• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

GRIZ/Vikings

Nice win, but Tinkle has to be somewhat disappointed in the 2nd half defense, dumb fouls, and missed FT''s. I am surprised PSU did not start fouling Cherry sooner.
 
griz2000 said:
PeauxRouge said:
WTF!? DId he just call us Montana State???
Click to expand...

He did indeed.
Click to expand...

The Big Sky should fine suspend him for that! :shock: jk PSU's announcer did an excellent job... great game by the griz! great job weathering the storm and making plays down the stretch!
 
GRZFTBL said:
Cats piss one away at EWU.
Click to expand...

kittiens have now lost 6 of 7, the Griz have won 8 of 9. Where is kitty fan now telling us how great of a recruiter and coach Huse is? I see scatnation is about to call for his firing. :cry:
 
Grizbacker1 said:
GRZFTBL said:
Cats piss one away at EWU.
Click to expand...

kittiens have now lost 6 of 7, the Griz have won 8 of 9. Where is kitty fan now telling us how great of a recruiter and coach Huse is? I see scatnation is about to call for his firing. :cry:
Click to expand...


They are. :thumb:
 
So if Northern beats WSU and they both happen to lose another game, or WSU beats Northern and WSU let's a couple slip and all three top schools end up with 4 losses, what are the chances of UM hosting? What are the tie-breakers?

Does UM need Weber to beat Northern to even have a chance? If Weber beats Northern tonight, then UM, Weber, and Northern will all have split with each other. If Northern beats Weber, then Northern will have split with UM and swept Weber.
 
General Disarray said:
So if Northern beats WSU and they both happen to lose another game, or WSU beats Northern and WSU let's a couple slip and all three top schools end up with 4 losses, what are the chances of UM hosting? What are the tie-breakers?

Does UM need Weber to beat Northern to even have a chance? If Weber beats Northern tonight, then UM, Weber, and Northern will all have split with each other. If Northern beats Weber, then Northern will have split with UM and swept Weber.
Click to expand...

I would assume, then, that if Northern wins and sweeps Weber that they would win the tie-breaker and host, but I really don't know the official BSC rules, either.
 
PeauxRouge said:
General Disarray said:
So if Northern beats WSU and they both happen to lose another game, or WSU beats Northern and WSU let's a couple slip and all three top schools end up with 4 losses, what are the chances of UM hosting? What are the tie-breakers?

Does UM need Weber to beat Northern to even have a chance? If Weber beats Northern tonight, then UM, Weber, and Northern will all have split with each other. If Northern beats Weber, then Northern will have split with UM and swept Weber.
Click to expand...

I would assume, then, that if Northern wins and sweeps Weber that they would win the tie-breaker and host, but I really don't know the official BSC rules, either.
Click to expand...

Here is the Big Sky Conference tie breaker rules:

1. HEAD TO HEAD COMPETITION

A. CONSIDER THE HEAD-TO-HEAD RECORD DURING THE CONFERENCE SEASON. IN DOUBLE ROUND-ROBIN PLAY, A TEAM WOULD HAVE TO SWEEP THE OPPONENT TO BREAK A TIE WITH THIS METHOD.

B. IN THE CASE OF MORE THAN TWO TIED TEAMS, CONSIDER THE CONFERENCE REGULAR-SEASON RECORD FOR HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPETITION AMONG ALL OF THE TIED TEAMS. THIS PROCESS IS USED TO BREAK TIES BETWEEN ANY OF THE TIED TEAMS WITH ANY REMAINING TIED TEAMS RETURNING TO THE PROCESS AT CRITERIA 1.A. EXAMPLE: TEAMS A, B, C, AND D HAVE IDENTICAL RECORDS FROM A DOUBLE ROUND ROBIN SEASON. IN HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPETITION, TEAM A EMERGES WITH A 4-2 RECORD AGAINST THE OTHER TIED TEAMS, TEAM B AND C HAVE A 3-3 RECORD AND TEAM D HAS A 2-4 RECORD. TEAMS A AND D CAN BE PLACED IN THE FINAL STANDINGS AT THAT POINT, WHILE TEAMS B AND C RETURN TO CRITERIA 1.A. IF B AND C HAVE SPLIT THEIR REGULAR CONFERENCE SEASON GAMES, THEY WILL MOVE TO CRITERIA 2, PERFORMANCE AGAINST OTHER TEAMS IN DESCENDING ORDER.

C. IN THE CASE OF THREE OR MORE TEAMS HAVING IDENTICAL WIN-LOSS RECORDS, THE NORMAL TIE-BREAKING PROCEDURE WOULD BE USED. WHEN ONE OR MORE OF THESE TEAMS IS ELIMINATED BY USING THE TIEBREAKING PROCEDURE, THE REMAINING TEAMS INVOLVED WOULD THEN RETURN TO THE CRITERIA LISTED IN A. TO BREAK THE TIE. THIS WILL BE DONE UNTIL A TEAM IS ESTABLISHED FOR THAT PARTICULAR SEEDING POSITION.


2. PERFORMANCE AGAINST CONFERENCE TEAMS

THIS WILL BE DETERMINED IN DESCENDING ORDER OF FINISH, BEGINNING WITH THE NO. 1 TEAM. (EXAMPLE: TEAMS B AND C REMAINED TIED AFTER HEAD-TO-HEAD CRITERIA FROM ABOVE. TEAM A HAS BEEN DECLARED THE CONFERENCE CHAMPION BASED ON THE ABOVE CRITERIA. TEAM B HAS SPLIT THE CONFERENCE SEASON GAMES WITH TEAM A, AND TEAM C HAS LOST BOTH OF THE CONFERENCE GAMES TO TEAM A. TEAM B IS NOW PLACED IN SECOND PLACE AHEAD OF TEAM C.)


3. RPI RATING

4. COIN TOSS


NOTE: IN ALL TIE-BREAKING PROCEDURES, IF MORETHAN ONE TIE EXISTS, THE TIE AMONG/BETWEEN THE
TEAMS LOWER IN DESCENDING ORDER WILL BE BROKEN FIRST, TO FACILITATE THE PROCESS OF BREAKING THE TIE BETWEEN/AMONG TEAMS HIGHER IN THE ORDER. (EXAMPLE: TEAMS A AND B ARE TIED FOR FIRST AND SECOND, AND TEAMS C AND D ARE TIED FOR FOURTH AND FIVE. ALL TIED TEAMS HAVE SPLIT THE REGULAR CONFERENCE SEASON WITH THEIR TIED OPPONENTS.
TEAMS C AND D BOTH HAVE A 1-3 COMBINED RECORD VS. TEAMS A AND B. TEAM C HAS BEATEN
TEAM A, AND D HAS BEATEN TEAM B. ASSUMING ALL PREVIOUS TIEBREAKERS ARE THE SAME, TEAMS C AND D WILL HAVE THEIR PLACING DECIDED BY THEIR RPI RANKING FIRST (CRITERIA 3), AND THE TEAMS A AND B ENTER THE TIE-BREAKING PROCEDURES.).
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top