Where this conversation seems to go off the rails, is really about a position that totaled 26 or so catches and 9 TD's last year. We are obsessed, in the past and present about a position that several coaches for differing reasons, don't utilize in the same way we see on Sunday.
Bruce Arians advocates for a big guy who can block, but doesn't need to stretch the defense. He wants an inline blocker. Others like to split TE's out, but whatever it is the scheme is, but we have had this inane debate over the position from the days of willie walden.
This offense pushes vertical on the edge and with slot receivers. Our TE's don't split out a ton and are expected to bring an ability to set the edge in the run game. So Harper's skill set as a vertical threat is lost in the general scheme of this offense.
Yet we seem to rail, over and over again, how our OC's misuse players. My question is why does it seem logical to create a scheme, that doesn't fit with the overall design of the offense, just to fit a positional matchup that we want to see. Sometimes it seems so Madden to me in some of the logic used.
In the end, I hate to see anyone who has value to the program leave. There are a myriad of issues that we cannot possibly know that is going on behind the scenes. I wish Harper the best of luck in his future endeavors whatever they may be.