grizd said:PlayerRep said:grizd said:The playing time decision is as much about next year as it is this year. All things equal give the minutes and experience to the younger guy that can help set the future of the program. That's my guess.
I don't agree. UM is in the conference race and in the mix to win the tourney and go to the ncaa's. Playing time should be about doing what's best to win games and have the depth to advance from the tourney. I readily acknowledge that the coach knows much more about the situation than I do, but I also know what the internet is for.
I said all things equal. Playing Kemp doesn't give them a better chance at winning. His biggest issue is how you match him up on the defensive end. Not effort, not offensive game, not rebounding. If you think the coach isn't trying to win games you obviously haven't coached the game.![]()
Okay, to further beat the dead horse. Even if the players were equal in talent, then I still say that it would be better to give starters a bit more rest and not wear them down for the next game and the remainder of the season. You can't tell me I never coached the game. That's irrelevant. I am going to cry like some seem to do when I say I can tell they never played the game. Ha.