• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Haslam

griznative24

Well-known member
I will admit that I was a Stitt supporter before today. I thought he had this team going in the right direction. I thought he had superior talent compared to Bozeman State.

I was wrong.

My question is to those who were anti stitt for the past few years: Should Haslam be up for an evaluation?

Lets not forget who hired him: royce engstrom, Mr. Anti Athletic Department himself.

As far as I'm concerned he should receive just as much blame as this current coaching staff will.
 
griznative24 said:
I will admit that I was a Stitt supporter before today. I thought he had this team going in the right direction. I thought he had superior talent compared to Bozeman State.

I was wrong.

My question is to those who were anti stitt for the past few years: Should Haslam be up for an evaluation?

Lets not forget who hired him: royce engstrom, Mr. Anti Athletic Department himself.

As far as I'm concerned he should receive just as much blame as this current coaching staff will.
Disagree, he has done well across the board. Someone else shit my pants will never be a viable excuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
dupuyer griz said:
griznative24 said:
I will admit that I was a Stitt supporter before today. I thought he had this team going in the right direction. I thought he had superior talent compared to Bozeman State.

I was wrong.

My question is to those who were anti stitt for the past few years: Should Haslam be up for an evaluation?

Lets not forget who hired him: royce engstrom, Mr. Anti Athletic Department himself.

As far as I'm concerned he should receive just as much blame as this current coaching staff will.
Disagree, he has done well across the board. Someone else shit my pants will never be a viable excuse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fair enough. What has he done across the board? Not being sarcastic, but I can't think of any program thats doing exceptionally well.
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
FYI, I am pretty certain that Engstrom had a large part in hiring Stitt and to an extent limited Haslem during the process.

I was not aware of this. Could that be because of how much they were willing to pay?
 
Tell tale sign if Haslam needs to go will be decided if Semore gets to stay or If Stitt gets anything more than one year even with Semore gone. If he can't see what so many do he needs to go....the attendance drops, no playoffs again, losing to a sub .500 cat team again are more than enough to show a change needs made at DC, and if not a playoff year next year Stitt should go. I can see 1 more year with Stitt if he changes staff to prove himself more than he has shown.
 
Fuck yeah he should be re-evaluated.

I’d love a breakdown of the reasons he hired Stitt. To me - most obvious bad hire of all time. I’ve said this from day 1 btw.
 
Kent comes across as a pompous dickhead. Every interview he belittles our “simple-minded fan base that has totally unrealistic expectations.”...

Fuck him. He’s not a Griz.
 
http://mtpr.org/post/montana-university-officials-condemn-accusations-unfair-hiring-um

Let's also not forget about Haslam's hiring being affected by his religious affiliations.
 
griz5700 said:
Kent comes across as a pompous dickhead. Every interview he belittles our “simple-minded fan base that has totally unrealistic expectations.”...

f*** him. He’s not a Griz.

did he really say that
 
Back
Top