Well, I just got back from the game. After reading the comments here, I am realizing GRIZNATION is more critical than I thought. Before I get too far into my observations, I want to comment on Tinkle and the coaches. I spoke to Tinkle, Nate, and Andy after the game. Many of you will be surprised they echo much of what is being posted here on more things than GRIZ fans would think. Yet not quite as extreme on other areas. I do not know what Tinkle said on post game, but the coaches summed it up this way to me. They were upset about the bad start on offense. The difference was mainly FT shooting, inconsistent offense, and a few uncharacteristic turnovers (all of which is spot on with EGRIZ comments.) Basically UNC hit their shots and we did not.
I also noticed a huge difference for the better in Tinkle's pride in this team since the CSU game. After the CSU game, the coaches in general were not very talkative, outright upset, and one could tell there were more questions than answers for this team. After the UNC game, despite the loss Tinkle is very proud of a few things that I feel will be a staple in this program for now on. He is proud of this team's unity/chemistry, work ethic, and defense. Tinkle, his coaches, and team are confident, and without a doubt know they need the offense to step up to be the cream of the conference. I seen no hanging heads, no bad attitudes, and seen everyone encouraging everyone. For anyone that has the impression that Tinkle is soft, you are dead wrong. He chewed ass a few times for turnovers, missed shots, not rotating right. As a coach, I feel he got on the players for good reasons, and made his point. He was more assertive than he was the last 2 years. Now onto my thoughts of the game.
This defense is DRASTICALLY improved. The rotations are consistent, help defense, spacing, and assignment responsibilities are all there. Are they perfect? Hell no, they have an occasional breakdown, but for the most part this a very good defensive team. They could still improve a few things. Good passing teams can beat them weakside because they are so focused on ball side and help defense. AJ, CET, McGillis should gamble more when Qvale is in the game. Qvale is to this defense what AJ is to the offense. Qvale had 6 blocks, most of which were from help defense. As a whole this team has to realize what their strengths and weaknesses are defensively depending on the personnel on the court. Meaning, Qvale is a difference maker. His presence always has an offense wondering where he is at. Quite often the defense forces the offense toward Qvale, and it is very effective. So what is the problem? The few breakdowns come when they try the same thing when he is not in the game. Without Selvig also manning the paint, the others just are not as effective shutting down the paint.
Speaking of Qvale, he has improved more than I thought on both ends of the court. I noticed things I would never notice from an internet feed. Last year he relied on his size and got alot of blocks just because the ball was in his area on lose rebounds etc, but he did not cover much space or help defense. He also was too easily posted up last year. This year, his head is on swivel, very seldom out of position, covers just about as much space as Selvig (who is quicker),and is alot more aware of where the ball is at. Last year, he was lost and had difficulty recovering. This year he is also denying the ball to the post man much much better. Offensively, he is starting to get touch to go along with solid moves. To be honest, he is on the verge of becoming a double digit scorer, and almost as effective as Sharp. Sharp has better range and a knack for being near the ball on the boards. I do not know if Qvale will develop those things. This team is missing Selvig defensively to spell Qvale and his passing. Speaking of Selvig, he will not be back this year.
Offensively we need to still get more consistency. Fortunately our Defense is good to the point in keeping us in games this year. Right now, I would be playing Michael Taylor more than Stauds and McGillis because we need his offense. His shot is consistent now, can shoot off the drible too, he is a good passer, solid ballhandler, and almost as good defensively as McGillis. As for McGillis, I love his hustle and attitude, but he picks of the stupidest fouls still. As for his offense, I can see he has the talent, but somethings just is not there for him this year. This year he is no more than a shutdown defender. His offense is there , but not as often as it needs to be. McGillis has some work to do to live up to the overhype we (including me) gave him offensively.
I also noticed something in Stauds, and think I might have to rewatch a few games on the DVR. In pregame he was hitting everything with picture perfect form. In the game I noticed he is leaning one way or the other more often than not. Stauds is a square up pure shooter, he is not squaring up as much as he is used to doing.
Overall I am disappointed the GRIZ lost, but unlike the CSU game, I am not pissed. IF the GRIZ hit their shots, this team is good enough to win the title. The offense will determine how well or how bad they do. So in my opinion they do well what we questioned in the past. They play defense, work hard, and have good chemistry. Unfortunately the offense is a rollercoaster this year. GO GRIZ!!!!!!!!!!