hauck is actually good at rebuilding a program. But that would create some weird bizarro universe I don't want to live in.

This is a good post, I like the infrastructure analogy.

Hauck's reign was basically like taking over Paris, ya it went through some shit with the wars but it was still Paris. Big, beautiful, city of the world with abundant arts and culture.

Stitt is essentially trying to build a brand new city, starting with the sewers and foundations all over. It has to take time!

Uhh what?

Uniformed people think Hauck took over some really talented team. He didn't. Informed people will tell you this.

Also, you have never been to Paris have you?

Look at the numbers man. Seriously. Hauck was given an elite championship contender and Stitt was given something that rhymes with Stitt.
 
Stop_HammerTime69 said:
griz5700 said:
BadlandsGrizFan said:
Stop_HammerTime69 said:
It sounds more like you hate Stitt than you remember anything about Hauck. Also, your lack of ability to put things into any sense of context is hilarious.



I can't tell if you brought that up to make a point about Stitt sucking and Hauck being fantastic, but thanks for giving me the means to show some context. Look at the previous two coaches Stitt and Hauck were following up. Hauck didn't have to do any dirty work to rebuild the program. The talent and infrastructure to absolutely dominate was already there. Stitt has had to rebuild and put the infrastructure there himself. I get the feeling he will end up with a similar tenure and record as Don Read, given his track record in the past.



That would help show if Hauck is actually good at rebuilding a program. But that would create some weird bizarro universe I don't want to live in.

This is a good post, I like the infrastructure analogy.

Hauck's reign was basically like taking over Paris, ya it went through some shit with the wars but it was still Paris. Big, beautiful, city of the world with abundant arts and culture.

Stitt is essentially trying to build a brand new city, starting with the sewers and foundations all over. It has to take time!

Uhh what?

Uniformed people think Hauck took over some really talented team. He didn't. Informed people will tell you this.

Also, you have never been to Paris have you?

Look at the numbers man. Seriously. Hauck was given an elite championship contender and Stitt was given something that rhymes with Stitt.

Yes, but facts are just a total pain in the ass when you are trying to play Chicken Little. The sky is falling. Panic everyone and replace the coach AGAIN. That would make for what? Five In a ten year time period? Seems logical. Especially when the current coach inherited a program that was a mess quite frankly. Turning the ship around takes time, but impatient spoiled little brat fans want to win and win NOW! Imagine that - we all do. Some of us are just realist and remember the nightmare that occurred post Hauck and pre Stitt. This sh&7 takes time so shut the f up 5700. We get it. You hate Stitt and want Hauck. You beat that horse to death.
 
This seems like the right place for this...

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bAoq7k3tZ0[/youtube]
 
jodcon said:
This seems like the right place for this...

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bAoq7k3tZ0[/youtube]

Perfect choice, because there is not a snowballs chance Hauck will be back.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top