• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Griz WR's on 2016 roster

Atlanta Griz1 said:
horribilisfan8184 said:
Atlanta Griz1 said:
Paytonlives said:
Fellas... keep in mind that the FBS scholarships are all Full ride.

FCS can divided scholarships in many different ways. That's why you see Stitt doing exactly what he had to do at his previous school in Colorado. Finding Great Athletes that will get academic scholarships also. It allows for greater flexibility and deeper 2nd and 3rd string players.

An example is Lamarriel Taylor from UMass. By all reports the guy is a brilliant student. I am quite sure that his academics have taken can of most if not all of the scholarship money he will receive.

So those 20 WR, might only account for 10 to 12 scholarships, or less if there are walk-ons involved.

Totally irrelevant to the discussion. FCS schools can only dress so many players, it is not unlimited just because a bunch of the may be on partials or academic scholarships. My point is, that the FBS teams which use a similar offense with 4-5 WRs in on most plays, only have as many WRs on their squads as UM does, even though they can dress more players. I may be incorrect that FBS schools can dress more players than FCS schools, and, If I am, then I stand corrected. If I am correct, then we have proportionately way more WRs than FBS schools running a similar offense.

Please comment Payton.

Your assumption about what the season roster will look like and position assignments of some of these athletes shows you don't have a clue about Stitt or what he is doing. Pontificating from ignorance is strong in this one.

STFU. You add nothing to the discussion, which is par for the course from you.

Is par for the course 81 for you?
 
horribilisfan8184 said:
Atlanta Griz1 said:
horribilisfan8184 said:
Atlanta Griz1 said:
Totally irrelevant to the discussion. FCS schools can only dress so many players, it is not unlimited just because a bunch of the may be on partials or academic scholarships. My point is, that the FBS teams which use a similar offense with 4-5 WRs in on most plays, only have as many WRs on their squads as UM does, even though they can dress more players. I may be incorrect that FBS schools can dress more players than FCS schools, and, If I am, then I stand corrected. If I am correct, then we have proportionately way more WRs than FBS schools running a similar offense.

Please comment Payton.

Your assumption about what the season roster will look like and position assignments of some of these athletes shows you don't have a clue about Stitt or what he is doing. Pontificating from ignorance is strong in this one.

STFU. You add nothing to the discussion, which is par for the course from you.

Can't. Having too much fun watching you choke on a bucket of f*ck. Why try to add anything serious to your meaningless attempts at shock? If there is ever something of value its hopelessly lost in provocative drivel. I'll take the sugar coating over your horse shit coating every time, and pile on as I see fit. But I won't ask you to STFU, you'll take care of that yourself in no time.

Damnit, AtlantaGriz, he's onto you! :lol: :lol:
 
Atlanta Griz1 said:
Yukon said:
Atlanta Griz1 said:
PlayerRep said:
Remember that those schools have 85 scholarships, and UM is still down 4 schollies. Remember that those schools have larger roster limits too.

Valid point, which flies over the head of 90% on here!
What's your problem? Player made a good point and I accepted that point. Then you have to chime in and be a complete dick about it. You didn't even think about it until Player brought it up. Then you have to act as if you are part of the elite on this board.

I don't try to be part of "the elite". Why don't you make like a hockey player and get the puck out of here? Some drink from the fountain of knowledge. You only gargled!
58027853.jpg
 
Back
Top